If this guy has scientific evidence of intelligent design that can be
validated by other scientists, that would be really exciting.
Not exact matches
«The bias is just so extreme»
Others seriously questioned whether the world's community of climate
scientists is caught in a cyclone of self - promotion, driven
by the pressure to
validate past findings and to receive federal grants.
In
other words, the
scientist who publishes on evolution of diet must admit that such appeals to evolution are highly speculative and only can be a «mere hypothesis» until
validated by «interdisciplinary research».
If you are a
scientist or engineer and believe the AGW part of climate change is well described
by the models, then I will ask you to explain how the hypothesis is calculated and how independnently
validated by others experiments, over the time periods predicted ex ante, not ex post, how the forcing variable from CO2 to water vapour was hypothesisied and then proven.