This study, intended to provide additional construct
validity evidence through discrimination among other self - regulatory constructs, indicated that, as expected, scores from the SRLTAS were positively correlated with reports of higher self - handicapping and negatively correlated with endorsed generalized self - efficacy.
Not exact matches
Yes I know this will happen because I have been
through these arguments time and time again and when I pull out my Bible that people claim to have read and match it to the scientific
evidence that points very clearly to the
validity and truth of the Bible they shut up and don't want to hear it.
Content
validity could be
evidenced through a description of the procedures followed to develop and test the assessment including:
Creswell and Miller (2000) stressed that
validity in a qualitative study is strengthened when researchers go
through the difficult process of searching for
evidence that disconfirms their assertions.
«The confidence metric provides a qualitative synthesis of an author team's judgment about the
validity of a finding, as determined
through evaluation of
evidence and agreement.
The EPO can be generous to a limited extent: post-filing
evidence can bolster
validity of the first filing but only provided it is not being used to cure a fundamental insufficiency
through lack of data and is instead confirming the underlying teachings in the first filing (decision T1205 / 07).
Results highlighted a)
through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, a meaningful six - factor model (emotion expression, task utility self - persuasion, help - seeking, negative self - talk, brief attentional relaxation, and dysfunctional avoidance); b) satisfactory internal reliabilities; c) test - retest reliability scores indicative of a satisfactory stability of the measures over time; d) preliminary
evidence of convergent and discriminant
validity with CERS - M being very weakly linked to verbal skill and moderately to emotion regulation strategies measured
through the Flemish version of the COPE - questionnaire; e) preliminary
evidence of criterion
validity, with CERS - M scores predicting math anxiety, and to a lesser extent, students» performance; f) preliminary
evidence of incremental
validity, with the CERS - M predicting math anxiety and performance over and above emotion regulation measured by the COPE - questionnaire.
Evidence of
validity is provided
through group age, group size, and by the fact that the ratings reflect team characteristics.
Results highlighted a)
through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, a meaningful six - factor model (emotion expression, task utility self - persuasion, help - seeking, negative self - talk, brief attentional relaxation, and dysfunctional avoidance); b) satisfactory internal reliabilities; c) test - retest reliability scores indicative of a satisfactory stability of the measures over time; d) preliminary
evidence of convergent and discriminant
validity with CERS - M being very weakly linked to verbal skill and moderately to emotion regulation strategies measured
through the Flemish version of the COPE - questionnaire; e) preliminary
evidence of criterion
validity, with CERS - M scores predicting math anxiety, and to a lesser extent, students» performance; f) preliminary
evidence of incremental
validity, with the CERS - M predicting math anxiety and performance over and above emotion regulation measured by the COPE - questionnaire.