That experience allows her to fully understand how these entities will try to defend lawsuits, and how
they value claims brought against them.
Not exact matches
It's just that the expense of formal V&V measured
against the results of other kinds of Q / A is deemed not worth it, not to mention that there are those who argue that V&V doesn't
bring nearly as much
value to the table as V&V proponents
claim.
Through our representation, we were able to
bring a
claim on behalf of our client
against the at - fault driver and the driver's insurance company for the full
value of our client's injuries, including his medical bills and wages he lost while he was unable to work.
Long v. Courtaulds Fibers, Circuit Court of Mobile County (2000) The Longs
brought a lawsuit
against Courtaulds Fibers
claiming that pollution from its manufacturing facility was causing serious health problems for their livestock and diminished the
value of their property.
Former partner of a firm of solicitors — representing a former partner of an established firm of solicitors
against claims of negligence, breach of FSMA and dishonest assistance
brought by over 500 investors in technology schemes which were designed to be tax efficient and
valued at about # 90m.
Successfully defended international company
against self - dealing
claims brought by minority shareholder in $ 150 million business valuation dispute in which, after one week trial, the minority shares were
valued at less than ten percent of amount sought.
Senior University Academic v Well - Known University Represented at preliminary hearing a renowned senior university academic
bringing very high
value claims of sex, race and disability discrimination
against a well - known university and named professors
Without evidence that the warranty could not be relied upon, a claimant would struggle to establish that the
claim for the loss of
value was correctly
brought against the defendant tortfeasor.
Where a
claim is
brought against a defendant, consideration should be given not only to the likelihood of success, as compared to the
value of the damages and costs the case exposes the client to, but also to the media coverage of the case, the reduction of the party's goodwill if the issue is fought, and the cost of re-establishing that goodwill.
Not surprisingly, the three longest decisions of the year were in complex commercial cases, one involving alleged inducement to make a multi-million dollar loan (VTB Capital plc v Nutritek [2013] UKSC 5), another on how to calculate the
value of unjustly received services (Benedetti v Sawiris [2013] UKSC 50), and the third relating to the settlement of a
claim brought by shipowners
against insurers (The Alexandros T [2013] UKSC 70).