Our study re-analyzed a pre-existing event - related potential (ERP) dataset to test
the validity of this assumption.
The validity of this assumption has been successfully tested multiple times since our launch.
In their analysis, NORC researchers Nick Rabkin and Eric Hedberg test and ultimately confirm
the validity of an assumption made with prior SPPA data, that participation in arts lessons and classes is the most significant predictor of arts participation later in life, even after controlling for other variables.
Using elementary and secondary school data from North Carolina and Florida, this paper investigates
the validity of this assumption.
Is it «negligent» that no one checked
the validity of the assumption?
A realistic practitioner pursues due diagnostics to check
the validity of assumptions underpinning stat inference.
To assess
the validity of this assumption, LaDochy et al. «use temperature trends in California climate records over the last 50 years [1950 - 2000] to measure the extent of warming in the various sub-regions of the state.»
Other scientists, acting as skeptics, challenge the hypothesis by testing
the validity of the assumptions.
This court has questioned
the validity of this assumption and suggested that the character of the employment is «a factor of declining relative importance»: Di Tomaso v. Crown Metal Packaging Canada LP, at paras. 27 - 28.
To test
the validity of this assumption, mothers and fathers completed post -
However,
the validity of the assumptions in this study (e.g., that non-ER care often reflects timely use of services, preventive interventions, and responsiveness to early signs of illness) is supported in the literature (Adler & Rehkopf, 2008; Larson & Halfon, 2010).