Sentences with phrase «value managers did»

Well, no surprise that value managers did badly 2007 to the present.

But what the value managers did not appreciate was that a lot of the outperformance of financials stemmed from the willingness of the Fed to engage in a reckless monetary policy that never allowed recessions to clear away the bad debt, and thus the debt / GDP ratio kept on building.

Hsu, Myers, and Whitby (2014) show that from 1991 to 2013 value managers did capture a premium versus the S&P 500 when measured by the buy - and - hold return.

I find the move to unconstrained mandates to be a return to what value managers did long ago, but in a more complex fixed income environment.

Most value managers don't care for momentum.

Not exact matches

If the managers that are supporting your reps don't recognize the value in a new technology, that will trickle down throughout your team.

On the negative side, people who work for autocratic managers often feel as though their contributions are not valued by the organization and decisions often don't consider how it will affect employees other than the manager.

To do so, the hiring manager interprets the value of past experience and education and imagines how that might apply to the open job position.

GREENBLATT: Well you know I taught at Columbia as I mentioned for the last 22 years and so I tell my students that first day of class actually, I tell them that you know I don't think there's a lot of social value in being an investment manager, it's not that I don't think investors who do work set help set prices and allocate capital and all those things, but I just think A, they're not very good at it, and B, it'll get done without you.

Yet the idea that corporate managers should make maximizing shareholder value their goal — and that boards should ensure that they do — is relatively recent.

Value investors care very deeply about what they're buying; in fact, they don't buy stocks, but rather shares of high quality businesses with talented, honest, energetic managers.

The fund's manager does a good job allocating capital to higher - quality companies with lower relative valuations, the cornerstone of the value investing discipline.

Given the whipsaw that I experienced in 2002 when the ratings agencies went from long - to short - term, I can tell you it did not add value, and that most bond manager that I knew wanted stability.

So in addition to following the managers who owned the high - flying technology and consumer brand companies, I kept in touch with what the value managers were doing, including Francis Chou, Seth Klarman (Baupost Group), Mason Hawkins and his team (Longleaf Funds), and Jeremy Grantham and James Montier at GMO.

If we do get two other rental properties in our current area, they will be cash flow positive even with a manager, otherwise we won't get involved (plus the home values and payments will be much lower).

With so many cheap stocks to choose from in 2009, even value managers who didn't want to buy financials could easily build a portfolio full of cheap stocks and wait for regression to the mean.

A. Warren Buffett is a value investor (buying stocks / businesses below their intrinsic value) and a values manager (only doing business with high character managers).

A 2012 study from Robert Baird shows that while 59 per cent of active managers added value over one year, 73 per cent did so over five - year periods.

Many of the managers that own stocks in the S&P 500 universe, such as the Value Investor shown above, also own securities that do not fall into that universe.

Failure shouldn't necessarily be blamed on transfers.It's part of the reason but is not the only reasons.Other clubs which can't even buy like Arsenal have won very good trophies.Even at those times we were in debt we had a good team capable of winning the EPL or winng some of the smaller trophies.But we just went on trophyless.Now we are almost debt free and we are promised glory but honestly we don't even have the hope of glory.The only thing that can save us is renewal of the mind of the manager and board.That will bring a positive change.It's only insanity to keep doing the same thing and expect different results.We have a lot to prove out there to the world because the greatness of Arsenal has really gone down in the face of the world.They only see us as a team with good football that's all.The world doubts us and we have a point to prove.The values of a club is as important as winning trophies.If not Arsenal wouldn't have been this top club that people talk about everyday were it fpr only values or trophies.They go hand in hand.However, to the world trophies are very important and that fact can not be hidden.

I don't care the reasons, it's just negativity toward a club and recently a manager with values.

Finally, not to many comment on Bilic @ West Ham but surely he has done an impressive job as well, showing what value added an ambitious modern manager can bring to a club, same for Koeman who lost many of his best players after is arrival yet has managed to keep Southampton in a very respectable place in the table.

If there is one thing I value as Arsenal manager, it is that when we lose, we don't see it as a negative.

All this is accepted blindly as being the norms of football for no other reason than it is what the Market wants and does (sic ``... like «trading», football is a results business»)-- indeed these values are lauded and held up on high so that we now reach the point here when even a truly great manager is being subjected to a witch - hunt by sections of the media and so - called fans who question his tenure of his post and ask what has he got to do to be sacked.

Did you expect a top level manager to just spend money without due regard for the value he would get from such an investment?

The funds that those sales could bring in could largely be spent now, so if the estimated income from X player sales should be # 100mil, spend # 75 mil of that now from the cash reserves and then work hard on recouping that money from the average that needs to go... Values was an example and not what I think they are worth XD That area could also deal with contracts, take the pay structure away from the manager and into the club, ensure we do not have this issue again when a new manager feels it is the right direction and has no one to stop him.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

The selling list would be huge: * Podolski (Get some money while we can, he has huge wage and hardly plays) * Campbell (Manager does not want to play him and he has resale value) * Flamini (Free to go) * Diaby (free to go — will he ever play) * Monreal (get some money, we have upgraded the LB) * Coquelin (free to go) * Jenkinson (Get some money, Bellerin has more promise) * Ryo (free to go) * Wellington (Free to go) * Afobe (free to go) * Rosicky (some value left in his contract)

On a tangent Jon my son (he's 4) asked me why he should support Arsenal, I said «well because I do, you're granddad does and your great granddad did» I was going to say its because of the values and principles that our club has but then I stopped myself because I have no idea what they are anymore other than paying a has been manager and over hyped players a fortune for non achievement while being owned by a majority shareholder that has no interest in the club other than as a business and having a board that view the fans as the gift that keeps on giving.

Why do people think that we will get Simone or some other manager who is at a club that values them more will come to us and be forced to make a profit first?

much like when a country can't divulge highly classified information publicly for obvious economic and military reasons, a professional soccer organization must keep certain things in - house so they don't devalue a player, expose a weakness, provide info that could give an opposing club leverage in future negotiations and / or give them vital intel regarding a future match, but when dishonesty becomes the norm the relationship between cub and fan will surely deteriorate... in our particular case, our club has done an absolutely atrocious job when it comes to cultivating a healthy and honest relationship with the media or their fans, which has contributed greatly to our lack of success in the transfer market... along with poor decisions involving weekly wages, we can't ever seem to get true market value for most of our outgoing players and other teams seem to squeeze every last cent out of us when we are looking to buy; why wouldn't they, when you go to the table with such a openly desperate and dysfunctional team like ours, you have all the leverage; made even worse by the fact that who wouldn't want to see our incredibly arrogant and thrifty manager squirm during the process... the real issue at this club is respect, a word that appears to be entirely lost on those within our hierarchy... this is the starting point from which all great relationships between club and supporters form... this doesn't mean that a team can't make mistakes along the way, that's just human nature, it's about how they chose to deal with these situations that will determine if this relationship flourishes or devolves..

The manager's inability to employ tactical coaching methods, which end in stagnation of players and devaluation of their sell - on value, the evidence this season is that we do not have a player that can command a hefty transfer fee in this season of increased television rights revenue and with the exception of Alexis Sanchez, none of our players from this squad is valued above 50 million pounds.

«All the managers know the value of this kind of player — maybe the media don't talk too much about them or how important they are,» the City boss added.

Of course, that might have nothing to do with Lasogga, but managers that value their position in a team don't bench strikers who score hat - tricks, no matter the pedigree of the player coming back from injury.

«This bill does not represent American values,» wrote Charlotte Gossett Navarro, regional outreach manager for the state Immigration Coalition.

Furthermore, a survey of 261 hiring managers found that while employers value competence and commitment among men applicants, they are prone to gravitate toward women applicants who are perceived as likable — those who did fine, but did not excel, academically.

But to do all this, of course, we need to acquire human tissues, so to facilitate donations our procurement manager, Jacki Trafford, and I approach clinicians and explain the value of human tissues in research.

Whether you need a young professional or a seasoned manager, we can give your course that extra production value and engagement that you didn't think you could afford.

Also, short resources that helped managers get from «not knowing» to «doing» in the shortest possible time demonstrated that their time was respected and valued.

But at this juncture in his life he did not think that he either (a) had the time, interest, and energy to devote to researching and in effect «trading managers» by trading funds and (b) did not think he had any special skill set or insights that would add value in that process that would justify the time, the one resource he could not replace.

The argument of a full - or over-valuation of stocks backfires when applied to the existing equity holdings of a fund: If at present the manager does not want to use the surplus cash to add to these positions, this implies that they have a limited appreciation potential, are fully valued or even over-valued.

We're actually software engineers from Silicon Valley, and we decided to take charge of our own investment accounts after the Tech Bubble crash in 2002, when we realized that most professional money managers do not add any significant value.

Some of the dumbest things I have seen in my life inside corporations revolve around incompetent managers, who don't have the foggiest idea how to grow value organically, and use a variety of...

Unless I am missing some value indicators (inside ownership, buybacks, additional highly qualified managers, a catalyst), I don't see this as an attractive investment.

Looking at the audited values of accounts of a subset of managers is not valid — we would need to look at all accounts following the same theory, and unsuccessful accounts don't line up to be identified.

If you are going to pay an Asset Manager up to 1.5 % per year just to act as a middle man for your investments, I don't think you are getting good value on your 1.5 %.

I remember being struck by his advice to managers thinking of starting another 1940 Act mutual fund — «Don't start another large cap value fund just like every other large cap value fund.»

In David's inaugural column on Amazon money and markets «Trees Do Not Grow To The Sky», he calls attention to: «If interest rates and inflation move quickly up, the market value of the bonds that you (or your bond fund manager) hold can drop like a rock.»

Don't we see value - driven hedge funds and professional managers beating the S&P 500 in many instances?

Greenblatt, managing partner of Gotham Capital and author of The Little Book That Beats the Market, offers his own commentary throughout the pages, as do Christopher Davis, portfolio manager of the Davis Large Cap Value fund, and Seth Klarman, president of The Baupost Group and a well - respected value inveValue fund, and Seth Klarman, president of The Baupost Group and a well - respected value invevalue investor.