Sentences with phrase «value your person too»

Not exact matches

It works the other way, too — producers value the things they create by what other people are willing to pay, rather than the (often smaller) amount that it cost them to produce.

Socially, too great a focus on the other person's values in the aggregate results in what economists call «dead weight loss «-- a loss in efficiency in the market overall.

And when you hire new employees, make sure they are the kind of people who are willing and able to live out your brand values, too.

Cryptocurrencies» extreme volatility dissuades many people from using them to pay for things, and vendors from allowing payments in Bitcoin — it's too hard to accurately price things in Bitcoin, and when the value is rising there's more to gain from hoarding Bitcoins than from spending them.

Be generous with your expertise and share it in such a way that the information has value and people want to pass it along on social media, too.

Successful — and unsuccessful — people often try too hard to add value.

Too many businesses think it's all about their product or service, but if there isn't the alignment with the vision and values, and your people don't culturally get what your brand is about, it doesn't matter how good that product or service is.

All too often, I see people skip the process of defining their value proposition.

When your people know that you take these values seriously, and that you will accept nothing less, then they will live them too.

People attempt to include the value of comedy within their content all the time, and for good reason too.

Be clear about what you and the company value, recruit people with the same values yet different personalities and make it their culture, too.

Cryptocurrency are digital currencies too, however the important distinction rests in the fact that unlike centralized money that is managed by the banks on behalf of the governments and the people, cryptocurrencies are encrypted store of value that abides by the mathematical laws of their design and creation, which is controlled by the people themselves.

Of course, many people now feel that big banks don't have to worry about bad performance being magnified because under the implicit «too - big - to - fail» guarantee of the government, they won't have to take the losses when asset values decline.

You can certainly make the case that a «business» has assets and thus value so it SHOULD be included, just like our cars or even homes for that matter (which some people also don't believe should go in there since you need one to live in), but for me it's just too unstable to be accounted for on an ongoing basis.

Too many people get in trouble expecting huge returns in value.

Ours is indeed a consumeristic culture, the kind that too often turns people into commodities, and I believe Christians can speak into that culture in a unique, life - giving way — not only as it concerns sex - on - demand, but also as it concerns food - on - demand, celebrity - on - demand, stuff - on - demand, cheap - goods - on - demand, pornography - on - demand, entertainment - on - demand, comfort - on - demand, distraction - on - demand, information - on - demand, power - on - demand, energy - on - demand, and all those habits that tend to thrive at the expense of the dignity and value of our fellow human beings or our planet.

So, too, does faith consist of certain basic assumptions: assumptions about meaning and value, certain attitudes about the proper way to relate to people and to the world, and certain presuppositions about what is most important and most valuable in life.

They emphasized historical continuity enough to make people painfully responsible for the future and too little to allow anyone's achievements any lasting value.

There was general agreement that the series was too short; the value might have been increased if a part of each session had been spent in smaller interaction groups of not over ten people.

I think too many people took 9/11 at face value.

That is not to say there shouldn't be Christian or other religious values present but it is to say that people shouldn't be conned and public opinion shouldn't be manipulated by claims of righteous values — as we have seen, it is just too easy to fake and sway people to support what may not be in their best interests based on having a cloak of religion.

In fact, the religious view considers the secularist «mechanical materialist view of reality as too reductionist and as leaving out the «organic» and «spiritual» dimensions of human being and history and therefore as unable to renew the values of humanism and its reverence for life and the dignity of the human person in society in the name of which secularism started to protest against religious authoritarianism.

I value freedom of expression myself — but I like people's creativity too.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

1) He is behind Cech and Ospina or Cech and Martinez for the moment, 2) Poland are in the WC and it is essential that their first team keeper gets a full season of competitive games before summer 2018, 3) His value has increased significantly since 2015 and he is a valuable commodity for the Arsenal, 4) He may feel betrayed or undervalued by some of the fan base but he is too smart a person to let that decide his fate....

Moreover, I care about the people of the Western countries too, and I actually care about Western values.

These benefits include but are not limited to the power of the human touch and presence, of being surrounded by supportive people of a family's own choosing, security in birthing in a familiar and comfortable environment of home, feeling less inhibited in expressing unique responses to labor (such as making sounds, moving freely, adopting positions of comfort, being intimate with her partner, nursing a toddler, eating and drinking as needed and desired, expressing or practicing individual cultural, value and faith based rituals that enhance coping)-- all of which can lead to easier labors and births, not having to make a decision about when to go to the hospital during labor (going too early can slow progress and increase use of the cascade of risky interventions, while going too late can be intensely uncomfortable or even lead to a risky unplanned birth en route), being able to choose how and when to include children (who are making their own adjustments and are less challenged by a lengthy absence of their parents and excessive interruptions of family routines), enabling uninterrupted family boding and breastfeeding, huge cost savings for insurance companies and those without insurance, and increasing the likelihood of having a deeply empowering and profoundly positive, life changing pregnancy and birth experience.

They see the EU as intervening far too much in the economy (regulating standards, sustaining some employment rights) and far too concerned with shaping our culture and values (all that protecting of local products and brands, forcibly bringing peoples together).

More than a quarter (28 per cent) of people who left the armed forces early cited too many deployments as an important factor, 32 per cent named the quality of equipment and 33 per cent said they did not feel valued.

Time value of money combined with a drop in rate from 55 % to possibly 20 % is clearly expected to prove too tempting for people to resist.

In her resignation statement, she declined to offer the customary expressions of praise and thanks to the prime minister, and instead declared that she wanted to «help the Labour party to reconnect with the British people, to remind them that our values are their values, that their hopes and dreams are ours too».

And this is our message to the people of the UK: if you value parliamentary sovereignty, our legal system, public services or democratically made rules to protect society and the environment, tell your MEP and MP that they must stop this toxic trade deal before it's too late.

«I think, and I feel many people do, that Nick's leadership has just been too bland, he's not been bold enough in advancing liberal values,» says Simon Titley, Co-Editor of The Liberator magazine, a critic from the left of the party.

«I looked at people like [cognitive neuroscientist] Stanislas Dehaene, whose research illustrated the value of using neuroscience to ask questions about numerical cognition and knowledge acquisition, and I said, «I want to do this too.»»

M: Overall, there are major differences in performance in relation to money spent, and the correlation tends to be that the best performers are countries which, in effect, make sure that young people are set free to pursue their own agenda and express their creativity, and that systems that entrench the young too long in training or in hierarchical structures of apprenticeship and deference to their elders don't get the same value for their money.

The biggest problem with hair tests is not the test itself but the fact that far too many people — including doctors and other health practitioners — misread the initial hair tests and take the low levels in the initial readings at face value.

As a competitive runner with asthma and scoliosis, Blakeney knows all too well the health challenges people face, but she can also attest to the therapeutic value of running and yoga, which have helped her breathe better and achieve a more stable alignment.

And I am so happy there're lots of like - minded people who value that too!

Absolutely love this, it's something I really believe in too — especially in the working environment where a really disappointing number of people don't seem to share the same values (at least in my experience)!

Other than ethically producing fine items of clothing using eco-conscious fibers, AG Jeans» values demand that the they are socially active too: the brand is devoted to making a positive change by partnering with Water, a charity dedicated to bringing clean and safe drinking water to people in developing nations.

I would be the last person to suggest that men and women shouldn't be looking for someone who is their perfect match, but when reservation values are set too high people risk never meeting a person to who meets that standard.

There's plenty of choice too; eHarmony is home to thousands of professional singles looking for love online with people who share their values — they're based across the UK and the list is growing every day.

There's plenty of choice too; eHarmony is home to thousands of singles from every country and culture imaginable — African, Caribbean, European, Pakistani, Japanese and more — looking for love online with people who share their values.

Online daters spend 7x many hours screening profiles and e-mailing than in actual face - to - face interactions.They spend too much time conducting searches based on attributes they do not value highly, failing to connect with people for offline dates, and finding the few offline dates they do schedule to be unsatisfying.

Our specially designed questionnaire is designed to match you with people who share not just your interests but your core values, too.

Too many times people discredit the value of online dating and how deep a relationship can be when it is created between people who get to know one another before they officially meet.

That's why we've made it easy to search for and find people who share not just your interests but your values, too.

That's why we've made it easy to search for Asian singles and find people who share not just your interests but your values, too.

Back then, I was often too embarrassed... the other person wants and values the same...

I value honesty above all else and sometimes I'm just too honest for people that they get easily offende..