Not exact matches
Is there not a difference in the predicates of a Catholic university and those who
claim the right to teach any
value free from the supervision of the
authorities who hire them?
Although the empowerment of its own members is an important goal for every marginalized social group, by
claiming an
authority based in epistemic privilege the group reinscribes the
values and practices used to socially marginalize it by excluding its voice, silencing it and commanding its obedience to the voice of the dominant group.
The substantive
claim is that Confucian
values are anti-democratic; Asian societies, according to Samuel Huntington, are said to favor
authority over liberty, the group over the individual, duties over rights and such
values as harmony, cooperation, order and respect for hierarchy (Huntington, 1993).
The escape from postmodern relativism has been to locate
authority not in human - centric ideas,
values, or principles, but to ground it in what appears to be objectivity... «Science says...» This really does turn «science» into «just another narrative», because it now starts to become an encompassing framework, from which
claims are made about the non-material world.
Proposals for fixed recoverable costs in lower
value clinical negligence
claims should include the words «culture change» in relation to the NHS and the NHS Litigation
Authority (NHSLA), says Agata Usewicz, head of clinical negligence at Hodge, Jones & Allen, in this week's NLJ.
The timing of the Department of Health's long - awaited consultation Introducing Fixed Recoverable Costs in Lower
Value Clinical Negligence
Claims raised more than a few eyebrows when it was launched at the end of January, not least because the consultation will open and close before the National Audit Office's (NAO) investigation into the operations and efficiencies of the NHS Litigation
Authority (NHSLA) will report its findings.
He is involved in multiple follow - on
claims arising out of headline cartel decisions and has also acted for listed companies and local
authorities in high -
value procurement challenges.
Rule 9 - 1 (5) and 9 - 1 (6) were not intended, in my view, to punish parties merely because the party's assessment of the
value of the
claim proves incorrect, unless that assessment was based on irrelevant considerations; a clearly inadequate review of the available evidence and applicable
authorities, or was, in view of the facts known at the time, unreasonable.
Yet, that is clearly insufficient to appease the legitimate concerns of asylum seekers in similar situations, since they will be at the mercy of (administrative and judicial)
authorities who may happily offer probative
value to «junk science» detrimental to their asylum
claims.
Insurers give the
authority of settling (accepting / rejecting) a
claim to the TPA, usually where the
claim value is low and the case doesn't involve too much assessment.