Sentences with phrase «value vs»

If on the other hand, you are going with conventional loan (after quit claim deeding the LLC off title and adding your name for 6 months) then we can cash out 75 % of the appraised value vs having to wait 12 months to cash out 75 % of the appraised value with a portfolio lender that closes in LLC.

Being new to this, I found out many lenders of conventional mortgages require replacement value vs cash value.

This is a very very big deal, because it allows you to get a much higher after rehab appraisal value vs purchase price, than if you bought a house in the best neighborhood.

A comment on the person who asked about analyzing his property for returns based upon its current value vs what he / she has invested into it.

«For those people that want to buy and hold BTC for the long term, this attractively high investment yield can provide a sort of «buffer» against unfavorable decrease in BTC value vs other currencies or assets and perhaps make the spot currency market volatility a little less painful for those that are holding bitcoin for the future.»

Personally, I feel given the value vs cost vs feature set of both cameras it makes complete sense that the pricier option (the Nest) was not the choice especially since most of those nice features come at a premium.

And 1.64 x TVPI (total value vs paid in (capital).

In fact, your life insurance agent can design a whole life policy for you that generates high cash value vs a large death benefit.

In the interest of full disclosure, my «sense» is that such a small temperature increase would not increase water vapor significantly enough to cause a statistically significant increase in numbers and / or severity of extreme events, especially since most of the warming has reportedly been in the high northern latitudes where temperatures are well below 0C where the water vapor saturation value vs temperature curve is pretty flat.

And as the city grows that location's relative value vs the city's max UHI will also change.

Boundary - value vs initial - value problems.

Overall, we've seen that when deciding between the Expedia ® + Card from Citi and most other cards, the decision comes down to value vs simplicity.

Picking it up without a Pogi bag... they are scented which helps a lot... and the value vs quantity is awesome!!!

-LSB-...] and Stock Market Seasonality (1987), Josef Lakonishok, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation and Risk (1994) and The Brandes Institute's Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon (2008) all -LSB-...]

This was one of the questions I had after reading The Brandes Institute's Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon update of the Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation and Risk.

-LSB-...] and Stock Market Seasonality (1987), Josef Lakonishok, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny's Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation and Risk (1994) as updated by The Brandes Institute's Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon (2008)-LSB-...]

Anginer and Statman's findings would seem to accord with the findings of Josef Lakonishok, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny in Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation and Risk (and the The Brandes Institute update Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon.

-LSB-...] and Stock Market Seasonality (1987), Josef Lakonishok, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny's Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation and Risk (1994) as updated by The Brandes Institute's Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon (2008) speak -LSB-...]

Josef Lakonishok, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny's Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation and Risk, which was updated by The Brandes Institute as Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon reopened -LSB-...]

-LSB-...] studies that I'm so fond of quoting (for example, Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon and Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation and Risk) confirm for me that value is a real phenomenon.

In 1992, the Fama - French three factor model (market risk, size and value) found that both the size (small vs large cap) and book - to - market equity (value vs growth) factors deliver a higher risk - adjusted return in NYSE stocks, and thus the model adjusts for the outperformance of size and value when valuing a stock.

-LSB-...] Investment, Extrapolation and Risk, which was updated by The Brandes Institute as Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon reopened the debate, suggesting that price - to - earnings and price - to - cash flow might add something -LSB-...]

The various academic studies that I'm so fond of quoting (for example, Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon and Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation and Risk) confirm for me that value is a real -LSB-...]

-LSB-...] Investment, Extrapolation and Risk (1994) as updated by The Brandes Institute's Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon (2008) speak to the return on the Ultra-low Price - to - book Portfolio.

-LSB-...] Vishny in Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation and Risk (and the The Brandes Institute update Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon.

-LSB-...] Investment, Extrapolation and Risk (1994) as updated by The Brandes Institute's Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon (2008)-- but it is most closely associated with Fama and -LSB-...]

-LSB-...] Robert Vishny Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation and Risk (1994) and The Brandes Institute's Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon (2008)-- low price - to - book value stocks outperform higher priced stocks and the market in general.

In Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon, The Brandes Institute updated the landmark 1994 study by Josef Lakonishok, Andrei Shleifer, and -LSB-...]

Again, it might work better for timing Russell Value vs Growth, but that isn't how I invest.

Josef Lakonishok, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny's Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation and Risk, which was updated by The Brandes Institute as Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon reopened the debate, suggesting that price - to - earnings and price - to - cash flow might add something to price - to - book.

In a new paper Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon (via SSRN) The Brandes Institute updates the landmark 1994 study by Josef Lakonishok, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny investigating the performance of value stocks relative to that of glamour securities in the United States over a 26 - year period.

In Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon, The Brandes Institute updated the landmark 1994 study by Josef Lakonishok, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation and Risk.

I will make an assertion here that many will find controversial as we are constantly fed the diet of Value vs Growth.

In this instance, Professor Oppenheimer's study speaks to the return on the Near Graham Net Net Portfolio, as Roger Ibbotson's Decile Portfolios of the New York Stock Exchange, 1967 — 1984 (1986), Werner F.M. DeBondt and Richard H. Thaler's Further Evidence on Investor Overreaction and Stock Market Seasonality (1987), Josef Lakonishok, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny's Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation and Risk (1994) as updated by The Brandes Institute's Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon (2008) speak to the return on the Ultra-low Price - to - book Portfolio.

As the various studies we have discussed recently demonstrate — Roger Ibbotson's Decile Portfolios of the New York Stock Exchange, 1967 — 1984 (1986), Werner F.M. DeBondt and Richard H. Thaler's Further Evidence on Investor Overreaction and Stock Market Seasonality (1987), Josef Lakonishok, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation and Risk (1994) and The Brandes Institute's Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon (2008)-- low price - to - book value stocks outperform higher priced stocks and the market in general.

As we discussed yesterday in Testing the performance of price - to - book value, various studies, including Roger Ibbotson's Decile Portfolios of the New York Stock Exchange, 1967 — 1984 (1986), Werner F.M. DeBondt and Richard H. Thaler's Further Evidence on Investor Overreaction and Stock Market Seasonality (1987), Josef Lakonishok, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation and Risk (1994) and The Brandes Institute's Value vs Glamour: A Global Phenomenon (2008) all conclude that lower price - to - book value stocks tend to outperform higher price - to - book value stocks, and at lower risk.

At some point the value vs costs just doesn't make sense anymore.

so can I get a dolar value vs all other currencies?

But I think of this topic the same way as I think of value vs growth investing.

It is hard to discribe but the Terrain feel more truck like and Higher value vs the Chevy that is more car like feeling and value market like.

Great car and value vs competition.

The ANDI (Aggregate Nutrient Density Index; see https://www.drfuhrman.com/library/andi-food-scores.aspx) scoring system is an attempt to qualify different foods by comparing their nutritive value vs calorie density.

I obviously didn't know if we would have grabbed a DE earlier, so I was looking forward to a conversation on value vs concerns.

A macro trade entirely built around the framework of «US domestic growth and reflation» + pro-business policy mix + a sprinkling of «animal spirits» = long Spooz / long Russell / long value vs growth / long cyclicals vs defensives / short FY / short Eurodollar futs (largest net spec shorts ever recorded per last Friday's CFTC data) / long CNH / long copper vs short gold / short EM / short EUR / short Yen» again almost singularly hinges on the Dollar.

I ran calculations on owning vs renting last week but the home values vs renting costs are not nearly as huge of a difference in my area.

In the current survey 22 % of home buyers thought home prices were fairly valued vs 22 % in the first quarter of 2010, vs. 23 % in the fourth quarter of 2009, vs. 24 % who so believed in the third quarter, vs. 18 % who so believed in the second quarter Florida home prices survey and vs. 15 % who so believed in the first quarter 2009 Florida home prices survey.

In the current survey 22 % of home buyers thought home prices were fairly valued vs 23 % in the fourth quarter of 2009, vs. 24 % who so believed in the third quarter, vs. 18 % who so believed in the second quarter Florida home prices survey and vs. 15 % who so believed in the first quarter Florida home prices survey.

Not exact matches

We have already discussed these close encounters, the tactical value of supermaneuverability vs stealthiness, the ROE, etc..

Echelon is now focusing its growth on «smart» commercial & municipal LED lighting (although its fab-less chip business has apparently now stabilized after a long decline), and if the lighting business accelerates (and it could, due to recent sales force hires and new products), I think there's a chance it can hit a break - even annualized revenue run - rate of $ 40 million by Q4 - 2019 (pushed back from my earlier hoped - for timeline) at which point — assuming $ 14 million of remaining net cash (vs. an estimated $ 18 million at the end of Q2 2018) and 4.7 million shares outstanding (vs 4.52 million today), an enterprise value of 1x revenue on this 53 % gross margin company would put the stock in the mid - $ 11s per share.

The banks sector continues to trade at a ~ 14 % to the market (~ 33 % discount to industrials vs LT average of ~ 22 %), and we see relative value at current levels.»