Sentences with phrase «value for investors too»

While this is aimed at sellers it has value for investors too.

Not exact matches

Rather, it is a time for investors and founders to create a culture of building value one step at a time — without loading the balance sheet with too much capital — allowing all shareholders a better chance to win.

«For too long, companies have sacrificed long - term value creation to generate short - term results, which erodes the sustainability strategic investors seek.

«[Crypto values] went too high, too fast... at the time I urged caution, saying an asset that goes almost vertically up should typically raise alarm bells for investors... Arguable, even before the frenzied peak in December, when the price of one Bitcoin reached an all time high of more than $ 19,000, the market was beginning to become frothy and overheated.»

The reason I say that was my worst mistake of omission is because the only reason I passed on that stock is because I had read too many value investing books, thought too much about the right multiples for a stock, wrote about value investing, talked with other value investors, etc..

The key point to remember here is that for businesses that will grow their earnings even at a moderate pace, but for a long long time, seemingly high P / E multiples which deter many value investors, are actually too low.

Perhaps investors become overly enamored of growth companies and pay too much for their shares, while mistakenly shunning value companies, where growth prospects often appear grim.

I personally still think that the definition of value investing as buying things for less than they're worth is too broad, for it effectively makes almost every long - focused active investor a «value investor» by definition.

So while it is true that munis did experience one of their worst monthly declines in February, it is also true that they have been beaten down to value levels too good for the some of world's best investors to ignore.

Value investors know the importance of the debt for operating a business and they also know that too much debt can kill.

Tobias» simple advice for value investors is easier to follow than the Benjamin Graham current valuation approach, but may be too vague or simplistic to provide the best results.

Donating appreciated securities carries valuable tax savings, too — namely, the donor won't owe capital gains taxes on the appreciation in the shares, and he or she can deduct the full market value of the shares at the time of the donation, provided the investor has owned them for up to one year and provided the deduction is less than 30 % of adjusted gross income.

Of course, we're already seeing this phenomenon in terms of investor sentiment & the markets... and conversely, small cap / value stocks are now being generally neglected as far too difficult & illiquid a proposition for most such buyers.

On the first quarter call for the Fairholme Fund, Berkowitz reaffirmed his investment thesis for AIG, saying only that, like most good value investors, he had gotten in too early and that he never contemplated a scenario in which the US Treasury would sell its shares below their cost (about $ 28.70 / share).

Homebuilding ETFs are making it much too easy for new investors to make the biggest mistake of them all: taking an ETF's name at face value.

Investors, for behavioral or institutional reasons, commit systematic errors when they value securities that induce them to pay too much for winners (low E / P or B / P stocks) and too little for losers (boring, poorly performing, unknown and out - of - favor (high E / P or B / P) companies).

The outcome is so binary, in hindsight an equity valuation will be far too low, or high... I often notice that the market / investors can ignore debt for long periods of time — i.e. they value a company almost exactly like its debt free peer.

Rather, we believe it works because investors are human and, as they search for a signal in the noise that surrounds the stock market, they often attribute too much meaning and overreact to information that proves to have little to do with the long - term value of their investments.

This point shouldn't be discounted — we are all human, and it's all - too - common for investors to panic when the value of their portfolio drops during a market correction.

But knowing our all - too human biases, I reckon growth investing may ultimately be more palatable & rewarding for most investors — perhaps / simply because value investing can be far too demanding.

Of course, more adventurous growth investors don't even blink at such numbers... but for the average value investor, on the face of it, these P / Es are likely way too steep to even consider (in absolute, relative, and / or PEG ratio terms)!

A pure value, pure growth, Buffett, etc. approach to investing is too difficult and / or all - consuming for most investors.

7) Fees are generally too high in asset management, and most people should go for passive management, or a few clever value investors.

We were founded in late 2013 to house the capital raised in the first crowdsale over the Bitcoin blockchain, prior leadership made some mistakes, hiring too many people when we were flush, not hedging BTC value, lack of a proper technical roadmap for the first 8 months, so we didn't deliver on our promises as fast as OMNI investors would have liked.

@Mark Allen @Tony Nguyen Thanks for providing such value to hungry investors, if it's not too late, I'd like to get one of your copies.