Similar to you, I actually have enough to carry us through retirement without much stock exposure, but my plan is to get back in when
valuation ratios return to more historically normal levels.
Not exact matches
MarketCap / GVA is better correlated with actual subsequent S&P 500 total
returns than price / forward earnings, the Fed Model, the Shiller P / E, price / book, price / dividend, Tobin's Q, market capitalization to GDP, price / revenue and every other
valuation ratio we've developed or examined in market cycles across history.
Among the
valuation measures most tightly correlated across history with actual subsequent S&P 500 total
returns, the
ratio of market capitalization to corporate gross value added would now have to retreat by nearly 60 % simply to reach its pre-bubble average.
The most reliable measures of individual stock
valuation we've found are based on formal discounted cash flow considerations, but among publicly - available measures we've evaluated, price / revenue
ratios are better correlated with actual subsequent
returns than price / earnings
ratios (though normalized profit margins and other factors are obviously necessary to make cross-sectional comparisons).
US large - cap stocks
returned more than 9 percent in the first half of 2017, the most since 2013, and although prices are close to all - time highs, analysts are of the opinion that
valuations are not very expensive for a majority of these stocks, as stronger earnings upped the price - to - earnings
ratio, which has generally remained above average for quite a few years.
While other historically reliable metrics carry a very similar message, Market Cap / GVA has the highest correlation with actual subsequent 10 - year S&P 500 total
returns than any other
valuation ratio we've examined across history.
In an attempt to cast light on this issue, my colleagues at Plexus Asset Management have updated a previous multi-year comparison of the price - earnings (PE)
ratios of the S&P 500 Index (as a measure of stock
valuations) and the forward real
returns (considering total
returns, i.e. capital movements plus dividends).
We composed a blend of five key
valuation metrics — including forward price - to - earnings
ratios and price - to - book value — and examined how strong the relationship was between starting
valuations — or
valuations at the time of purchase — and the variability of subsequent U.S. dollar
returns over time.
At the market's actual 2000 peak,
valuations were so high that even a future price / peak earnings
ratio of 20 could have been expected to result in a nearly zero annualized
returns over the following 10 years.
Investment Strategy: Roth IRAs: How to Optimize Yours From Dollars to Millions: How to Invest in Stocks 6 Smart Investment Strategies for Superior
Returns Contrarian Investing: How to Stay a Step Ahead Discounted Cash Flow Analysis: A Comprehensive Overview International Investing: Be Aware of This Common Pitfall Covered Calls: How to Get a Ton of Investment Income Selling Put Options: How to Get Paid for Being Patient Index Funds: Yes, There Are Some Downsides Thrift Savings Plan (TSP): Fund Overview Risk vs Volatility: How to Profit from the Difference The Shiller PE (CAPE)
Ratio: Current Market
Valuations How to Invest Money Intelligently Equal Weighted Index Funds: Pros and Cons How to Generate Investment Income from Precious Metals 5 Rock - Solid Blue Chip Dividend Stocks Share Buybacks: The Good, The Bad, And The Ugly
The cyclically - adjusted price / earnings
ratio («CAPE»), among other
valuation metrics, suggests that stocks are priced to deliver flat or negative
returns over the next decade.
We composed a blend of five key
valuation metrics — including forward price - to - earnings
ratios and price - to - book value — and examined how strong the relationship was between starting
valuations — or
valuations at the time of purchase — and the variability of subsequent U.S. dollar
returns over time.
But given today's low interest rates (recently about 2.3 % for 10 - year Treasuries) and relatively rich stock
valuations (Yale finance professor Robert Shiller's cyclically adjusted P / E
ratio for the stock market recently stood at 29.2 vs. an average of 16.7 since 1900), it would seem to strain credulity to expect anything close to the annualized
returns of close to the annualized
return of 10 % for stocks and 5 % for bonds over the past 90 years or so, let alone the dizzying gains the market has generated from its post-financial crisis lows.
For this version, I've defined bubble
valuations as Shiller P / E
ratios of 21 and above, which have historically been followed by poor long - term
returns.
Specifically, the All Asset strategies» recent strong performance (see Figure 1) may be attributable in large part to four fundamental drivers of global capital market
returns: the breakeven inflation rate (BEI), EM currency
valuations, EM - to - U.S. cyclically adjusted price / earnings (CAPE)
ratios and the global value premium.
P / E
ratios may be the established standard for
valuation purposes, but earnings yields are especially useful for comparing potential
returns across different instruments.
Other
valuation measures, such as the
ratio of the stock price to earnings and stock price to revenue, are also analyzed in relation to expected future growth of cash flows in an attempt to measure underlying value and the potential for long - term
returns.
Therefore, a quick look at forecasts utilizing the normal P / E
ratio as a
valuation reference shows that future
returns over the next year or two might not be that exciting if the 7.4 normal P / E
ratio holds.
Thus, traders and investors using aggregate financial accounting numbers to derive superficial financial
ratios (e.g. profit margin,
return - on - equity) and
valuation metrics (e.g. low price - to - earnings, low price - to - book) without understanding the underlying business model, the related - party transactions artificially inflating the aggregate financial numbers and the data generation process in the financial footnotes can be misled.
Thus, traders and investors using aggregate financial accounting numbers to derive superficial financial
ratios (e.g. profit margin,
return - on - equity) and
valuation (e.g. low price - to - earnings, low price - to - book) without understanding the underlying business model, the related - party transactions artificially inflating the aggregate financial numbers and the data generation process in the financial footnotes can be misled.
Five - Year Forecasts We summarize the
valuation ratios, historical
returns, historical
returns net of
valuation changes, and expected
returns along with estimation errors for the most popular factors and strategies in Table 2.
Additionally, a P / E
ratio of 15 represents a
valuation metric of a current earnings yield that also closely correlates with the long - term rate of
return (6 % to 8 %) that stocks have delivered when
valuations were aligned with intrinsic value (P / E 15).
While other historically reliable metrics carry a very similar message, Market Cap / GVA has the highest correlation with actual subsequent 10 - year S&P 500 total
returns than any other
valuation ratio we've examined across history.
Also note that I will hedge what I can if expected 10 - year
returns get down to 3 % / year, which corresponds to a
ratio of 42.4 % in stocks, and the 95th percentile of
valuations.
But overall, the scope for capital gains seems compelling, noting particularly the recent 10 - 15 % pa rent increases (albeit, interrupted by the recent heavy - handed two year rent freeze), though obviously this should already be reflected within the IRES portfolio
valuation / yield & investors» total
return expectations — a 1.0 Price / Book
ratio still seems appropriate: Continue reading →
On the contrary, since the 1940's, the
ratio of equity market value to GDP has demonstrated a 90 % correlation with subsequent 10 - year total
returns on the S&P 500 (see Investment, Speculation,
Valuation, and Tinker Bell), and the present level is associated with projected annual total
returns on the S&P 500 of just over 3 % annually.
The Speculative
Return is defined as the annualized return caused by changes in valuations (such as the price to earnings r
Return is defined as the annualized
return caused by changes in valuations (such as the price to earnings r
return caused by changes in
valuations (such as the price to earnings
ratio).
The point here is that the P / E
ratio of 15 is a
valuation reference, but it does not automatically ensure good
returns.
Low Quality's Round Trip Bad News Bulls Stock Performance Following the Recognition of Recession The Beginning of the Middle Experimenting with the Market's Median
Valuation Anchored Inflation Expectations and the Expected Misery Index Consumer Spending Break - Down Recessions and the Duration of Bad News Price - to - Sales
Ratio May Prove Valuable International Markets Show Important Divergences Fixed Investment and the Technology Rally Global Yield Curves, Earnings Growth, and Sector
Returns Recessions and Stock Prices Adjusting P / E
Ratios for the Market Cycle Private Equity and Market
Valuation Must Stocks Rise Following a Cut in the Fed Funds Rate?
In the context of your series on
valuation metrics and equity expected
returns, I'd be interested in your thoughts on our meta - study of market expected
returns using various smoothed PE
ratios, the Q
ratio, mkt cap / GNP and regression to trend measures.
Valuations like P / E
ratios are relevant to long - term
returns but don't mean much when facing extreme short - term volatility.
market
valuations; cyclically - adjusted price - earnings
ratio; PE10; stock
returns; market timing; long term; tactical asset allocation; buy and hold
Strong market performance has inflated U.S. equity
valuations, potentially moving the risk /
return ratio out of the investor's favor.
The strong market performance has inflated U.S. equity
valuations, potentially moving the risk /
return ratio out of the investor's favor.
Returning to asset managers, % of AUM is the key absolute
valuation metric, and I believe Price / Sales (based on operating profit margins) is the best stock specific
valuation ratio.
But overall, the scope for capital gains seems compelling, noting particularly the recent 10 - 15 % pa rent increases (albeit, interrupted by the recent heavy - handed two year rent freeze), though obviously this should already be reflected within the IRES portfolio
valuation / yield & investors» total
return expectations — a 1.0 Price / Book
ratio still seems appropriate:
Eventually this means that the momentum component may generate bubbles and crashes in the short and medium run, nevertheless the
valuation ratio remains a good reference point of future long - run
returns.
We present a simple dynamical model of stock index
returns which is grounded on the ability of the Cyclically Adjusted Price Earning (CAPE)
valuation ratio devised by Robert Shiller to predict long - horizon performances of the market.
I've written extensively about the relationship between starting
valuations and future
returns (my preferred
valuation tool is the CAPE
ratio).
However, based on current
valuations (using the Shiller CAPE
ratio as of May), expected
returns on U.S. stocks are now only about 6.1 %, while those for international equities are 7.9 %.
Historically it has been mean reversion of
valuation ratios like price to book and price to earnings which have had the greatest effect on long term equity
returns.