I asked a few folks about facets of this, among them Peter Singer, the ethicist at Princeton who's written for ages on animal rights and environmental
values on a finite planet.
Not exact matches
Whether you embrace Ausubel's technology imperative or seek ways to shift human
values and norms to fit infinite aspirations
on a
finite planet (or both, as I do), a thorough look in the mirror appears worthwhile.
Another keystone to better meshing humanity's infinite aspirations with life
on a
finite planet will be slowly shifting
value systems from the foundation up, not through some Beltway debate.
Here's a little pause, after days focused
on numbers (gigawatts of electrical generation, gigatons of emissions, square miles of sea ice), to reflect
on the
value judgments underlying efforts to mesh boundless human aspirations with life
on a
finite planet.