Otherwise known as «collaborative consumption,» the sharing economy is essentially built around the core
values of people sharing their resources with one another.
Not exact matches
A remarkable number
of them —
people who say they
value environmental action — openly
share how they consider themselves leaders while in the same breath saying they haven't actually changed behavior conflicting with their
values, but they're aware.
When asked to select the articles they'd
share, activity in the brain regions associated with assessing
value, self - related thinking, and, crucially, considering other
people's perspective showed a flurry
of activity.
They are Social Currency (e.g.,
sharing things that make
people look good), Triggers (acknowledging that we talk about things that are top -
of - mind), Emotion, Public (imitating what we see others do), Practical
Value (news
people can use) and Stories (information passed along under the guise
of idle chitchat).
Generally speaking,
people actively
share books if: it makes them look smart, successful, or high status; they took a lot
of value from the book; in some way they associate the book with an identity they desire and want to broadcast to the world.
By empowering its supporters through the company's social mission, it can create a strong and loyal following
of people who
share similar
values.
One
of those shortcuts is social proofing: Seeing a
person who has 20,000 followers and is following only 200 indicates they must have something
of value to
share with their audience.
I
shared in my book, The 5 Languages
of Appreciation at Work, five ways that
people could show others they're
valued — through words
of affirmation, acts
of service, quality time, tangible gifts and physical touch.
It's important to today's young
people to work for a company they can be proud
of — one that
shares their
values and concerns.
The media startup,
valued at $ 11 billion in its latest round
of funding, says the number
of «pinners,» or
people sharing images and links, has doubled on its platform in the last 18 months and the number
of searches on its service have increased by 81 % over the last year.
«While Mr. MacManus has a career
of service in the State Department, it is concerning that the Trump administration is considering nominating ambassadors that do not
share the conservative
values of the American
people who voted for President Trump, and in this case, who helped then - Secretary Clinton clean up her Benghazi mess,» Lee told the Washington Free Beacon.
They have a small group
of friends who
share brilliant ideas and may co-invest or make strategic introductions,» Povlitz has witnessed.She says they understand that
people and information have as much
value as money, and that real wealth involves the right combination and proper use
of each.
I think most
people would agree that holding 20 percent
of the
shares entitles Musk to some input on what
value is being maximized.
But think about just the most basic level,
people who come to Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Messenger, about 100 billion times a day to
share content or a message with a specific set
of people, and I think that that basic functionality,
people understand because we have the controls in line every time, and given the volume
of the activity and the
value that
people tell us that they are getting from that, I think that that control in line does seem to be working fairly well.
Plenty
of the
people at the Severn plant have come to
share the Centenaris» dream
of building a big company — particularly when Paul predicts, as he did at one recent meeting, how much their stock appreciation rights will rise in
value if Atlas keeps growing at its current pace.
Do you have a culture
of people who A.
share a set
of values, B. have very clear responsibilities, and C. perform?
Social media, where
people participate and
share instead
of simply ingesting, has the potential to channel our excess
of intellect, energy and time — the «cognitive surplus»
of the title — into projects that offer more public
value than does basting ourselves in Simpsons reruns.
If your mission stands out, you are more likely to be able to hire
people who understand and
share your goal; to find managers and executives who are good leaders and understanding employers; to together agree on a core set
of company
values that strike a chord with everyone on your team.
I know how many
of you
share my love
of the Lean Startup, who believe deeply in its potential to create stronger, leaner companies full
of people who know that their work has
value and their time is not being wasted.
The following may be true
of a potential takeover: • the company has fewer than 50 million
shares outstanding; • management is dominated by
persons near retirement age; • management's record on innovations and improving returns has been poor; • the company owns assets whose market
values are potentially higher than those shown on the balance sheet; • outside investors have been steadily buying the stock.
«What matters and should matter to politicians and
people who believe in the kind
of values that I believe the National Citizens» Coalition
share and the Reform Party
share is not whether the Canadian state prospers, but whether the Canadian
people and the land we call Canada prosper.»
You jointly with another
person (s) who is (are) not Family Members if that other
person has not included the
value of the
shares as cumulative quantity discount eligible
shares for purposes
of that
person's separate investments in Franklin Templeton fund
shares;
The health and safety
of our
people is the first step towards transforming mineral resources into
shared value.
The
value of a co-working space beyond the physical office is the community
of people that are drawn to a
shared space.
That is where there is a margin call for payment because the
value of shares is less than what
person owes on them because
of a loan with a margin between...
Important factors that may affect the Company's business and operations and that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to, increased competition; the Company's ability to maintain, extend and expand its reputation and brand image; the Company's ability to differentiate its products from other brands; the consolidation
of retail customers; the Company's ability to predict, identify and interpret changes in consumer preferences and demand; the Company's ability to drive revenue growth in its key product categories, increase its market
share, or add products; an impairment
of the carrying
value of goodwill or other indefinite - lived intangible assets; volatility in commodity, energy and other input costs; changes in the Company's management team or other key personnel; the Company's inability to realize the anticipated benefits from the Company's cost savings initiatives; changes in relationships with significant customers and suppliers; execution
of the Company's international expansion strategy; changes in laws and regulations; legal claims or other regulatory enforcement actions; product recalls or product liability claims; unanticipated business disruptions; failure to successfully integrate the Company; the Company's ability to complete or realize the benefits from potential and completed acquisitions, alliances, divestitures or joint ventures; economic and political conditions in the nations in which the Company operates; the volatility
of capital markets; increased pension, labor and
people - related expenses; volatility in the market
value of all or a portion
of the derivatives that the Company uses; exchange rate fluctuations; disruptions in information technology networks and systems; the Company's inability to protect intellectual property rights; impacts
of natural events in the locations in which the Company or its customers, suppliers or regulators operate; the Company's indebtedness and ability to pay such indebtedness; the Company's dividend payments on its Series A Preferred Stock; tax law changes or interpretations; pricing actions; and other factors.
Important factors that may affect the Company's business and operations and that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to, operating in a highly competitive industry; changes in the retail landscape or the loss
of key retail customers; the Company's ability to maintain, extend and expand its reputation and brand image; the impacts
of the Company's international operations; the Company's ability to leverage its brand
value; the Company's ability to predict, identify and interpret changes in consumer preferences and demand; the Company's ability to drive revenue growth in its key product categories, increase its market
share, or add products; an impairment
of the carrying
value of goodwill or other indefinite - lived intangible assets; volatility in commodity, energy and other input costs; changes in the Company's management team or other key personnel; the Company's ability to realize the anticipated benefits from its cost savings initiatives; changes in relationships with significant customers and suppliers; the execution
of the Company's international expansion strategy; tax law changes or interpretations; legal claims or other regulatory enforcement actions; product recalls or product liability claims; unanticipated business disruptions; the Company's ability to complete or realize the benefits from potential and completed acquisitions, alliances, divestitures or joint ventures; economic and political conditions in the United States and in various other nations in which we operate; the volatility
of capital markets; increased pension, labor and
people - related expenses; volatility in the market
value of all or a portion
of the derivatives we use; exchange rate fluctuations; risks associated with information technology and systems, including service interruptions, misappropriation
of data or breaches
of security; the Company's ability to protect intellectual property rights; impacts
of natural events in the locations in which we or the Company's customers, suppliers or regulators operate; the Company's indebtedness and ability to pay such indebtedness; the Company's ownership structure; the impact
of future sales
of its common stock in the public markets; the Company's ability to continue to pay a regular dividend; changes in laws and regulations; restatements
of the Company's consolidated financial statements; and other factors.
Important factors that may affect the Company's business and operations and that may cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward - looking statements include, but are not limited to, increased competition; the Company's ability to maintain, extend and expand its reputation and brand image; the Company's ability to differentiate its products from other brands; the consolidation
of retail customers; the Company's ability to predict, identify and interpret changes in consumer preferences and demand; the Company's ability to drive revenue growth in its key product categories, increase its market
share or add products; an impairment
of the carrying
value of goodwill or other indefinite - lived intangible assets; volatility in commodity, energy and other input costs; changes in the Company's management team or other key personnel; the Company's inability to realize the anticipated benefits from the Company's cost savings initiatives; changes in relationships with significant customers and suppliers; execution
of the Company's international expansion strategy; changes in laws and regulations; legal claims or other regulatory enforcement actions; product recalls or product liability claims; unanticipated business disruptions; failure to successfully integrate the business and operations
of the Company in the expected time frame; the Company's ability to complete or realize the benefits from potential and completed acquisitions, alliances, divestitures or joint ventures; economic and political conditions in the nations in which the Company operates; the volatility
of capital markets; increased pension, labor and
people - related expenses; volatility in the market
value of all or a portion
of the derivatives that the Company uses; exchange rate fluctuations; risks associated with information technology and systems, including service interruptions, misappropriation
of data or breaches
of security; the Company's inability to protect intellectual property rights; impacts
of natural events in the locations in which the Company or its customers, suppliers or regulators operate; the Company's indebtedness and ability to pay such indebtedness; tax law changes or interpretations; and other factors.
We believe that coworking happens anytime more than one motivated
person gathers to work with the intent to create
shared value for the benefit
of the community.
Sky News cited a
person close to the talks that Google's $ 30 million stake equates to 1.5 %
of Virgin Galactic's
shares and
values the company at $ 2 billion.
In other words, the
value of the
shares you buy with this fund isn't affected by how many other
people in the market want that
share.
If a lot
of people invest in vanguard life strategy is there not a danger that the underlying
share / funds will be over
valued.
Well the answer to that question is this: Forbes estimates the wealth
of individuals and rank them based on the
value of shares they have in quoted companies (companies listed on the stock exchange) and most
of the richest
people in Nigeria prefer to run their businesses privately.
Ms Scobie agreed that the 1 per cent increase in the group's interim and full - year COR «could» be information that a reasonable
person would expect to have a material effect on the price or
value of its
shares, but maintained that it did not have the relevant information at the time
of its upbeat AGM.
So, when you're buying
shares of a gas ETF, you're essentially betting that the
value of gas will rise from the time
of your investment, mainly because
people need gas and there's no really solid, widespread replacement for it (nor will there be for the foreseeable future).
Just to be clear about the incident when I was 18: some
of the members had been refusing to associate with non-members, or let their children play with them, on the assumption that «those
people» didn't
share our same
values.
Coworking is the gathering
of professionals who are still working independently, but who
share values, and who are interested in the synergy that can happen from working with like - minded talented
people in the same space.
As the organization grew, Johnson felt a hunger to step out and
share his story with
people who are uncertain, or ex-Christ-followers, struggling with belief in an age where evangelicalism seems to have given up its core
values in the name
of bringing alleged child molester, Roy Moore, into the Senate.
An organization could only count as religious, the regulation asserted, if «the inculcation
of religious
values is the purpose
of the organization,» if it «primarily employs
persons who
share the religious tenets
of the organization,» and if it «serves primarily
persons who
share the religious tenets
of the organization.»
Sex between unmarried adults might be inside that gray area between the ideal and the immoral if, first, no one's marriage is being violated by either party; second, if it is a union
of love and caring, not just a union
of convenience and desire; third, if sex is
shared only after other things have been
shared, other things such as time,
values, friendship, communication and a sense
of deep trust and emotional responsibility; fourth, if it is both loving and discreet, private, shielded from those who would not or could not understand; if it is
valued as a bond between the two
people involved and between them alone, never violating the sacredness
of the exclusive quality
of that moment.
Fascinating, that the idea
of sharing a meal between
people of different faiths, getting to know each other,
values, reasons for beliefs, the history, the personal stories
of why their faith matters... and seeing the conversation
of T.V. (which sounds very interesting to me) should provoke such unattractive comments is sad.
In his book The Neoconservatives (1979), Peter Steinfels described those on our side
of the barricades as «counterintellectuals,»
people who move in the intellectual world but who do not
share that world's dominant sense
of alienation and estrangement from the ideas,
values, and institutions
of the middle - American majority.
The
value of the body is largely
shared by
people, whether from religious motives or not.
They include: the command
of the sovereign; the majority
of the voters; the principle
of utility; the Supreme Court's varying interpretations
of the Constitution's great but ambiguous phrases; the subtle implications
of platitudinous
shared values like «equality» or «autonomy»; and even a hypothetical social contract that abstract
persons might adopt in the imaginary «original position» described by John Rawls.
So far I have argued three points: that
persons engage in behavior patterns which can be characterized as purposive, i. e., as exhibiting a structure
of aims,
values, and methods
of attainment; that individuals and institutions are interrelated, with each side influencing and being influenced by the purposes and activities
of the other, although with neither being in any way reducible to or explicable solely in terms
of the other; and that the institutional pole in this interaction
shares with the individual as its opposite those characteristics that define its behavioral patterns as purposive.
Some say that ending tyranny means «imposing our
values» on
people who do not
share them, or that
people live in parts
of the world where freedom can not take hold.
Understanding and appreciation
of the
shared beliefs and
values of those whom Muslims call the
People of the Book is increasingly important in the post — September 11 world.
It calls every member
of the Church • to renew their faith; • to make an actual effort to
share it; • to recognise, certainly, a growing awareness
of people to the changing circumstances
of life today; • to
value what is positive in every culture, while at the same time purifying it from elements that are contrary to the full realisation
of the
person according to the design
of God revealed in Christ.
Many seem to find that the most valuable aspect is contact with
people who
share their
values and their hopes for their children — a full youth programme requires its own separate field each year at Walsingham — and a sense
of community and solidarity.
In this connection it should not be forgotten that there is an «invisible college» made up
of persons from around the globe who
share a common vision
of the transition through which we are moving and who are seeking to find the
values that will carry us through to realize as much
of the promise
of the future as possible.