«When an employee walks into a space, they can tell a difference in places that
value people rather than finishes,» Pease says.
Not exact matches
It works the other way, too — producers
value the things they create by what other
people are willing to pay,
rather than the (often smaller) amount that it cost them to produce.
Goldfein said part of the reason for that continued slide was that money was not the main focus for many pilots but
rather the «
value proposition» of working with highly skilled
people on meaningful missions.
Rather, he thinks product - makers should measure
value in «net positive contributions to
people's lives.»
Although all businesses should focus on LTV for each customer, for B2B companies, that
value is most often tied to an entire account,
rather than a
person.
All traditional forms of
person - to -
person exchange include the physical exchange of cash or checks
rather than a real - time digital exchange of
value.
Learn to
value the
people and relationships that consistently bring you contentment,
rather than having your perception dictated by the fleeting victories and losses we all experience.
These are not
values that change from time to time, situation to situation or
person to
person, but
rather they are the underpinning of our company culture.
Rather than create a true ranking and assign each company a numerical
value, we compared 16 top companies that were available to most
people based on a set of criteria, and then identified those that are the best for specific types of borrowers.
«This could bring to light voices who aren't normally heard within a company, including
people who aren't invited to meetings because they aren't seen as «expert» enough - resulting in more accurate calculations of
value which could lead to promoting the best
people,
rather than the perceived best
people or
people with the loudest voices.
Except when looking at the case of BitConnect it was not a question of transferring dollars into «Crystals», but
rather a promising cryptocurrency that
people were supposed to use to generate
value and revenue for themselves.
Rather, dollars are a temporary store of
value, a means of transmitting that
value from one
person to another.
When we see stock prices as «what other
people believe the company is worth»
rather than the real
value (at least in the short term), these fluctuations become our allies in our noble quest for creating wealth.
At least half the mortgage defaults are not by
people who truly can't pay their mortgages,
rather they are by «strategic defaulters» who don't WANT to pay their mortgages because the
value of what they borrowed against their home, went down.
I
value the freedom to examine the evidence and come to my own conclusions,
rather then having conclusions force - fed to me like so many religious
people have had done to them.
in the day, s that jesus our lord was on the earth (jesus) there was many
people named jesus, just as among hispanic and central american
peoples, it was a common popular name of many
people, if you want to prove to your self that jesus was not married, look up what the apostle said,» i saw standing upon mount zion with the lamb 144,000, these are they that have washed thier robes and were not defilled with women, for they are virgins, jesus emphasised in parts the need and
values of a husband and wife in a home, the two mary, s and the women that followed him and ministered unto him tells us the great importance of women, and women in the home, he wanted all married men to have thier own wife, in those days of so many years ago there was false prophets, storytellers, wild imaginations, he told us not to believe them, whether you are catholic, christian, islamic or any other, we can all take pride in the fact what the prohets, jesus and the apostles told us all fits jointly to gether, they were a work of love, to understand the christian bible correctly, islamic
people are not rejected, but
rather they are a equal, the angel told hagar to return to her mistress, he also told her he would make ishmael a blessing and his seed a great nation, regards
This seems a
rather unnecessary progression of logic if indeed other
people are just random collections of atoms themselves with no purpose or inherent
value.
Rather, «Are the
people, the organisations, the promises, the
values and the relationships you put your faith in day by day, year by year, really worth your investment of trust?»
One of the things I highly
value, and I wish the church would, is mutual passion for truth and the well - being of all
people,
rather than its own security or agenda.
Pope Benedict again reminds us: Many
people today have a limited idea of the Christian faith because they identify it with a mere system of beliefs and
values rather than with the truth of a God who revealed Himself in history, anxious to communicate with human beings in a tête - a-tête, in a relationship of love with them.
Rather the media, as it were, form the «web» of the culture, the matrix where most
people now get most of their insight, influence,
values and meaning.
Similarly, while there may be some
value in the refusal to take a moral stance on homosexuality — in order to focus squarely on the nature of marriage
rather than on same - sex relationships — I am less than persuaded by the authors» moral judgment that
people's sexual relationships are a private issue.
To continue a bit with the end of that last idea: so if a group of
people are on the scene of some event covered by the news, then obviously there would be great
value in knowing some directly transferred assessment
values from their brains,
rather than what today we get as a summary from a few reporters plus maybe a few witnesses that still have to express what they saw.
The age old problem of SELF often is manifest in a false identity such as; «we are children of Abraham» (therefore I am righteous), «I go to... «church»» (somehow this «church» makes you something) or «all you say we will do» (the
people of Israel saying they in themself can meet God's standard), «I give to the church» (not personally meeting others needs), «I do this program or that program» (though you do not desire to glorify God but
rather there is some intrinsic
value in doing a program).
Television,
rather than the churches, is becoming the place where
people find a worldview which reflects what to them is of ultimate
value, and which justifies their behavior and way of life.
Rather these traditional ethical
values must be understood as the symbolic expression of what takes place when
people stand in true dialogical relation to each other.
It may be that kerygmatic allusions to Jesus» humility, meekness, gentleness, love, forgiveness and obedience derive from historical memory of Jesus; but the «historical
value» which such material may have is far from its kerygmatic meaning, which is more accurately stated by Bultmann, in language actually intended to state the significance of the pre-existence in the karygma: «That Jesus, the historical
person, did this service for us, and that he did it not out of personal sympathy and loveableness, but
rather by God acting in him, in that God established his love for us through Jesus dying for us sinners (Rom.
Those who use language to express themselves —
rather than to communicate something of
value to others — are not concerned with either the situation in which they speak or the
persons to whom they speak.
Genesis also affirms the fundamental
value of each human life, our essential equality as human beings, and our interrelatedness with nature,
rather than television «s view that young, white, unmarried males are somehow given a position of power considerably «above» females, older
people, and minorities.
Suburbia may also have fostered the absorption of the monetary
value - standard; the question most frequently asked by thousands of wide - eyed schoolchildren visiting the traveling King Tut exhibit was not anything about that fabulous era, or what those
people believed as they prepared for afterlife, but
rather, «How much does it cost?»
The fact that the Bible lends itself to competing interpretations should be cause for celebration
rather than dismay, for these competing interpretations among
people of faith who love and
value Scripture help bring us into relationship with one another and with God.
Religion should be accepted on its own intrinsic
values, based on altruism, which means
people come to it,
rather than it having to force itself on
people (via brainwashing).
If God really raised a
person up to be a CEO of a company, it would be for the purpose of showing the world how a business can successfully be run according to the principles and
values of the Kingdom of God
rather than the principles of the rulers of this world.
Some
people do (A little unsettling that our Government f eels that way imo), but to be frank i think it is
rather absurd for anyone to expect a country ON THE OTHER HALF OF THE WORLD that is THOUSANDS of years older than we to have the EXACT SAME
values as we do.
It's a
value system based on community
rather than the individual, and holds that the honor of the community is more important than the life, health, or well - being of any one
person or family in the community.
The truth in which it was interested was primarily the personal knowledge of God,
persons,
values and meanings,
rather than the objective knowledge of the scientist.
Yet we in the West should strive for humane borders in which travelers and immigrants of all backgrounds are treated with respect by state authorities, and
valued as human beings with great potential,
rather than dismissed as faceless hordes — or, in Hitchens's words, «countless
persons from who - knows - where.»
Rather, this is to uphold the importance of religion in
people's worldview, especially in our historical times when many of the age - old
values are crumbling.
Television,
rather than the churches, is becoming the place where
people find a worldview which reflects what to them is of ultimate
value, and which justifies their behavior and way of life.6]
I believe that when
people espouse the
values of a mother or wife exclusively being a homemaker, they are longing for a perceived simpler and easier time as opposed to truth, elevating a nostalgic look at motherhood from the standpoint of the post-war American dream of the white, upper - middle - class
rather than Scripture.
In terms of the political system, the media, again reflecting the
values held by society generally, give us politics by image, treating politicians and their campaigns as products to be sold
rather than as
people and ideas to be understood.
«Pro-life
people,» she wrote, «believe that one becomes a parent by being a parent; parenthood is for them a «natural»
rather than a social role The
values implied by the in - vogue term «parenting» (as in parenting classes) are alien to them.»
To be the only chaplain in a 170 - bed hospital filled with a great number of
people who are quadraplegic; to try to help these
people rediscover and / or redefine a life
value and quality that they often feel has been lost; to grow to care greatly about these
people; to do all these things and yet deep, deep inside, to feel that you would
rather be dead than be quadraplegic — that's hard to admit.
(So that when you read a news story, for instance, you might also get a composite assessment
value that was assigned directly from other readers without them ever having to express such assessment via speaking, writing, etc. if a group of
people are on the scene of some event covered by the news, then obviously there would be great
value in knowing some directly transferred assessment
values from their brains,
rather than what today we get as a summary from a few reporters plus maybe a few witnesses that still have to express what they saw.)
To honor this day, I hope
people will reflect how they live their lives and how they treat others, on promoting and adhering to good
values that honor our fellow countrymen
rather than adversely focusing on what separates us.
One should also appreciate the fact that though an institution founded by Christian Missions, considering the inter-religious character of the academic community of the college, the founders emphasized the Christian «
values» of self - giving service to the poor and concern for the whole
person rather than Christian salvation, thereby somewhat separating the common «culture» and
values of humanism of academic community of the college, from the Christian «religion» and thus relatively secularizing it to keep the academic community free from discrimination on the basis of religion.
Trained to speak about culture and morality in «neutral» ways («
value systems» and that sort of thing),
people like me can offer ourselves as «global leaders»
rather than parochial Americans.
Rather,
value in institutions is systemic, assuming a variety of forms, and it is this coherent and focused system of
values which socializes every living
person in any institution, overtly and covertly.
Within the more traditional framework, fundamentalism has been described as a «world - view,» a
rather tight (or narrow, or simplistic) view of the world — an orientation that is perhaps hierarchically organized around the ultimate
value of otherworldly salvation, an orientation that supplies totally encompassing normative expectations for how
people should behave, a set of beliefs and assumptions that are deeply meaningful to the
people who hold them and that give meaning to these
people's lives.
What irked Macintosh was that Wieman talked about God as «the growth of meaning and
value in the world» and saw no evidence pointing to God as a
person; Wieman thought that Macintosh, though starting with empirical evidence, proceeded to interpret God in terms of human wishes
rather than in terms of the facts.