Not exact matches
They
understand they there are multiple
ways of seeing problems; that admitting their limitations and tapping into others» knowledge is essential; that the
way their teams see them is
valid and important.
And,
understand, I'm not trying to attack or defend any certain viewpoint, I'm criticizing the logical delivery
of the viewpoint and exploring other
ways of formulating the viewpoint that might be logically
valid.
Valid a priori arguments, indeed, may be held only to «impoverish» experience in the sense that they show the intrinsic unsatisfactoriness
of certain
ways of understanding reality and bring to light the structures involved in any
understanding of it which presupposes and is consistent with the principle
of rationality.
Those who maintain that the idiom
of resurrection is to be
understood only in the traditional (or Lucan) sense2 would, if correct, leave us with no alternative but to abandon the idiom as a
valid way of professing our Christian faith, if we are among the growing number
of Christians for whom that tradition is neither historically founded nor even very meaningful.
In this sense, Chatterjee's (2004) intimation that in most
of the world we must look below the formal trappings
of citizenship to
understand the
way in which people experience political authority, while clearly
valid, should not lead us to underestimate the dignity that is imparted by official recognition, even if the latter is purely nominal.
Understanding best practices regarding the
ways to structure assessments, methods to identify
valid and reliable assessments, and how to interpret and react to data are essential elements
of a high - quality assessment process.
In terms
of painters, I think Amy Sillman is pretty amazing... Patricia Treib, I think her process, without my realizing it is very similar to mine in that she takes a single image
of something she has drawn, and then uses it and uses it and uses it so the form performs this emptying process: content feels emptied out, which is maybe a
valid way to
understanding what I am doing too.
There's no significant change in the
understanding of climate change or global warming which continue to be
valid expressions (while CAGW is just a concept invented by skeptics to use as they like and in a
way that does not reflect main stream views).
By doing so you might learn along the
way the real
valid physics
of heat transfer in fluid dynamics which is how we get out great wind and weather systems from the equator to the poles, because you would then
understand that the atmosphere around us is a heavy voluminous fluid and the dynamics
of heat transfer in this is by convection which is what wind is, created out
of differential heating
of volumes
of this fluid.
Unless the filer
understands the laws well, it is hard to respond to some
of the questions — which, by the
way, are very
valid and legitimate questions for the USCIS to ask.