Sentences with phrase «value investment really»

It's just that I didn't want to acknowledge that my deep value investment really didn't have deep value because the barriers to realizing the value were formidable.

Not exact matches

To learn more about how you can use net present value to translate an investment's value into today's dollars, I spoke with Joe Knight, co-author of Financial Intelligence: A Manager's Guide to Knowing What the Numbers Really Mean and co-founder and owner of www.business-literacy.com.

Active Management, Active Share, Investor Return Over the past decade academics have devoted considerable research to investment management, attempting to discern whether active management really provides value to its clients.

Fortunately, it's not impossible — or even all that difficult, really — to estimate the fair value of just about any dividend growth stock out there, putting an investor in the «driver's seat» when it comes to making an intelligent investment decision for the long term.

Unless you really need or especially value the human touch that those services provide, you're probably better off simply choosing low - cost index fund options at a fraction of the bank cost through robo - advisers, which use algorithms to provide automated investment advice, or investment companies (examples of which include Charles Schwab or Vanguard).

Nor do I really care much, as long as I'm able to find a few investment ideas that offer compelling value.

With its focused approach towards financial planning in general and value investing in particular Safal Niveshak posts are really helping me in fine - tuning my investment philosophy.

When I purchased my shares at just over $ 27 in November, I felt I was paying «fair value» and not enjoying the sort of margin of safety that I really like to have with my stock investments.

The majority portion online trading companies are highly concerned and ready to earn profit and never appreciate the value to trader's investment that is really dangerous for traders.

Our investment decisions really have to do with value and measuring and trying to gauge the underlying intrinsic value of a company.

So, when you're buying shares of a gas ETF, you're essentially betting that the value of gas will rise from the time of your investment, mainly because people need gas and there's no really solid, widespread replacement for it (nor will there be for the foreseeable future).

Rather, «Are the people, the organisations, the promises, the values and the relationships you put your faith in day by day, year by year, really worth your investment of trust?»

which is certainly not a slight on the young french national player; like him or not, Sanchez has provided some real world - class performances for club and country in recent years... if you do this move, you need to really clean house or face some serious consequences for the foreseeable future... half measures are rarely rewarded, that's how we got here... tear down the wall... we need to get rid of Giroud, not because he isn't a talented player, his skill - set simply doesn't make sense if we hope to maximize the offensive potential of a quick passing, one - touch scheme... we need to evolve, like Barcelona, who realized you needed to have clinical finishers or face a mind - numbing future of horizontal passes and largely ineffective crosses... Barca went and got Suarez, even though they had Messi and Neymar on the roster (just imagine the possibilities — another in the litany of Wenger «what ifs»)... we need to be as clinical in the boardroom as on the pitch... accept nothing less or move on... personally I would move on from Welbeck, Giroud and Walcott, even Ox if he isn't all in... I think the most intriguing player might be Perez, which runs counter to the thoughts in my head when he arrived late last summer... we need a deep lying DM with quick feet and long ball potential, midfielders who can counter quickly even when they are spread out and 4 or 5 players who know how to attack the lanes (kind of a cross between Barca, Dortmund and Monaco)... this is seriously an achievable goal, one that logically should have been achieved quite a few years ago... did no one in the Arsenal organization see the financial restructuring of the football universe... think of the players we could have had but we weren't willing to cough up the dough only for those individuals to have their value double or triple within a 12 to 24 month period... even if just from an investment perspective these «no deals» represent a failure of monumental proportions... only if you cared, of course

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

«So in order to assess the value of public investments in biomedical research, we really need to understand the linkages between these investments and private sector output.»

It can be hard to find time to date when you're a busy professional working long hours, but we really believe that the Relationship Questionnaire is worth the time investment — after all, it covers all of the core values that'll help your new relationship go the distance.

We never really get to know these guys and are asked to take at face value their investment (and expertise) in art.

Let's say that 10 % of my portfolio is in something really speculative such as bitcoin (speculative for me at least)... now I've said to myself that I'm only prepared to have 10 % of the value of my portfolio in this investment in case it goes bust.

«Especially in an era of low interest rates, low yields, sometimes weaker investment performance, it's really important that a client is getting value for the cost they are paying,» he said.

If you are really a value investor and do deep research, how many investments can you be involved in at the same time?

Low ratios of Enterprise value divided by EBITDA are very effective at identifying promising investments — it indicates cheap assets, and in a time when M&A is hot, it can really pay off.

If someday it really does not, well, no investment will be safe and money will probably have no value anyway.

This is really the core issue with volatility: It can cause your investments to drop in value at the wrong time.

I am really excited about this opportunity to meet fellow value investors and to hear the current investment ideas of several leading professional investors.

The true value of a TFSA is really for people who have 20 + years to grow the contribution room and create a sizable tax free, income generating investment for retirement.

My Journey presents Understanding Losses In Your Portfolio posted at My Journey to Millions, saying, «I don't think most individuals really understand what happens when their investments take a hit and lose value.

In the end, it doesn't really matter if the shares are priced above or below $ 1 so long as you are focusing on great investment opportunities backed by solid value.

If you are really serious about investment, then I would recommend you to read a book called «The Intelligent Investor: The Definitive Book on Value Investing» (affiliate link).

He posts (and reposts) really helpful articles and news on the topics of value investing, trading strategies, investment philosophy, and company analysis.

Margin is great when your investments are going up in value, but the double - edged sword of leverage really hurts when your portfolio heads south.

Has the intrinsic value of RIM really changed so much in the last 90 days that it was rational for an investment analyst to change his recommendation on the shares four times?

Is this really value added investment advice?

I guess I think about stock risk largely as the value investment community does as the possibility of permanent impairment of capital, not really what overall general business and economic conditions are (rail traffic, ECRI, ISM, etc.).

Eventually, as share prices surpass what might reasonably be considered fair value, the story really starts to evolve... Management pitches an ever more ambitious acquisition & investment strategy (debt & pension liabilities are no longer perceived to be a potential risk), and most shareholders are inevitably forced to buy into it... simply to justify the fact they continue holding their shares, despite the escalation in valuations.

Nor do I really care much, as long as I'm able to find a few investment ideas that offer compelling value.

Many investment managers have taken to copying Buffett's approach, but is it really possible to become a value investor by reading a few books and desiring to make money?

OK, I really don't get it... Can someone please explain, and then explain again in words of one syllable: When it comes to foreign value - oriented investment managers, what the hell's so goddamn sexy about Irish Continental?

There really are so many factors you could take into the calc of whether or not it's a good investment that it makes my head spin... There's Time value of money, tax deductions, interest paid, investment return if you invest the difference up front, investment return if you invest what would have been your mortgage payments after you're done paying off the mortgage, etc. etc..

After de-listing, a regular company & its strategy may evolve v differently, but there's really only one obvious objective for an investment company: To realize intrinsic value, as a single end - result, or on a periodic basis.

I think the panic about the cash bleed could result in a price that provides a really good value investment... if they just don't run out of liquidity, that is.

That in itself is a novelty; I tend to stay away from technology related businesses because I can never really get my head around the products and services they offer, I don't feel I can fully evaluate their competitive advantages, the potential impact of obsolescence and the level capital expenditures necessary to maintain market position, not to speak of the fact that they rarely fit into my value profile for potential investments.

Since mortgage REITs are really just a portfolio of leveraged debt investments, book value is everything.

I have two investments that I'm really proud of, and both were solid value plays.

The problem with most value stocks is they're essentially slow - motion event - driven investments — management and / or the business clearly aren't creating / compounding value, so what you're really betting on is the potential closing * of a value gap... and your IRR gets worse & worse with every passing year.

Interesting, I'd never really thought about the value investing strategy of using the dividends for other investments.

Right now, I really need to make good investments and those new friends will help me to push it to the 300k value.

Is it really a stretch to believe that the law societies might be interested in funding development of secondary sources if the value - for - investment equation?

This really makes it easier to evaluate where to make investments in our product that consistently deliver high - value features to our customers.

While this permanent product doesn't really have a huge investment aspect, it does accumulate cash value, which is mostly used to keep the premiums level for the length of the policy.

In addition to the guaranteed rate of growth, the component that really hastens the growth of the cash value account investment is dividend payments from the life insurance company to the policy owner.