Sentences with phrase «value than the purchase price»

If you are expecting a much higher value than your purchase price, then you may as well wait the 6 months and then refinance 75 % of appraised value.

Not exact matches

«You are going to receive more value out of the purchase rather than pushing your cart through the store and wondering if you got a good price.»

This purchase part of the contract will specify either an agreed - upon purchase price — which can be higher than the current market value, depending on the length of the rental agreement — or include details of when and how the price will set in the future.

«With better price comparison, you are going to receive more value out of the purchase rather than pushing your cart through the store and wondering if you got a good price,» Shelton said.

Investors love warrants because they offer an extra chance to share in a company's upside potential — in cases in which the warrant is exercisable at a preset purchase price that turns out to be less than the stock's market value.

More than half were purchased at prices well above the assessed market value.

The purchase price of each Share will be (i) not less than the net asset value per Share (the «NAV Per Share») of the Company's common stock (as determined in good faith by the board of directors of the Company or a committee thereof, in its sole discretion) immediately prior to the Expiration Date (as defined in the Offer to Purchase)(the date of repurchase) and (ii) not more than 2.5 % greater than the NAV Per Share as of such date, plus any unpaid dividends accrued through the expiration date of the Tendepurchase price of each Share will be (i) not less than the net asset value per Share (the «NAV Per Share») of the Company's common stock (as determined in good faith by the board of directors of the Company or a committee thereof, in its sole discretion) immediately prior to the Expiration Date (as defined in the Offer to Purchase)(the date of repurchase) and (ii) not more than 2.5 % greater than the NAV Per Share as of such date, plus any unpaid dividends accrued through the expiration date of the TendePurchase)(the date of repurchase) and (ii) not more than 2.5 % greater than the NAV Per Share as of such date, plus any unpaid dividends accrued through the expiration date of the Tender Offer.

The plan administrator determines the purchase price or strike price for a stock appreciation right, which generally can not be less than 100 % of the fair market value of our Class A common stock on the date of grant.

Nonstatutory Stock Options, or NSOs, will provide for the right to purchase shares of our common stock at a specified price, which may not be less than fair market value on the date of grant, and usually will become exercisable (at the discretion of the administrator) in one or more installments after the grant date, subject to the participant's continued employment or service with us and / or subject to the satisfaction of corporate performance targets and individual performance targets established by the administrator.

You can do a cash - out refinance if you've occupied your home for less than that, but you will be limited to the lesser of the original purchase price or current appraised value.

The lender's maximum loan amount is based on appraised value if it is lower than the purchase price.

However, because assessed values rise to the purchase price when a home is sold, new homeowners can expect to pay higher rates than that.

A: Amazon (AMZN) is a company we have long admired, but only recently were we afforded an opportunity to purchase it at a lower price - to - sales ratio than the average bricks and mortar store (defining sales as gross market value of all items sold on its website).

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

If you account for the fact that the Wii U is more expensive to produce than a Wii and you factor in inflation... and you factor in the ACTUAL VALUE of your purchase, the price is extremely fair.

Situations that would normally lead to a lease being classified as a finance lease include the following: the lease transfers ownership of the asset to the lessee by the end of the lease term; the lessee has the option to purchase the asset at a price which is expected to be sufficiently lower than fair value at the date the option becomes exercisable and that, at the inception of the lease, it is reasonably certain that the option will be exercised; the lease term is for the major part of the economic life of the asset, even if title is not transferred; at the inception of the lease, the present value of the minimum lease payments amounts to at least substantially all of the fair value of the leased asset, and; the lease assets are of a specialised nature such that only the lessee can use them without major modifications being made.

My purchase price (less than book) for a car that originally had a msrp north of 50,000 is an exceptional value.

Purchase price was more than fair, trade in value also honestly given, Vehicle was exactly as

The sum of your Down Payment and Net Trade - in Value is greater than the Purchase Price of this vehicle.

If finding a car with the highest fuel efficiency, best resale value and strongest customer satisfaction survey responses are more important than a low sticker price, purchasing a Nissan Versa, Toyota Yaris or Honda Fit may be a better choice.

Also, while it's true that the Audi S1 will retain a healthy proportion of its purchase price when it comes to time to sell, fast Fords are always in demand, and the residual values of the Focus ST are far more impressive than more humdrum Focus models.

If finding a car with the highest fuel efficiency, best resale value and strongest customer satisfaction survey responses are more important than a low sticker price, purchasing a Nissan, Scion or Honda may be a better choice.

If that isn't enough, hybrid publishers set the price for the book (often higher than market value) and charge you a premium for the books you purchase.

This incentive — offered with two options authors can pick from — will be, in many cases, of a monetary value greater than the entire price of the package purchased, so this will only be offered to the first ten authors that say «yes».

If my property's appraised value is more than the purchase price, may I use the difference toward my down payment?

• The home's purchase price must be no more than the appraised value of the property.

b) If the property was purchased less than one year preceding the application date, the LTV / CLTV (85 %) for the mortgage amount must be calculated using the lesser of the appraised value or the original sales price of the property.

If your loan request is for more than 80 percent of the purchase price, it will need to be verified you have at least 5 percent of the property's value in your own assets.

Similarly, a capital loss occurs when an asset decreases in value, making it worth less than its original purchase price.

Capital gain is an increase in the value of a capital asset (investment or real estate) that gives it a higher worth than the purchase price.

When the economy is expanding, earnings tend to grow across the market and in such an environment, investors historically could purchase value cyclical stocks at a much more attractive price than evergreen growth stocks.

With over 10 years of experience in the fields of research, marketing, sales and distribution, Opperman saw in his situation, an opportunity to create a platform where sellers receive more money than ever thought possible, while at the same time the buyers are able to purchase diamonds and jewelry at below retail prices; for the first time ever, a unique model that adds value to both sides of the equation.

Appraisal of property being substantially lower than purchase price, the loan - to - value ratio (LTV) may be more than the lender can legally approve.

Here's the formula: Loan amount ÷ appraisal value or purchase price (whichever is less) For example: The home you want to buy has an appraised value of $ 205,000, but $ 200,000 is the purchase price The bank will base the loan amount on the $ 200,000 figure, because it's the lower of the 2 You have $ 40,000 for a down payment, so you need a $ 160,000 loan to meet the $ 200,000 purchase price Your loan - to - value equation would look like this: $ 160,000 ÷ $ 200,000 =.80 You multiply.80 by 100 % and that gives you an LTV of 80 % Private mortgage insurance (PMI) If your down payment is lower than 20 %, your loan - to - value ratio for conventional financing will be higher than 80 %.

A conventional mortgage is one in which the down payment amount is equal to more than 20 % of the purchase price (or where the loan value is less than 80 %).

Because the amount of market discount, two points, is less than the de minimis amount (which in this case is 2.5 points, or 0.25 percent of the face value of a bond times the number of years between the bond's acquisition and its maturity), the market discount is considered to be zero and the difference between purchase price and sales price or redemption is generally treated as a capital gain upon disposition or redemption.

The effect of this rule is that a taxpayer who purchases a tax - exempt bond subsequent to its original issuance at a price less than its stated redemption price at maturity (or, if issued with OID, at a price less than its accreted value), either because interest rates have risen or the obligor's credit has declined since the bond was issued, and who thereafter recognizes gain on the disposition of such bond will have part or all of the «gain» treated as ordinary income.

I have a friend who I am purchasing an investment property from at the same price they paid for it but the appraisal value is about a 1/3 higher than what I will pay for it.

I believe for an FHA loan I need a new appraisal + need equity = 20 % of appraised value rather than purchase price.

There are many other perils covered by the policy as well, and you get replacement cost coverage that allows you to purchase a replacement item at retail rather than having to make up the often significant difference between retail price and the actual cash value that some policies provide.

Buyers with a loan - to - value ratio greater than 90 percent can ask a seller to contribute 3 percent of the purchase price.

If the property value in your neighborhood declines, you can also lose your equity value as the home is now worth less than your original purchase price.

Rather than being paid out to the bondholder, it is factored into the difference between the purchase price and the face value at maturity.

In cases where there are multiple purchases, I will simply use the average purchase price to approximate an overall initial yield rather than showing multiple values which will only obfuscate what the chart is intending to show.

That way, when your beneficiary sells your home, they are taxed based on how much it has appreciated from the value at the date of death, rather than your original purchase price.

VA does not require a down payment if the purchase price or cost is not more than the reasonable value of the property as determined by VA, but the lender may require one.

If the appraised value comes in lower than the contracted purchase price, the buyer will need to bring the difference to closing, which would increase the total cash - to - close and defeat the purpose of including a seller contribution to closing costs to begin with.

Whether an in the money strike price is higher or lower than the current stock value depends on the type of option contract purchased.

If the purchase price or cost is more than the reasonable value, the difference must be paid in cash from your own resources.

A conventional mortgage is usually one where the down payment is equal to 25 % or more of the purchase price, a loan to value of or less than 75 %, and does not normally require mortgage loan insurance.