Sentences with phrase «value metric because»

Use the earnings yield as a return and value metric because it's simple and provides critical information that can be compared to any other investment asset.

Not exact matches

Validating your branding efforts with emotional - value metrics is unavoidably a blend of intuition and analytics because brand loyalty is anything but rational.

If you are meaningfully driving one of those metrics, an employer is going to do whatever they can to pay you more because there's so much value for them on the backend.

Companies like to use EPS as a performance metric because it is the primary focus of financial analysts when assessing the value of a stock and of investors when evaluating their return on investment.

However, Buffett has noted that the metric has underrepresented Berkshire's intrinsic value because of the number of operating businesses Berkshire has acquired, which are held on the books at cost.

Understanding the industry is very helpful when valuing companies because different industries might have more useful valuation metrics than others.

It can place me in the «caricature» camp for value managers, because my valuation metrics are usually lower than most.

Enterprise value is a key metric for value investors because it represents the total value of a company and is capital structure neutral.

Investors find the P / B ratio useful because the book value of equity provides a relatively stable and intuitive metric that can be easily compared to the market price.

Because your book advocates single value metrics.

Do not think you can assume the label «Value Investor» just because you use these value metValue Investor» just because you use these value metvalue metrics.

Because GARP investors straddle the gap between value and growth investors, they use metrics from both schools to find appropriate investments.

That said, for long - term dividend growth investors it doesn't matter which group you belong to because two of the most important metrics, position value and dividend income, remain the same regardless of your dividend reinvestment accounting method (see below).

I like equal weighting because it forces you to be contrarian and buy more of a declining position when the value metrics are still attractive.

Confederation Life had gone insolvent the August prior, and I noticed that fewer and fewer stable value funds wanted to purchase my GICs, because our firm was small, and as such, did not get a good credit rating, despite excellent credit metrics.

Of course, I have no idea what motivated TOT's actual share repurchase, but I don't need to — because I have my own Intrinsic Value for TOT, and / or other companies, I can quickly determine whether current or future share repurchases are at a discount to this Value and therefore attractive — in the case of TOT, based on current metrics, the more share buybacks the merrier!

There are some stocks which may appear cheap because they are trading at a low valuation metrics such as PE, price to book value ratio, cash flow ratio etc..

Yes, good point re IRSA — something to monitor closely — I didn't mention in my posts, but the main reason I focus on IRSA's Market Value is because I'd actually like to see CRESY sell out and focus completely on farmland, so IRSA Market Value (high, or low) is the most relevant metric, I believe.

Because Glacier Media appears cheap across the standard value metrics, it serves as a perfect example of how stock screens are just a starting point for value investors.

However if at years end stocks are now considered 10 % over valued by those same metrics and your stock allocation is now at 55 % because of the returns then rather than adjusting back down to 50 % perhaps now you adjust your reasonable allocation percentage down to 45 % to reflect to over-valuation that is inherent in the current valuation of the stock market.

The world economists don't put a value on all of those social and environmental goods, partially because they're hard to quantify, but also partially because our economy is fixated on one metric, which is money.

Our knowledge base, however, is insufficient to quantify the effects of climate change on many of these metrics because of conceptual challenges posed by climate change to standard assumptions, as well as practical data and methodological hurdles; insufficient understanding of how such metrics capture the way people actually feel; and, for non-monetized values, sometimes resistance to calculating them at all (Sussman et al 2014, Neumann and Strzepek 2014).

In his last email exchange, Wallace offers to close out the FOIA because the email string «clarified that your subject paper (and especially the «History» segment of the associated time series pH curve) did not rely upon either data or other contemporary representations for global ocean pH over the period of time between the first decade of 1900 (when the pH metric was first devised, and ocean pH values likely were first instrumentally measured and recorded) through and up to just before 1988.»

Incumbents often don't embrace disrupters because they have different metrics for value and performance.

It's hard to argue with metrics because they show the value you create for the employer.

I only pay attention to cap rate on multi families, not SFR, simply because those are sold based on comps, so no one is gonna sell to me just because my cap rate says their value should be «X,» and there's no means to find out what the average cap rate is for SFR's, since it isn't a metric commonly associated w / SFR's, at least in my experience.