Sentences with phrase «value judgements as»

Not exact matches

The buyer seems positive and eager to get started with the proposal (suspiciously enough, without raising concerns or objections), and the salesperson takes that at face value, letting emotions cloud their judgement and forecasting the deal as a «sure thing.»

Tacia that is true one of my favorite verses is if we love him we will obey him thats how we express our love for him he does nt want sacrifice he wants obedience but not out of fear of judgement but because we love him with all our hearts and want to do all we can to show that we appreciate what he has done for us.The woman who offered the few mites gave everything she had the rich people gave out of there abundance.Big difference it wasnt the value it was the attitude she gave her all to God and God honored her.The verse that comes to mind that sums it all up that we are to love the Lord with all our hearts mind soul and strength and love our neighbours as ourselves.brentnz

Was asking in connection to your statement: our value judgements depend on what we use as the grounds of our position.

Morality can progress or digress... our value judgements depend on what we use as the grounds of our position.

However, as a society, we can support their choices by making sure that everyone has access to reliable information and by creating a positive environment so that breastfeeding mothers aren't subject to social stigmas or value judgements for doing what, after all, is only natural.

According to Mr. Prempeh, the majority judgement in the election petition case, which he described as being «of dubious value,» failed to answer questions which could be relevant to the conduct of future elections.

As a result, declaring a planet lifeless is a value judgement — a question of where you draw the line and say «that's good enough», Persson says.

She brings the values and judgements of reality into the blissfully ignorant innocence of Seven Oaks, and she is plain annoying at times as a result.

Included in the PowerPoint: a) Scarcity, Choice and Opportunity Cost - The Fundamental Economic Problem - The Meaning of Scarcity and the inevitability of choices at all levels (individual, firms, govt)- The basic questions of what will be produced ow and for whom - The Meaning of the term «Ceteris Paribus» - The Margin and Decision Making at the Margin - Sort run, long run, very long run b) Positive and Normative Statements - the distinction between fact and value judgements c) Factors of Production - the rewards to the factors of production: land, labour, capital and enterprise - Specialization and division of labour d) Resource Allocation in Different Economic Systems and Issues of Transition - decision making in market, planned and mixed economies - the role of the factor enterprise in a modern economy e) Production Possibility Curves - shape and shifts of the curve - constant and increasing opportunity costs f) Money - functions and characteristics in a modern economy - barter, cash and bank deposits, cheques, near money, liquidity g) Classification of Goods and Services - free goods, private goods (economic goods) and public goods - merit goods and demerit goods as the outcome of imperfect information by consumers PowerPoint Also Includes: - Key Terms for each Chapter - Activities - Multiple Choice and Essay questions from past exam papers.

As the 360 - degree video footage is always being recorded, no one relies on memory or snap value judgements in the moment.

As head of Ofsted, it should be expected he would value his own inspectors» judgement.

It is the responsibility of the buyer to have thoroughly inspected the vehicle, and to have satisfied himself or herself as to the condition and value and to bid based upon that judgement solely.

I place no value judgement on that other than to say they are as often wrong as they are right.

Depending on the value of the loan (or the value you want to recoup), you might be able to go through small claims court where you don't need as much proof to get a judgement.

The consensus in climate science is that recent climate change is overwhelmingly identified as anthropogenic in cause, and furthermore (as per AAR5 on Impacts) there is a consensus that climate change will have significant impacts that while a value judgement can quite reasonably be described as «dangerous».

The amount of different material that was in the paper, was far more than I could possibly research to verify, or find more detail on; so I typically take those articles at face value, and assume the author / s know what they are talking about; So I made no Judgement of Ruddiman as a result; I thought the idea was interesting.

Leading companies worldwide have come to understand that the damaging, often unaccounted - for repercussions of modern business — famously called externalities — such as atmospheric carbon, toxic materials and poisoned rivers, arise from design decisions and value judgements.

How do those who argue for «values» as a primary input to policy analysis justify the cost of values judgements that cause government to waste huge amounts of public money funding irrational policies — such as carbon pricing and incentives for renewable energy?

As the interpretation of infinity in economic climate models is essentially a debate about how to deal with the threat of extinction, Mr Weitzman's argument depends heavily on a judgement about the value of life... A lack of reliable data exacerbates the profound methodological and philosophical difficulties faced by climate change economists... The United Nations conference in Paris this December offers a chance to take appropriate steps to protect future generations from this risk... http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2015/07/climate-change (MOST COMMENTING ARE NOT AT ALL IMPRESSED)

As it presumes such a value judgement, the oft - used term «catastrophe» has no place within the scientific debate on climate change.

It's precisely because of people recognising that science is just as full of value judgements and fraud and nonsense as everything else; and that science is just as capable of being wrong as anything else, that they demand such rigorous study of any hypothesis.

To say that Colose states his opinion «as fact» makes little sense, except by considering that Brian Shollenberger conflates judgements of fact and of value.

We all make judgements as to the value of these discussions all the time.

Cases I have represented the Defendant on include Verlade v Guy's & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust [2017] a high value brain injury claim relating to pediatric intensive care which was successfully defended and AS v Guy's & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust [2017] a significant Bolam judgement concerning pioneering techniques used in pediatric cardiac surgery in 1998 in which liability was repudiated on the grounds that there was no established body of opinion on brain cooling at the time.

If you think about it, this makes sense from an ability to negotiate perspective, with the logic being that the Plaintiff wants to get as close to full value as they can, and the defense needs their client to think they've saved them from some huge judgement.

By rendering our Judgements as clear, as accessible, and as comprehensible, as possible we place that which is of value in them in sharper focus: rather than diminishing our Judgments, it would enhance them.

«These photos should not be considered as trade secrets, more just confidential information,...» and»... but it was only a few photos of the interior that doesn't exactly constitute as trade secrets» are meaningless judgements of the value of photos; the determination of the value of the photos as trade secrets would be made by a jury when / if there is a prosecution under 18 USC 1832.

A Dutch court judgement classified Bitcoin as a «transferable value», a positive sign toward mainstream adoption.

I am very interested in topics like Emotional Intelligence and Myers - Briggs Assessments as well as Hartman Value Profiles which measure judgement.

And: Why did you choose «relationship success» (success implying a sort of positive value judgement) as a term for what you measured?

Accordingly, the value judgement implicit in the account that follows should be borne in mind; as far as possible, we have taken care to distinguish between what is prescriptive and what is descriptive.

Thus, it is accepted that for justice to be served there must be an element of substantive equality, and that to rely on formal equality is to deny justice.18 As Professor Peter Bailey has pointed out, «adopting the principle of substantive equality leads to difficult value judgements and distinctions, but in the interests of justice and human rights, there is no escape from this course.»