- QB - MLB - OL (LG, RT, C — this will give us flexibility to put Groy wherever he excels)- WR - Young RB (I'm weird, I really want that Shady replacement and we can get a great
value pick guy here)
Not exact matches
I'm torn on this — the 2nd overall
pick gives you a chance to draft a legitimate difference maker, but unfortunately the top of the draft seems to be 4 QBs who seem to have as much upside as they do question marks and
guys whose true talents don't necessarily warrant the
value of a # 2.
Also, compensatory
picks are
valued at the contract a
guy comes from and signs too.
I would understand small moves up or down if they feel «their
guy» is about to get snatched up, or nothing they like is of
value, but (historically) I'm getting tired of looking back to past drafts and saying,» «Player A» was right there when we
picked «player B.» What if we had got him instead?»
Reggie needs to hit on some
value free agency signings and impact draft
picks, and Gruden's coaching staff needs to put
guys in a position to succeed or it will be more of the same, regardless of what Mack makes.
He's likely at the latest a 2nd round
pick, and there's plenty of
guys that fill bigger needs in the same
value range.
They should just draft the best player on their board at those points — if a 3rd round
value shows up in the 6th round, who cares about whether they already
picked a
guy at the same position.
I don't think it's worth giving up early round
picks to move up a few spots unless your damn sure the
guy is going to be stud just don't see the
value.
So this
pick is not entered with the expectation that he
values Watt just because he's a local
guy.
Those
guys we lesser injury risks than Ross and would have been great
value picks.
From that POV, it probably wouldn't matter whether it was Thomas Dimitroff (the
guy whose neglect of the defense led the team to have to do a complete rebuild in the first place) or some other
guy with weakened GM powers, if you devote almost every high
value pick for six years to one side of the ball, that side of the ball will probably get better.
Lower round /
value guys I like: Jeff Holland, Uchenna Nwosu, Josh Sweat (but don't see him as a top 50
pick talent like some do), Leon Jacobs, Hercules Mata'afa, Ade Aruna (relative to his nfl.com grade, I like him a lot), Ola Adeniyi (as a shoot - for - the - moon late round
pick).
If you get the
guy you want and he is going to be
picked before you
pick again, good
value.
If you are a
value guy like me, you
pick from the bottom quartile, the green zone, for out - of - favor industries.
In its genuine collapsing of the art - life divide and its affirmation of the
value of bringing art into unlikely places, the piece reminds me of what I've admired about The Art
Guys since, as an art student in Boston in the mid-1990s, I
picked up their Contemporary Arts Museum Houston catalog and thought, «There are artists in Houston?»
(Update: Whether or not that's true, it seems clear those who set this up didn't understand what they were doing any more than I understand this... as a non-stats
guy, I would
pick a
value that accomplishes what I'm looking for and avoids eliminating more «votes» than needed.)
Lets us know that the +
value is unicode 43 (look down to the long table of «encodings» and
pick out the one named «HTML»... there is also a «HTML entry (hex)» you could use of x2b if you are a hex kind of
guy; --RRB-
However, it is actually helpful to hear multiple panels from a mock jury separately reason through a case and
pick the same good
guys and bad
guys and apply the same set of
values to decide the outcome.