Sentences with phrase «value of the money paid»

It would be essential for you to seek deals that are worth the value of money you pay.

Refunds are not permitted, but will provide guests with a voucher for the value of the monies paid for the booking less the $ 75 cancellation fee providing the change / cancellation is done 14 days or more from the booking date.

A cause of action is available at common law for money paid under a mistake of law, and the court has jurisdiction at common law to award compound interest where the claimant seeks a restitutionary remedy for the time value of money paid under a mistake.

It may award compound damages as a restitutionary remedy for the time value of money paid under a mistake.

Not exact matches

In other words, you can't be an ideal version of yourself if you don't have enough food and money to pay the bills, or enough love and esteem to feel good about your value as a human being.

«With EEDAR estimating current League of Legends revenues to be more than $ 1 billion per year, this means that the value of Riot is significantly higher than $ 1 billion and Tencent would have paid a lot of money for the remaining 7 % of the company's shares,» Walker says.

Only 1 % of those who pay say they think their subscription is too expensive for what they get, and 48 % of digital subscribers say they feel they are getting a «very good value» for the money.

When you sign in to our site or app, you see how much money you put in, how much you've made, what you've paid in fees and the total value of your portfolio.

But anecdotal evidence, at least, suggests that directors often doubt the reliability and value of comp consultants, even after having paid good money for their advice.

If you don't try to negotiate for a higher salary, you could be leaving money on the table — so during your next interview (or annual review), try some of these tricks to increase your perceived value as well as your take - home pay:

Because PE is a measure of earnings over time, you can think of it as representing the number of years required to pay back a stock's purchase price (ignoring inflation, earnings growth and the time value of money).

BH: So, cryptocurrencies are a kind of money, so long as people ascribe value to them and use them to pay for things.

You're paying for the value of that information and those ideas, which is their ability to help you improve your business and make you more money.

That's a good opening for you to ask about fees in general, to ensure that you're paying the least amount of money, for the most value.

Most first - time homebuyers will probably want to make a down payment of at least 20 % of their home's total value, especially if they want to avoid paying extra money for private mortgage insurance (PMI).

Since it reflects the money paid for acquisitions above the market value of the acquired company, it can signal overpayment, reckless spending, and the potential for damaging write - downs in the near future.

They also know the top price (in a competitive situation) that they will pay for an investment in order to realize a return when they sell their holdings, based on the projected amount of money required to build value in the company.

Benson said the amount of money Marin homeowners pay in property tax is less driven by the actual tax rate and more driven by the value of the real estate.

In each of our ETF and mutual fund reports, we also provide the «Accumulated Total Costs vs Benchmark» analysis to show investors, in dollar - value terms, how much money comes out of the their pocket to pay for fund management.

Financially parasitized companies use corporate income to buy back their stock to support its price — and hence, the value of stock options that financial managers give themselves — and borrow yet more money for stock buybacks or simply to pay out as dividends.

«One Pay FX uses blockchain - based technology to provide a fast, simple and secure way to transfer money internationally — offering value, transparency, and the trust and service customers expect from a bank like Santander, said Ana Botín, executive chairman of Banco Santander.

Money as we know it is already somewhat virtual, since the pieces of paper and bits of metal that we use to pay for things don't have any actual value themselves — their only value is that they can be exchanged at stores for things that actually have value, like food.

Property and casualty insurance companies invest a substantial percentage of book value and policyholder «float,» which is money they hold until policy claims are paid out but do not own, in investment - grade bonds, particularly corporate bonds.

If you and I make the exact same amount of money, we live in the exact same value of house, we have the same kind of car, our kids go to the same kind of schools, shouldn't we pay the same federal income tax?

When asked what they find most valuable in financial products, 85 % of respondents said one that «provides a source of tax - free income in retirement,» followed by 78 % who value one that «provides tax - free money for family / loved ones» and 68 % who want a product that «provides the ability to use the funds to pay for college.»

There was no underlying value or profit, just the paying of older investors with money from new investors.

An insidious problem with buildings and church employees (and the need for money to pay for them) that I have seen in every church of which I have been a part is that those who give the most are the most valued.

Campbell is better player than Theo, he run forward and backward to support the midfield, it must be a personal with Wenger.i got the impression Wenger does not like a threat or someone to challenge him at any cost.There are few players that should have been sold and use the money to buy a couple of players.We lost on Kanye, ibramovitch, Bailey, and a few others, simply refuse to pay market value.

Overall I would say Sanchez was just about good value for the money and wages we paid but OZIL was largely a waste of money, despite his undoubted huge talent, on the low percentage of occasions he could be arsed to show it.

Still, the numbers weigh heavily in Chelsea's favour so far, with the Blues getting the best value for money in terms of money paid per goal contribution.

The amount of money you would have to pay them, if you pay them a certain amount they would have to get that much money and even more because of taxable benefit issues just to pay for the value of their scholarship.

If fans will not boycott the games and stop paying for the tickets then let us at least unite and tell Silent Stan that the CEO is not making him the money that he could, if Silent Stan starts to see Gazidis as a loss to profit then maybe we can get an ambitious CEO in who will help us be ambitious and win titles, use that then to get better business done and add to the value of the clubs assets (players), remove the lowest value players (not good enough for AFC) and replace them with high value assets which will increase in value when we are winning / truly competing at the highest level.

Correction The initial fee paid for Di Maria was 25 million Euros, Which at that time when the value of the Euro was half of the pound (I know this because i was in Portugal, when this news broke) equates to around 12.5 Million, Plus a further 11 Million Euros # 6.5 Million If he won a title in his first season which they did, So all in all 19 Million pounds (Wow what a tremendous amount of money to spend, Jesus Andy Caroll cost more than him in the same god damn season)... Falcao's had a release clause of 45 Million, One which they paid money to him and his agent in order to instill in his contract, This is a sour note for most Porto fans because, he jumped ship having signed a 5 year deal In July and he left in August for less money for his buy out clause.

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

Whether priced out of going to watch their beloved Arsenal, fed up with what they feel is spin coming from the club, or disappointed that the huge sums of money they pay in ticket prices are not reinvested into the team, growing numbers of fans are feeling less valued by their club.

Which means a willingness to pay what they're worth & getting rid of Walcott would allow the club to offer as much to an incoming player: any of them above would be willing to talk for that amount of money & feel valued.

«The players who want to stay here play for the club with the way we want to play football, and with the values we think are important for us, and with the right amount of money we want to pay them.

I had followed Arsenal long enough that we have pretty strict wage structure (the belief of football as a team sport and squad harmony is important) and we never pay over the odd for player or greedy agent — which in turn can help us to get the best value for our money All in all, whether it is a smart move, we should patiently wait until end of the transfer window.

My problem now lies with the cost; for years now we have been moaning about the board not allocating money to Wenger, which the last time i wrote on this website dispelled as a lie; he justified spending # 16 Million on Calum Chambers; which with the greatest of respect, I'm yet to see him pay of 50 % of that value.

The funds that those sales could bring in could largely be spent now, so if the estimated income from X player sales should be # 100mil, spend # 75 mil of that now from the cash reserves and then work hard on recouping that money from the average that needs to go... Values was an example and not what I think they are worth XD That area could also deal with contracts, take the pay structure away from the manager and into the club, ensure we do not have this issue again when a new manager feels it is the right direction and has no one to stop him.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Unlike the January of 2013, in which Liverpool managed to secure deals for both Daniel Sturridge and Philippe Coutinho at cut - prices, the club has now realised that these high - value deals are a rarity, and the likelihood of them is rather slim, but also that there is a need and requirement to pay the money when the time is right — it seems Jürgen Klopp has helped bring about that realisation.

«I'm getting paid today by the people of this state; they give me a check and they expect me to work for them for that check they expect value for their money,» Cuomo told the Post's Fred Dicker during an interview on Talk 1300 WGDJ - AM.

Additionally, taxes like the inheritance tax (taxing money you pass to your descendants) and property taxes (directly taxing your held property yearly) operate on a similar formula, meaning that the more wealthy people pay more both as a matter of percentage and absolute value.

In practice it is slightly more complex than this as inflation can reduce the effective size of a debt and you can borrow money to pay off debts to get better interest rates, and for a whole country the value of the currency has a significant effect,

The CEO of the Commission, Dr. Edward Kwapong, said the decision should give value for money and link productivity with pay.

All it (NNPC) does is allow a group of people, who themselves don't have any kind of operating background to pay $ 50m for access to the crude oil in blocs valued at over $ 2bn and they just take the crude oil, ship it out and don't return the money and there is no trace of where the money has gone.

They do not pay fees because their government, in spite of having much less money to play with than ours, values education.

Unfortunately, we owe them so much money we have a competing need to inflate the value of the American dollar so we can afford to pay them back.

Separate from congestion pricing has been a proposal for «value capture» funding that would provide money for specific transit upgrades based on the proximity of property and the taxes paid on that property.