Sentences with phrase «value investment because»

It amazes me how many landlords complain about tenants not paying or valuing their dwellings when they too don't value their investments because of their low requirements.

Not exact matches

«Yahoo's core business seems to have gone down in value while she was CEO but its stock went up because its 2005 investment in Alibaba went up in value,» he told Inc. in a July email exchange about Fortune's reporting.

-- Springer is actually only buying 88 % of Business Insider, because it already owned a 9 % stake as a result of an investment round in January (which valued the company at less than half what Springer is now paying).

«Because we are in the hospitality and recreation business, which is largely dependent on discretionary spending,» the company's latest financial report explains, «we believe that the weak housing market, increases in unemployment, decreases in air flights to Las Vegas, decreases in the value of stock and other investments, and the general tightening of spending on business travel have all affected visitations to Las Vegas and the spending budget of our customers.»

«The more you put in today, the much more you'll have later down the road because of the time value of money and the growth on investment returns,» Michael Solari, a certified financial planner with Solari Financial Management, told Business Insider.

Corporate debt in China exceeds 250 % of gross domestic product, and the government has put restrictions on international investment because the value of the yuan was falling so fast.

In an investment letter on Friday, Healy wrote that he continues to like the potential of some gold stocks particularly because they have lagged behind the value of the price of bullion.

Your goal is to diversify your net worth by making public equity investments equal to no more than 50 % of your net worth because you realize the value of various asset classes.

That is because a decline in the dollar would raise the value of the income earned on our foreign direct investment and foreign - currency denominated assets, relative to the income that foreigners earned on their dollar - denominated investments in the United States.

That's because the main goal of stock investments is to increase in value.

Equity investments involve more risk because their value will fluctuate according to their performance.

Buffett has said Berkshire's operating earnings are a better measure of how the company is performing in any given period, because those figures exclude the value of derivatives and investment gains or losses.

When the Company seeks cash investments from outside investors, like you, the new investors typically pay a much larger sum for their shares than the founders or earlier investors, which means that the cash value of your stake is immediately diluted because each share of the same type is worth the same amount, and you paid more for your shares (or the notes convertible into shares) than earlier investors did for theirs.

Companies like to use EPS as a performance metric because it is the primary focus of financial analysts when assessing the value of a stock and of investors when evaluating their return on investment.

Level 3 assets are generally illiquid investments that are difficult to value, both because there is no easily observable market price (level 1), nor is there a reliable pricing model (level 2).

That's because the overall trade deficit is governed by macroeconomic factors, including the relative growth rates of countries, the value of their currencies, and their saving and investment rates.

Because Berkshire shares don't pay dividends, the income implies that the non-Berkshire assets were valued at about $ 500 million if he had investment returns of 13 percent.

... because to justify fees, many fiduciaries must present themselves as «investment experts» who can add value through active mgmt

China's public - sector investment, in other words, is value destroying, and because it is funded by debt, additional investment causes China's real debt servicing costs to rise faster than its real debt servicing capacity.

Because if they try to take 50 % of your company for $ 500,000 then they know it will be very hard to raise VC because we'll know that too much of the value has been taken away from the founders before our inveBecause if they try to take 50 % of your company for $ 500,000 then they know it will be very hard to raise VC because we'll know that too much of the value has been taken away from the founders before our invebecause we'll know that too much of the value has been taken away from the founders before our investment.

That's because inflation was constantly eroding the value of each dollar over time regardless of the investment vehicle.

Rajan believes that indexing helps to fuel investment bubbles because new money flowing into such funds is automatically allocated to the companies with the highest market value.

Investors can find a diversity of opinion on a company because professionals and non-professionals alike publish and share their investment ideas on sites such as Seeking Alpha, Motley Fool, GuruFocus, Value Investors Club and SumZero.

But finding value investors for technology start - ups is more difficult because entrepreneurs are approaching their business model, growth goals, and corresponding investment pitch from the success theater pulpit....

All of our funds employ the same value investment philosophy and process because we believe that it is the best way, over a long time period, to maximize profit potential while reducing risk.

We value investors argue that fixed - income investments are risky and artificially overpriced because of government intervention in the bond market.

People remain skeptical about cryptocurrencies role being more than an investment, but Nguyen pointed out that «the value of cryptocurrencies fluctuates because people are speculating.»

the compounder, because it compounds our money for us) or 10 — 20 Ben Graham net - nets (companies purchased for less then their net current asset values just as Benjamin Graham pioneered it over his long and lucrative investment career).

Compounding is when the value of an investment increases because the earnings on your contributions are reinvested and, in turn, may produce even more earnings as time passes.

Most aspiring value investors are intellectually attracted to the investment style because it makes sense intuitively.

Even though most of these funds use the equally - weighted approach in building their investment themes of Value, Momentum and Quality, because of the different inputs, the stock selection will be very different.

And, because you can not tell what the market is going to do, a value investment discipline is important because it is the only approach that produces consistently good investment results over a complete market cycle» Seth Klarman

The reason Munger said that is because investors always see steel companies trading at a low P / E ratio, and think they represent a great value investment.

So, when you're buying shares of a gas ETF, you're essentially betting that the value of gas will rise from the time of your investment, mainly because people need gas and there's no really solid, widespread replacement for it (nor will there be for the foreseeable future).

We enjoy reading VII because it provides in - depth looks into different value investors» investment approaches, using individual stock examples that highlight their thought process.

Wilshere is a similar situation, think Arsenal will be less reluctant to budge on any deals because of the loyalty and investment value of the player, but again depends on his career aspirations.

which is certainly not a slight on the young french national player; like him or not, Sanchez has provided some real world - class performances for club and country in recent years... if you do this move, you need to really clean house or face some serious consequences for the foreseeable future... half measures are rarely rewarded, that's how we got here... tear down the wall... we need to get rid of Giroud, not because he isn't a talented player, his skill - set simply doesn't make sense if we hope to maximize the offensive potential of a quick passing, one - touch scheme... we need to evolve, like Barcelona, who realized you needed to have clinical finishers or face a mind - numbing future of horizontal passes and largely ineffective crosses... Barca went and got Suarez, even though they had Messi and Neymar on the roster (just imagine the possibilities — another in the litany of Wenger «what ifs»)... we need to be as clinical in the boardroom as on the pitch... accept nothing less or move on... personally I would move on from Welbeck, Giroud and Walcott, even Ox if he isn't all in... I think the most intriguing player might be Perez, which runs counter to the thoughts in my head when he arrived late last summer... we need a deep lying DM with quick feet and long ball potential, midfielders who can counter quickly even when they are spread out and 4 or 5 players who know how to attack the lanes (kind of a cross between Barca, Dortmund and Monaco)... this is seriously an achievable goal, one that logically should have been achieved quite a few years ago... did no one in the Arsenal organization see the financial restructuring of the football universe... think of the players we could have had but we weren't willing to cough up the dough only for those individuals to have their value double or triple within a 12 to 24 month period... even if just from an investment perspective these «no deals» represent a failure of monumental proportions... only if you cared, of course

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

I am pretty sure the number of games of Arsenal that are being televised will go down, this will hurt TV revenue and this might wake up Kroenke because it hurts the value of his investment.

This is only because Kroenkes investment value is being damaged under Wenger and a tipping point is now close, I believe.

Communicating science to lay audiences is an important skill for all scientists because, if called upon, we all need to be ready to explain our work or demonstrate the value of public investment in research.

If everybody believes that the stock market is going to go up, the stock market will go up because it will be pushed up by the buying power, even if this is completely wrong on the basis of fundamental analysis, the gross domestic product, employment numbers, sales, investment value, or the real value of the companies.

Definitely worth the investment, because you get so much value out of versatility.

I absolutely love mine, it's a beautiful piece to have and as I told my husband, they're actually a great investment because Chanel handbags never lose their value as the company always puts up prices each year.

But academies have «no real voice» to combat their employer contribution rate because it is calculated by their local pension fund authority according to the average age of staff and value of investments across all of its schools, Hamilton said.

Perhaps the stock got a final nudge the broader investment community needed, because GM has been laying down reason after reason for Wall Street to recognize the company's value for nearly two years.

I like trying to persuade authors of the value of platform — at least when built organically — because it represents a meaningful investment in your lifelong career as an author.

TIPS are considered an extremely low - risk investment since they are backed by the U.S. government and because the par value rises with inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index, while the interest rate remains fixed.

Investments in bonds issued by non-U.S. companies are subject to risks including country / regional risk, which is the chance that political upheaval, financial troubles, or natural disasters will adversely affect the value of securities issued by companies in foreign countries or regions; and currency risk, which is the chance that the value of a foreign investment, measured in U.S. dollars, will decrease because of unfavorable changes in currency exchange rates.

Because bonds are a safer investment, you shouldn't see too much volatility in terms of the value of your account; it'll be relatively stable.