... therefore abasing Christ to the category of a religion... equal in
validity as other religions, as other «gods».
Not exact matches
This hypocritical belief applies to all lovers of the self, lovers of self - will, lovers of self - interest, lovers of self - rights...... lovers of the belief in freedom of rights and
religion... making Christ into a «faith» of the same
validity as any
other man - made «
religion».
This world universal belief stipulates that all «
religions» are equal in
validity and that there is no singular, omni present, and true god... all are equal to each
other and are to be respected
as having the same right of existence and worship.
Where Christianity and Islam are very articulate
as to their universal
validity and
as the only way for the entire humanity, the
other world
religions display in different ways a similar penchant for monopoly.
In
other words,
religion can, for the purpose of these theories, in principle be either reconstructed or abolished and seen
as pointing to a more comprehensive theoretical system.4 By locating
religion in a larger explanatory context it gives «its public claim to
validity a purely relative value».5
«9 Correlatively, Smith observes the word «
religions» (plural form) comes into use only
as one «contemplates from the outside, and abstracts, depersonalizes, and reifies the various systems of
other people of which one does not oneself see the meaning or appreciate the point, let alone accept the
validity.