A high
value claim previously worth around # 8m may well reach over # 17m now.
Not exact matches
Tom, If you accept that the pauses,
previously occurring and the one at the present, are part of long period cycles whose long term average is related to the actual long term trend of temperature (rather than the far steeper slope of rise from just 1980 to 1999), you are admitting that the rise (from whatever cause) has a slope of closer to 0.4 C per century than the super inflated
values of 2C to 6C per century
claimed by the models and supporters of CAGW.
So you did see the
claim in the IPCC report, and yet you, a science journalist, and someone who had spent 15 years researching water security, didn't think to investigate where the
claim — that you had
previously regarded as dubious, and controversial — had been substantiated, but decided to take at face
value?
In the Tesco case, the checkout workers are arguing that their job is of equal
value to that of the men who have
previously claimed they work harder in the warehouses.
As we have discussed
previously, a Georgia wrongful death case has two components, the statutory
claim for the
value of the life and the
claim by the Estate of the deceased for pain and suffering, medical expenses, fear of imminent death and funeral expenses.
In these circumstances, it is possible for the claimant to discover at a later date that the
value of the
claim is more than they had
previously calculated — in the event that new evidence comes to light.
This will allow insurers / defendants to avoid having to make the kind of inflated offer they had to
previously — not in keeping with their view of the true
value of the
claim — in order to protect themselves against adverse costs awards — a very positive development.
She has
previously advised on quantum in medical negligence and high -
value claims, and liability in various areas of personal injury law.
The government was persuaded not to raise the small
claims limit, nor indeed extend the process to non-road traffic accident
claims or
claims up to the
value of # 25,000 which had also been
previously suggested by it.
«There are a number of funding models now available that have been built to hedge the gap in the market for funding lower -
value cases, which is important because it was
previously seen as a product for multimillion - dollar
claims that wouldn't work for anything else.
He said that a reason behind extending the fixed fees regime was that the experience of practitioners with the fixed fee regime in low -
value claims had been «satisfactory» and that the new costs management system (which had
previously been introduced by Jackson) was placing the courts under strain.