Sydney welcomes and
values people of every kind, with a population of over five million it is the largest city in Australia.
Not exact matches
«The
people for whom for any
kind of value - added support is useful with respect to economic immigration applications are [those] who don't quite fit,» she says.
And when you hire new employees, make sure they are the
kind of people who are willing and able to live out your brand
values, too.
The real
value of these
kinds of video - captured events isn't the few
people who watch for a few minutes simultaneously online.
The deal
values Kind at more than $ 4 billion, according to
people briefed on the transaction, marking a significant valuation for one
of the most prominent new food brands to hit store shelves in recent years.
People understand transactions as being a fair trade
of value: Something costs me a certain amount
of time, money or hassle, and I get some
kind of practical or emotional
value in return.
There are different
kinds of value for different
kinds of people.
If it had all been less
of a managed event, and more
of a glimpse
of the company's
values through the
kinds of people it hires.
BH: So, cryptocurrencies are a
kind of money, so long as
people ascribe
value to them and use them to pay for things.
People can support each other in all
kinds of ways, both physical and emotional, and they should all be
valued.
«What we are
kind of obsessed with is how you get
people recognition and
value for who they are and for their accomplishments or skills or their commitments and we think a badge is a really elegant and effective and
kind of 21st century way
of doing that,» Thorne says.
«What matters and should matter to politicians and
people who believe in the
kind of values that I believe the National Citizens» Coalition share and the Reform Party share is not whether the Canadian state prospers, but whether the Canadian
people and the land we call Canada prosper.»
That trend won't continue, and it will still be some while before Bitcoin has the
kind of low volatility that makes it a reasonable store
of value or unit
of account for
people whose alternatives are the dollar, the Euro, and other major currencies.
There are young
people who are passionate about any
kind of issue you could imagine, but that doesn't mean that they will see
value in participating in the currently existing political structure.
Welcome to REAL family
values, not just the political
kind spat out by the GOP as a result
of the latest focus group, but the real
kind, with
people connecting and loving and forgiving and bonding with one another to make it through life in a positive way.
Figure out what
kind of people are there, what they
value, how they think, and what they do for fun.
To hold that same - sex marriage is part
of the fundamental right to marry, or necessary for giving LGBT
people the equal protection
of the laws, the Court implicitly made a number
of other assumptions: that one - flesh union has no distinct
value in itself, only the feelings fostered by any
kind of consensual sex; that there is nothing special about knowing the love
of the two
people whose union gave you life, whose bodies gave you yours, so long as you have two sources
of care and support; that what children need is parenting in some disembodied sense, and not mothering and fathering.
Ours is indeed a consumeristic culture, the
kind that too often turns
people into commodities, and I believe Christians can speak into that culture in a unique, life - giving way — not only as it concerns sex - on - demand, but also as it concerns food - on - demand, celebrity - on - demand, stuff - on - demand, cheap - goods - on - demand, pornography - on - demand, entertainment - on - demand, comfort - on - demand, distraction - on - demand, information - on - demand, power - on - demand, energy - on - demand, and all those habits that tend to thrive at the expense
of the dignity and
value of our fellow human beings or our planet.
In about 2000/2001 I was in Austin to dialogue about emerging ministry, and facilitate a «culture clash» simulation game based on
values and beliefs
of people from the
kinds of «postmodern cultures» that I'd been interacting with since the early 1990s.
Some
people see simply no ethical problem at all with destroying embryos for research, and for them the study
of embryos for its own sake is certainly worth public support (we support all
kinds of basic research after all, rightfully so, and this basic research could be
of more
value than most).
But when you pray, spend time thinking about what I
value, what I have instructed you, how I lived my life, the
kind of example I provided, the
people I hung out with, the goals I sought to achieve, the relationship I had with God.
There can be no doubt,
of course, that the teaching
of our Lord is
of enormous significance, not only for its own intrinsic
value but also because it enables us to understand the
kind of person that Jesus himself was, humanly speaking.
The sacrament stimulates a
value response to an object other than itself — in this sense being a
kind of instrumental
value — by virtue
of a three - way congruence
of some sort involving
person, sacrament, an ultimate faith - object.
There are, he explained, two
kinds of value which
people experience: instrumental and intrinsic.
Positive
values result when the human personality is confronted with objects and enters into situations where there is some
kind of correspondence between the
person's nature and the nature
of the objects and situations.
To ask this, I must imagine myself into those circumstances as the other
person; to answer it I have recourse only to my
values — but these are grounded in the next, Kantian extension
of the imaginative habit: what
kind of world would this be if everybody were to behave / react in this manner under the same, possibly mitigating, circumstances?
This means that television is itself becoming a
kind of religion, shaping the faith and
values of many
people in the nation, and providing an alternate worldview to the old reality, and to the old religious view based on that reality, for millions
of viewers.
Underdevelopment is «unfreedom» and development is the process
of removing the various forms
of unfreedom and expanding the capabilities
of people «to lead the
kinds of lives they
value.»
People would socialize and bond less and less on the kinds of values that form rigid barriers to others» values and more on who THEY are — and when faced with billions of individual people, the reasons for fighting wars become less de
People would socialize and bond less and less on the
kinds of values that form rigid barriers to others»
values and more on who THEY are — and when faced with billions
of individual
people, the reasons for fighting wars become less de
people, the reasons for fighting wars become less defined.
Though many
of the
people I know are deeply engaged in a spiritual quest
of one
kind or another, it's getting less and less fashionable for Americans to frame their lives around their
values and beliefs.
Most
of the time, they've been so - called «
values voters» who demanded that their leaders be
people of faith, committed to traditional moral principles, and the
kind of politicians who stand up for the 10 Commandments.
It is a symbolic way
of talking about attitudes and
values of actual
persons who have been caught up in devotion to one in relation to whom they have found a new and ultimately satisfying
kind of life.
For, he contends, «without this
kind of approach, education in the parish will diminish in effectiveness, in numbers
of persons reached, and in the realization
of the increasing importance
of education in the church in a period
of national
values crisis.»
A lot
of people really don't want to hold their
values up to these
kind of standards.
Faith communities make one
kind of contribution when they do good as organizations; they make a different, and even more important, contribution when they nurture virtuous, committed
people who live out their
values in many different
kinds of organizations.
This
kind of broad association is
of particular
value to a society like ours, one in which
people are increasingly tribalized and segregated and even a laudable
value like diversity can be trivialized, as when a mother brags about how her child attends such a «wonderfully diverse» prep school, what with the boy from Senegal whose dad is a UN diplomat and the girl from Sri Lanka whose mom is an officer with the World Bank.
But while the «sufferers» try to practice love
of enemy in concrete ways, these
people (like the prudent individuals who take the first position) make love a
kind of theoretical
value.
You really think that Jesus would sanction your
kind of values when you curse out
people the way you do??? Wow... You need to read Matthew Chapter 5... ALL
of it!!!! Shame on you!
======= @GOPer «Attempts to justifying legislation
of their
values:» @Chad «seriously,, you are still trying to say that having some
kind of litmus test for what
people can lobby their government for is a reasonable and good thing?
No,
value in its systemic forms is pulsing with power, possessing capacities for concealment, beguilement and the like, achieving a
kind of spiritual hegemony over institutions and
persons.
Because he grew up in LA and has the
kind of «street cred» that is so
valued here, Trejo is looking forward to bringing the truck to the masses
of people on the streets.
«It's
kind of recession - proof because
of the great
value and all the different types and backgrounds
of people who eat here — business
people, tourists, locals, seniors and college students.»
I just don't know what their about.Don't we know there's a risk associated with signing any player?To me Lacazette is
value for money and I believe we are signing him at almost the right price.All we need is someone who can finish and Lacazette fits the bill.This is the
kind of mentality that won't see us winning trophies anytime soon.He was my last option for CF but I won't deny the fact that he's a very good option.
People are not able to justify the fact that he's average with facts.Yet the same
people say Giroud is world class and so on.Shame on those
people.They obviously don't know and understand what football is.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition
of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release
of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state
of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid
of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how
people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy
of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid
of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid
of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction
of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return
of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort
of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative
of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition
of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle
of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any
of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this
kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack
of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result
of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest
of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands
of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none
of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club
of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid
of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market
value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field
of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version
of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history
of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet
of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival
of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone
of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players
of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that
of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part
of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet
of those who were well aware all along
of the potential pitfalls
of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
The point is what
kind of values I want to teach him and what
kind of person I want him to become.
You'll find few
people trying to preach that today, though, unlike the «capitalism is unfair» aspect, even though they're
kind of inseparable (Marx's theory
of value etc.).
All it (NNPC) does is allow a group
of people, who themselves don't have any
kind of operating background to pay $ 50m for access to the crude oil in blocs
valued at over $ 2bn and they just take the crude oil, ship it out and don't return the money and there is no trace
of where the money has gone.
«I think
people put things out and it becomes the
kind of thing
people discuss, but I don't take things I hear and read at face
value.
As long as there are
people with the
values who yearn for a different
kind of society then you're going to have a party that tries to put those
values into practice.»
He added, «Richard is exactly the
kind of person we need more
of in Congress - a thoughtful public servant who puts his constituents first, shares their
values and has earned their respect.