Sentences with phrase «value of things sold»

Not exact matches

And he knew that he was paid based on one thing and one thing only: the value of annuities he sold.

A clear summary of your points is possibly the best thing you can do to not just deliver value to the reader, but also make the book memorable, which helps you sell more books.

It's natural to think about innovation through the lens of the things you hope it will produce — products and services imbued with value that sell.

For one thing, frequent transactions mean market swings could have a bigger impact on you — if you're forced to sell shares whenever you need cash, even if the value of your investments has dropped.

So, if you're interested in collecting things and continuing to keep your home lovely at the same time, try turning the collections into passive income by selling some of the things you find (especially the ones that are being sold under their value, and you would know, because you are paying attention).

For example, I can remember selling real estate when interest rates were 22 % but the interesting thing is that for those individuals who were brave enough to purchase back then, they did very well on the sale value of the property down the road.

Even in capitalist societies — which are supposed to know the price of everything and the value of nothing — it turns out that the most important things in life are still understood as goods that can not be bought and sold without reducing their value to zero.

Retailers were given incentives and things of value to sell additional products.

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

The reason why nobody takes us ARSENAL fans seriously is because there are a few here that had the balls of calling on Sanchez to be sold, underperformer, rubbish, when reality is him and Ozil are the only reasons why we are still relevant, then of course when we call on the real underperformer Le Fraud they call us cry babies, ungrateful and all kind of nonsense...... Two (2) things were left clear from today's game OG is no striker and Campbell should ask his agent to start looking for another team where he will be valued for his worth

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

maybe you don't understand that Wenger's words are simply an attempt to recover some of the market value that was lost due to the way they have mishandled his contract negotiations, which means that everyone, once again, knows that we have little to no leverage when it comes to negotiating a transfer... much like we did with RVP, when we sold the EPL trophy to ManU for less than $ 25 million... any reputable team with a sporting director would never have allowed this situation to occur again and if they had heads would roll... if handled correctly the worst case scenario would have seen us get a minimum of $ 65 million for a player of his ilk in the present economic climate and we could have used those funds to purchase the best available striker in the early days of the transfer window... just imagine what outsiders must think about the state of our team if all you did was read the headlines... sadly, things might just might be worse than they think

IMO the boss has done things the right way, should we now get someone in, the sell on value of Walcot will be so much higher with 4 or 5 years of his new contract to run.

However do agree with Stan on one thing, there are better ways to earn Mooney then football, Stan can now sell his shares and walk away with 1.5 billion or more GBP he can generate 10 % return on that money which is around 150 million GBP while his not earning anything now only the Value of the club is going up and i fear that what with the new prices and salaries of football players i can see a decline starting in a few years, so is he good for us in the future?

Things go bad to worse when her legal aid informs her house was sold legally at a tax auction for a fraction of its value to someone else.

Hurry Sundown (1967), based on a best - selling novel, stars Michael Caine and Jane Fonda as the children of privileged Southern aristocracy trying to parlay the only thing of value they have left — the family land of a former plantation — into a new fortune.

With things looking bleak, with the business» stock price falling to pennies on the dollar, this wild man who once had a nose for gold sells everything he has of value and heads to Indonesia on a hunch.

While things have improved in Utah, the report indicates as much as a third of Utah's private lands are former school trust lands that were sold in years past, often at less than their real value.

The Porsche Panamera is one of the most expensive vehicles on our list of luxury cars with the best resale value, so it's a good thing that owners will get a lot of it back when they sell.

All these things add value to the work that you're selling and should be reflected in the price of your work.

And that's a good thing, because if everyone else knew what you knew and could do what you can do, you wouldn't have anything of value to offer or sell.

If the property is priced high, the best thing to do is to sell off the property because you can never predict when the market value of the property will decrease.

Also, if you own property or other things of value, you may consider selling them in order to pay off a huge chunk of debt at one time.

I think there's a lot of value in tapping a new market, but if you're selling $ 200 products in lieu of $ 500 products just to defend your position against a competitor, things might not be as rosy as they seem to be.

The My Home Section takes a look at several different things surrounding homes and mortgages including looking at your mortgage and whether you can save, a section looking at your home's value (if you have one), looking at details of homes sold in your area (in case you're thinking about selling), and a section looking at the home buying process for new buyers.

So I though «Hmm... if the South Street Seaport is on the books at less than 10 % of market value, then maybe there's some other hidden real estate value on the books and this thing could be selling at a fraction of private market value.»

So if I'm buying and selling that exchange traded fund and I want to put options or whatever on this thing, I have that option because it trades like a stock, versus a mutual fund, where it's going to close at net asset value at the end of the day.

Since Emeco is at this point in time mostly a bet on liquidation value one of the most important things to track is how much money the company is receiving for the idle equipment that they are selling, and for the first time since 2009 they sold a bunch of equipment for a significant loss:

At the end of 1999, the company owned call options on 118 million shares and had sold put options on 69 million shares, and amount that equaled billions of dollars of notional value of Dell common stock — real cash that Dell would have to come up with if things went bad.

Between the buying and selling closing costs, you're going to lose close to 10 % of the value of the home, then there's the cost of all the little things you're going to end up fixing along the way.

Also, check the company's income statement for things that are not sustainable like selling assets and big write - downs to the value of assets.

Buffett after he was done with the net net thing and by the mid 1960's and with Mungers influence would buy a basket of average business that he could make good earnings yield on and looked like pretty good business and bought them during a correction of an industry or general stock market correction then sell them once they became higher valued..

Now to toot my own horn, that's exactly why I wrote The Value of Simple the way I did, because so many other guides take for granted that you already buy and sell stocks or mutual funds and they just have to convince you to shift your focus to a slightly different set of things you already know how to buy.

A product that can do two things instead of one has value for the customer, but how much value is there for the retailer, which may be better off selling two items instead of one?

One thing they touched on in an investor presentation is the value of being able to cross sell products like this to existing cardholders.

if you sell one or two pieces to a person that is one thing — but to become of interest to a serious collector who is interested in investing large sums of money in a piece or a group of pieces to add to his collection — there must be some consistent history where the body of work that the artist has created along with the existence of a sufficient aftermarket for the work — has been built up — will make anything that you are selling eventually obtain great value --

To me, it would have meant that — this is pre this new rage in buying and selling paintings — that, I think, that the formal values, like light, space, color, all those things that a painting is made up of, as well as the Jacob going up the ladder or Venus on the half shell or something (chuckles) would be what interested the painter.

«We negotiate the price with the consignors based on the transaction value of similar things that were sold,» explained Luxembourg.

True human values are in this media - centric universe a bi-product of selling things.

25,000 GBP is a lot for a «yard sale», and things like selling your car are well documented (with a signed contract, the name of the buyer, the age and model of car give a good appraisal of its value...)

As a vital tool to tackle fraud and losses from malpractice, among other things, securities law ensures that investors have an informed and precise idea of the interest they are purchasing or selling and its value, and governs the procedures involved in the exchange of such assets.

The last thing you need is a car that loses its value too quickly or is worth a fraction of its original price when it comes time to sell.

Bitcoins have value for the same reason the US dollar does — it's a useful form of money that's used by people to buy and sell things.

Of course, the product and / or service you're selling is you... The things you will do for your target employers... Your potential value to them.

The things that differentiate your unique promise of value from your job seeking competitors is what will sell you.

Keep in mind though, that a resume you will submit should have your own message of the main selling points that you have, things that set you apart from the crowd of other candidates, and value you can bring to the employer.

You don't need to understand every detail about every aspect of what the company makes, but definitely have a basic understanding of the primary things your company produces, sells, or values.

In addition to your education, if you have received certifications or gained special recognition for your achievements, include this information at the bottom of your résumé When selling yourself to a potential employer, the most important thing is to show them your value.

But there are other deciding factors: Insurers look at the value of properties you sell, your transaction volume, gross revenue, and risk management practices, among other things.

But if they want to sell it, they must come to terms with the fact that at end of the day, that heart and that soul are not counted along with real things like location and mechanics when it comes to the value of their home.