Sentences with phrase «value of money says»

The time value of money says that...

Not exact matches

«It's always hard to know exactly where to put your money these days given how rates and spreads are so low, but on a relative basis we still think there's value in EM debt,» Matt Tucker, head of the iShares fixed income strategy team, said this week during a panel discussion at the Morningstar ETF Conference in Chicago.

«With EEDAR estimating current League of Legends revenues to be more than $ 1 billion per year, this means that the value of Riot is significantly higher than $ 1 billion and Tencent would have paid a lot of money for the remaining 7 % of the company's shares,» Walker says.

Only 1 % of those who pay say they think their subscription is too expensive for what they get, and 48 % of digital subscribers say they feel they are getting a «very good value» for the money.

Goldfein said part of the reason for that continued slide was that money was not the main focus for many pilots but rather the «value proposition» of working with highly skilled people on meaningful missions.

and my response is [that] a company should have values because a company is a collection of people,» Cook said on Mad Money.

They have a small group of friends who share brilliant ideas and may co-invest or make strategic introductions,» Povlitz has witnessed.She says they understand that people and information have as much value as money, and that real wealth involves the right combination and proper use of each.

Mobileye N.V., whose collision - avoidance technology has been adopted in cars made by the likes of BMW AG and General Motors Co., said on Sunday it had raised money from five investors that valued its equity at $ 1.5 billion, highlighting the market potential for driver - assistance systems.

«Woz» earlier said at a Money 20/20 event in Las Vegas he «admired» bitcoin from the outset and considers it a potentially better store of value than gold or the US dollar.

Think of Bitcoin, they say, as digital gold — a so - called «store of value» that, like the precious metal itself, doesn't need to have a lot of practical uses to be worth a lot of money.

A broad surge in cryptocurrency values pushed the original recipe north of $ 40 billion in late May, but a long - standing issue that limits the system's capacity has left it struggling to give users what it says on the tin: a cheap, quick way to move money.

«For instance, Friedland says that Glassdoor employees donate the value of one of the company - provided lunches per month, opting to buy their own meal so that the money can go to a local charity.»

While nobody disputes the value of Habitat for Humanity's work, he said, the rest of the money raises questions about how it was decided who would be cut a cheque.

Benson said the amount of money Marin homeowners pay in property tax is less driven by the actual tax rate and more driven by the value of the real estate.

Regardless of the options chosen, «the client knows that a portion of the money will be protected from loss, and that there is an opportunity for the account value to grow,» Connelly said.

So the more money you go and raise when you don't have any revenue yet, as people observe if they ever watched Dragons» Den or Shark Tank, is the more of the business you give up — because they say well, your business has no value.

«Since the value of your retirement account is declining in a bear market, the best strategy is to take no money out,» he said.

«One Pay FX uses blockchain - based technology to provide a fast, simple and secure way to transfer money internationally — offering value, transparency, and the trust and service customers expect from a bank like Santander, said Ana Botín, executive chairman of Banco Santander.

«If you said, «You have to either invest your money in Europe or in the U.S.,» I find better value in Europe,» Marc Faber, editor and publisher of «The Gloom, Boom & Doom Report,» recently told ETF.com.

So I don't think it's a surprise that when Donald Trump gets up and says, «I'm going to give you free benefits and I'm going to get rid of the rules, that I'm going to unshackle banks so that they can make more money again'that they're value would go up.»

Businesses love getting swarmed by hip insidery customers who've already committed to spending money (and Groupon says its customers spend an average of 60 percent above the value of the coupon).

When asked what they find most valuable in financial products, 85 % of respondents said one that «provides a source of tax - free income in retirement,» followed by 78 % who value one that «provides tax - free money for family / loved ones» and 68 % who want a product that «provides the ability to use the funds to pay for college.»

«All of these Canadian companies offer goods and services that offer real value for money, giving them tangible GCAs,» says Danielle Goldfarb.

Erlend: I got this email from an ex-girlfriend the other day and she said im tired of making all the people rich, and I replied that I said well, if you want to make more money, you are going to add more value, you got to help more people and a lot of people do not understand that about business that like people that are like yourself that are having income streams and money and do not understand that like that you are making this money because you are providing value in the world.so what are some of the steps that people can take to move forwards?

In fact, I venture to say that by having money in your bank account, your probability of losing part of its value is 100 %.

The way it works is we can send real world items such as money or any kind of value or asset digitally from our phones and computers over a peer to peer network with no need for a financial infrastructure so no fees and no controlling powers saying what we can and can't be done with the currency we earn.

The researchers said the findings support the notion «that many religions emphasise the value of being prudent with money.»

Administrators, who have been said to be able to resist any temptation but money, clearly had a good deal of self - interest in recognizing the values of pluralism and disestablishment.

Will not the bookseller say: My dear child, your toy is not worth anything; it is true that when you still had the money you could have bought the book instead of the toy, but a toy is a peculiar kind of thing, for once it is bought it loses all value.

«We're matching prices on milk, but the point of difference at Sainsbury's will always be the values in our supply chain - giving our customers both value for money and the values they expect,» said a statement issued by the retailer.

He said the «peanut butter approach» of spreading marketing investment into all of the company's brands was not working with Treasury Wine's getting better value for money by supporting its key premium brands and some bottom end commercial wines that are popular with consumers.

In terms of value for money, I'd say that their prices are definitely on the higher side — but not unjustifiable given the high quality ingredients, novel dishes and decent portion sizes (on most dishes).

UK supermarket Tesco says it has seen sales of its premium, organic and fair - trade products return to growth this year, as special offers on top notch goods convince shoppers that they are good value for money.

The managing director of Angove, John Angove, is weary of hearing people say (and write) that Angove wines are «good value for money» and he'd prefer to hear that they were simply «good wines».

We have plenty of workman - like, mid-market, value - for - money wines, he would say, but we badly need more great wines.

Alan Frank, you say» The value of the club has nothing to do with how much money you have to spend not in the slightest.»

Alexis came with a good spirit, seing Ozil on board, thinking a team would be built around them but year after year, it is no top class addition with a guessing game plan, weakness all over the pitch, players out of position, a team scared to play and lost as manager... Sanchez then started to ask more money, we said no as to Ozil; waiting 6 month later to be on last year contract... The all management is nuts and Alexis or any players try until they get fed up, Ozil plays to get fit for wrld cup and his value back...

Overall I would say Sanchez was just about good value for the money and wages we paid but OZIL was largely a waste of money, despite his undoubted huge talent, on the low percentage of occasions he could be arsed to show it.

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

I just don't know what their about.Don't we know there's a risk associated with signing any player?To me Lacazette is value for money and I believe we are signing him at almost the right price.All we need is someone who can finish and Lacazette fits the bill.This is the kind of mentality that won't see us winning trophies anytime soon.He was my last option for CF but I won't deny the fact that he's a very good option.People are not able to justify the fact that he's average with facts.Yet the same people say Giroud is world class and so on.Shame on those people.They obviously don't know and understand what football is.

The reason why Chamberlain choosing Liverpool over Chelsea is odd, is because they offered him less money, have NOT offered him a starting CM position, as he said they had, Klopp confirmed that, have not won any trophies for over a decade, unlike Chelsea, or indeed Arsenal, are valued at around 50 % of Arsenal and 60 % of Chelsea.

Ivan has said Wenger is clueless when it comes to player values so even if Wenger wanted to spend some of that money... if Ivan thought the deal was too high priced then it will not happen.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

The nature of math makes mock drafting absurd past maybe the 5th pick.That said, trends have value like a run on QBs which is even money this year.

There is no universal rule that applies to all clubs when it comes to valuing players; rather it is subjective and depends on the context of the club willing to spend money on a said player.

Ian Holloway assured fans at the start of the season that his goal as manager was to deliver value for money and, after a helter - skelter kind of season so far which has contained several stunning highs — beating Liverpool home and away to etch their name into Premier League folklore — we think it's safe to say that the eccentric Bristolian has succeeded.

The G - Luxe is an excellent stroller, but if you got four years out of your Italian job, I'd say that's good value for the money!

I would say the Hotel Grifo is good value for money; especially if the highlight of your trip is to discover the Roman Ruins.

For further information, and to purchase your own copy visit Hue Animation — it is on special offer at # 49.95 at the moment, and I would say that represents good value for money when I consider the hours of use it has already had!

The Crown Agents said that we can apply the $ 40 million on additional expansion work on the Ridge Hospital, and so the scope of the hospital was expanded because of the value for money that was undertaken, and yet you point at the $ 40 million and say it was an inflated contract.