Sentences with phrase «value of a game when»

Over the years a major debate has raged between fans of traditional entertainment mediums such as films and TV, and fans of video games, namely over the artistic value of a game when compared to a movie, book, or TV show.

Not exact matches

If fans will not boycott the games and stop paying for the tickets then let us at least unite and tell Silent Stan that the CEO is not making him the money that he could, if Silent Stan starts to see Gazidis as a loss to profit then maybe we can get an ambitious CEO in who will help us be ambitious and win titles, use that then to get better business done and add to the value of the clubs assets (players), remove the lowest value players (not good enough for AFC) and replace them with high value assets which will increase in value when we are winning / truly competing at the highest level.

We're not saying that all home teams are bad value (although they are historically overvalued), but when they're playing on the second night of a back - to - back and their third game in five days, it makes sense that there would be value to fading these teams.

It would be nice to be able to get value out of switching on whichever game has the best or most interesting players at any given time, though on the other hand baseball probably saps enough of my productivity when I'm watching / following at most one game per day.

I respect what all three did as Raiders, especially Jano and Condo since they played longer, but it's wasted money when the replacement value of those positions has almost zero impact on winning football games.

The value derived from betting against the public is directly correlated with the number of bets placed on the game so, naturally, it's more lucrative to bet against the public when the volume of bets increases during the postseason.

I have also found that West Coast teams have provided additional value against East Coast teams when playing at home in the first game of a new series.

Other than that, I don't see a lot of value in drafting a guy who can't play all three downs when the NFL keeps changing the rules to favor the passing game.

As I found when researching NBA second half betting strategies, the value derived from betting against the public is directly correlated with the number of bets placed on a game.

The reason why nobody takes us ARSENAL fans seriously is because there are a few here that had the balls of calling on Sanchez to be sold, underperformer, rubbish, when reality is him and Ozil are the only reasons why we are still relevant, then of course when we call on the real underperformer Le Fraud they call us cry babies, ungrateful and all kind of nonsense...... Two (2) things were left clear from today's game OG is no striker and Campbell should ask his agent to start looking for another team where he will be valued for his worth

When you begin you'll go through growing pains, you'll find where good value picks are and where a trap game might be after a certain amount of time.

@charlie, take movement and finishing out of Ronaldo's game and see the player you will have, ronaldo without finishing and movement will be just a poor mans WELBECK, so don't dear under value finishing when it comes to forwards.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Many readers may be wondering how there could ever be value betting the under when the average runs per game have been higher than the average total in each of the past 12 seasons, but there's a finite number of runs by which the game can go under, while there is no limit to how many runs can be scored in a game.

Casual bettors place far too much value on the AP Top 25, and they seem to believe the best course of action is simply taking the points and hoping for a competitive game when two ranked teams play each other.

Now many people may be wondering how there could ever be value betting the under when the average runs per game has been higher than the average total in each of the past ten seasons.

My value play on West Brom lost in the final minutes of stoppage time when Watford scored to level the game 2 - 2, but still a solid start to the season.

Or, to put it in another way, Theo may be better than Sterling now (I think he is when on top of his game) but he won't have much resale value in 3 years or so, particularly as he is injury prone and relies heavily on pace.

On the other hand, value increases the more lopsided a game gets, highlighted by an ATS win rate of 54.2 % and profit of more than 24 units when the percentage of tickets wagered dips to 40 % and below.

Liverpool showed the value of playing fewer games than your rivals in 2013/2014 when the Scousers were only a Steven Gerrard slip and Demba Ba finish away from winning their first Premier League title.

Blind was equally of most value, if not crucial, when out of possession as he would instigate Ajax's pressing game (or «pressure play»): making the pitch as small as possible (compressing and closing down all space), enabling them to retain possession and win the ball back, at times, mercilessly — more often than not by provoking their opponents into making a mistake.

value winning over safety, so much so that they are willing to risk the health of their «star» athletes for the sake of team success by employing a double standard when it comes to concussion safety - one for regular players, another, more lienient one for «stars» - which helps them justify putting a key player who has been «dinged» or «had his bell rung» back into the game.

Waldorf education is being discovered by an ever - broadening group of parents, who value the many traditional aspects of the education that remind them of what school was like when they grew up — music, art, recess, movement and games.

There are times when we discount the value of going to a basketball game or attending that one dance practice before the big recital.

Most web developers understand the value of marketing when it comes to acquiring game downloads and, in time, making a profit.

tsk tsk this game was a waste of my alounce 10 $ for a game thant seem extremely lazy the has a small map god awful mod support no replay value however i had a little fun at the start it quickly got old and for the price im better o getting something else its like mine craft it looks really fun but when you play it it is really lame

Sure, it has a few nominal quirks, but when push comes to shove, this game puts on an entertaining show with value that far exceeds its budget pricing, thanks to a sizeable campaign and a fun selection of eight unlockable arcade - style mini-games.

After the bug fixes with a patch this sequel exceeds the original in every aspect.Better graphics, gamplay and story along with 2 completely different playable protaganists give Dishonered 2 more replay value then almost every triple A title this year.And this time around I did nt feel pushed to play the game in any specific way.I felt that playing stealthily was alot more rewarding then the first entry but i never felt that i was playing wrong or was being punished when i played a full on assault playthrough.Also there are several ending for every playstyle for both characters which really drive you toward a second, third or even forth playthrough and in all the chaos or silence of each level, even on my forth run, I reimagined every situation and experienced different outcomes every single time.Dishonored 2 also contains some of the best level design I have ever seen with the likes of the amazing and masterfully thought out Clockwork Mansion level being among my all time favorites.Dishonored 2 truly is a masterpiece in almost every ascpect!!!

The voice acting especially is a very nice addition to every game and when done correctly as in the case of Red Faction 2 it really helps the game's value.

Now for a lot of people gameplay depth doesn't matter, all they want is to feel powerful when they hit things or see cool animations for spells / attacks which this game definitely provides, as well as for gamers who highly value things outside of gameplay such as the points i mentioned earlier.

When asked to comment on the amount gamers could potentially spend on Disney Infinity «s numerous Play Sets and character packs, Day said: «I think the value proposition here is really quite good because normally, when Disney releases a new film, there would be another game associated with that that would be upwards of #When asked to comment on the amount gamers could potentially spend on Disney Infinity «s numerous Play Sets and character packs, Day said: «I think the value proposition here is really quite good because normally, when Disney releases a new film, there would be another game associated with that that would be upwards of #when Disney releases a new film, there would be another game associated with that that would be upwards of # 50.

Kind of the perfect game when there isn't anything better to play, but one of questionable value otherwise.

Gamers are conditioned to be a cynical bunch, especially when it comes to big publishers and console makers peeling off digital copies of older games, but this year held strong value for PlayStation Plus subscribers, particularly those looking for new experiences.

Our reasoning is that, when assessing the monetary value of a free offer, one title should count only once, particularly as PlayStation Plus has many cross-buy titles where acquiring a game on one platform entitles the owner to the same game on another.

James Caan appears late in the game as a President incapable of pronouncing «nuclear,» but the thrust of the picture is documenting human frailty and celebrating the value of grace when the easy road is paved with rancour and snark.

Using the classic pen and paper game of Dots / Squares / Fences (or any other name it may go by), children play the game and when they have secured a square they calculate the value of the square.

I'd always been aware of how effective memory games could be, but it was only when I started teaching primary school pupils that I saw their true value and power.

Even when they believe in the value of academics, teenagers may still prefer to spend their energy on the more - compelling activities competing for their attention — friends, sports, afterschool jobs, Snapchat, video games, not to mention less - wholesome pursuits.

But even when they believe in the value of academics, teenagers may still prefer to spend their energy on the more - compelling activities competing for their attention — friends, sports, afterschool jobs, Snapchat, video games, not to mention less - wholesome pursuits.

Just as with any Game of Thrones character, you can not be certain when value's fortunes will change or what the catalyst for such a change will be.

Another important point to consider is that history has shown that a lack of financial interest in the property or «skin in the game» might make it easier for a borrower to walk away from the property when faced with economic adversity like a job loss, or a loss in property value.

When computed, the average of the expected payoffs across all these alternative realities, one got an expected value of $ 5,000, the same as Game 1.

People who are new to investing in stocks or in a mutual fund would try to monitor the value of their investments on a daily basis hoping to get into the game when the price is low and get out when the price is high.

When the dog does potty outside, praise enthusiastically and reward either with high value food (hot dog, chicken meat, etc) or a game of fetch etc..

To recap — when told by a fan of Destiny that he isn't going to «buy the game and the two DLCs all over again» for the sake of some new emotes and items, he's essentially told by Smith that he doesn't appreciate its «value».

Of course if you consider value for money to be a lengthy game then you might want to wait for a sale before picking this one, but if you're a proponent of quality over quantity such as me then I think you'll appreciate the game ending when it doeOf course if you consider value for money to be a lengthy game then you might want to wait for a sale before picking this one, but if you're a proponent of quality over quantity such as me then I think you'll appreciate the game ending when it doeof quality over quantity such as me then I think you'll appreciate the game ending when it does.

Usually when I write a review I'll just add the value for money in the score bar at the bottom and not mention much about it other than in a summary, this games pricing has been set up differently to what we usually see, for example you can buy the full game for about # 30 OR if you're an online multiplayer fanatic and only want to play that part of the game you can buy the Multiplayer version for # 20, now if you've bought the multiplayer and fancy expanding to the full game it will cost you # 15 for the single player being # 5 over the original price, most will think that this is fair, you can get the multiplayer element cheaper and test it out, if you like it you can then grab the campaign, well, this is where it gets dark.

While I still feel the system is on the expensive side for something that may only last 5 - 7 years, the game itself is a value when compared to the total cost of Mario Kart 8 and all its DLC.

If it isn't a triple - A open world game that can last forever — thus creating an unlimited sense of value even if you only experience a fraction of it, and even if the rest is terrible — why bother buying it when you can play a game for free almost indefinitely?

Nintendo Land is one of the better exclusives available for the Wii U. Lots of replay value is hidden within the game, but the game is at its best when four to five players can monopolize the multi-player attractions, and in order to do that, each player needs their own Wii remote that retails for ~ $ 30 apiece.