Sentences with phrase «validity of the temperature records»
As far as i was aware the climate sensitivity issue still remains, as too do the questions over the validity of the temperature records (raising the distinct possibility that the change you are trying to detect is smaller than the error limits themselves) and the modelling parameters.
https://judithcurry.com/
How this really changes things when it comes to the validity of temperature records is never made clear and in addition the folks at WUWT who are trying to push this meme seem to me to be trying to confuse the issue by making references to Leroy 1999 and Leroy 2010 as though these were peer reviewed papers, which I can't find any evidence of.
Not exact matches
It seems that attacks on the validity of the surface temperature record as an attempt to cast doubt on the recent warming trend would have been a bit more convincing back in the day when there were competing satellite temperature records that suggested a cooling trend.
«One demanding test of the validity of the computer simulations of the climate of the earth is based on temperature records from the Arctic... When tested against the Arctic temperature record, therefore, the computer forecasts are seen to exaggerate the projected warming by a large amount.»
It seems that attacks on the validity of the surface temperature record as an attempt to cast doubt on the recent warming trend would have been a bit more convincing back in the day when there were competing satellite temperature records that suggested a cooling trend.
Steve's work makes no comment on studies of, say, sea level or the validity of the global temperature instrument record, proxy studies unrelated to MBH, or any of the other myriad pieces that the IPCC relies on.
However, the relocation of Stevenson Screen recording stations around Perth, coinciding with different temperature plateaux, raises questions about the validity of trends since 1897 and claims of record hot years that precede 1994.
And yet no one proposes spending fifteen billion dollars to properly study the validity of the surface temperature record of the United States.
It's also worth noting that Muller himself has been careful not to pronounce on AGW, only the validity of the global land temperature record.
It has no more validity than Steven Goddard's cries of «fraud» in regard to the USHCN temperature record.