The parties to each marriage that is
valid under the law of any state will be treated as a spouse as defined in this policy.
The parties to each marriage that is
valid under the law of any state will be treated as a spouse as defined in this policy.
Not exact matches
If any part
of this Agreement is determined to be invalid or unenforceable
under applicable
law, that provision will be removed, and the remainder
of the Agreement will continue to be
valid and enforceable, except as expressly
stated.
The Department
of Transportation's Drug and Alcohol Testing Regulation — 49 CFR Part 40, at 40.151 (e)-- does not authorize «medical marijuana»
under a
state law to be a
valid medical explanation for a transportation employee's positive drug test result.
In general terms, if you ask the court
of a sovereign
state to probate a will, the court will inquire if the will is
valid under national
law.
The order contained three questions: (i) whether Article 4a (1) FD must be interpreted as prohibiting Member
States from making the execution
of an EAW subject to the possibility
of retrial in cases where a conviction has been rendered in absentia; (ii) whether Article 4a (1) FD is
valid in light
of Articles 47 and 48
of the EU Charter
of Fundamental Rights; and (iii) whether,
under Article 53
of the Charter, it can grant a higher level
of protection than that provided for
under EU
law.
Washington Wills is taking things a step further by providing the information you need to know whether the will you make for yourself is
valid under the
laws of Washington
State.
In the UAE there are just three ways to legally terminate a contract, as provided for in Article 267
of the UAE Civil Code which
states that «if a contract is
valid and binding, it shall not be permissible for either
of the contracting parties to resile from it, or vary or cancel it, save by mutual consent, or an order
of the court, or
under a provision
of the
law».
Under Illinois
law, a forum selection clause is generally
valid and should be enforced unless (1) the opposing party shows that it would violate a strong public policy
of the
state in which the case is filed or (2) enforcing the clause would be unreasonable in that it is so inconvenient that it basically deprives the party
of its day in court.
a) the agreement was null and void
under the
law of the
State of the chosen court, unless the chosen court has determined that the agreement is
valid; b) a party lacked the capacity to conclude the agreement
under the
law of the requested
State; c) the document which instituted the proceedings or an equivalent document, including the essential elements
of the claim,
The following cases suggest that if a claim is
valid under Section 1983
of the Federal Civil Rights Act, that
state law granting immunity to the official can not override Federal
law under the Supremacy Clause.
We also proposed to explicitly
state that the requirement for Exchanges to ensure appropriate actions are taken in connection with retroactive terminations, currently set forth in paragraph (d)(6) regarding special enrollment periods, applies to all retroactive terminations, including
valid cancellations
of coverage
under a «free look»
law.
For example, in March 2017, the
state of Arizona passed legislation (HB 2417) to amend its version
of the UETA to confirm that electronic signatures, records or contracts secured through blockchain technology are
valid under the
state law.
The court looked to the relevant Connecticut licensing statutes and determined that according to Connecticut
law, «competent real estate brokers who are duly licensed and currently practicing in other
states with licensing requirements and reciprocity provisions similar to Connecticut's will be given preferential treatment in obtaining their Connecticut licenses... an out -
of -
state broker may not simply come into Connecticut and do business as a real estate broker
under the putative authority
of his
valid out -
of -
state broker's license.»