There is the Big 6 route with agents, there is the mid-list traditional route with agents, there is the mid-list traditional route without agents, there is the small press route, there is the co-operative route, there is the hybrid route (think Amazon's imprints) and there is self - publishing not to mention the dreaded (read unrecommended)
vanity publishing route.
After an initial rejection and years of reworking her first novel, Jane Austen went
the vanity publishing route and paid London - based Thomas Egerton to publish Sense and Sensibility.
Not exact matches
Whether you choose to self
publish through a
vanity publisher, or search for an agent to submit your book to reputable companies, or go the
route of ebook
publishing, the marketing work doesn't fall directly into the lap of the company.
It no longer has the stigma of
vanity publishing, but has instead evolved into a perfectly viable
route to market.
As part of the
publishing programme, the BWA's substantial network of experts, agents and publishers (we do not work with
vanity publishers and this programme will not involve self -
publishing) will work with the author in an intensive way according to the their needs, to ensure the authors work is
published by a traditional publisher, but not necessarily via the traditional
route and that's where the difference lies.
There has been a lot of stigma towards
vanity publishing, would you always recommend against it or would there be situations where it might be both beneficial for the author and publisher to go the
route of
vanity?
With Bowker reporting an «explosive growth» of 169 % last month in «non-traditional»
publishing, it's not just
vanity projects that are taking the self -
publishing route these days.
There are many such self - publishers out there which meet the needs of those wishing to go the self -
publishing route, and most of them are legit — unlike the
vanity presses.
The question I would ask: Would writers really be better off if all the only options they had were getting
published by one of the Big Five or going the
vanity route with vampire companies like Author Solutions, and the only entrepreneurial paths would require hundreds of thousands of dollars of up - front investment?
For a long time picture book authors and creatives have been limited to either
vanity publishing, the traditional
publishing route or they were left to battle through the numerous formatting issues that was presented to them with self -
publishing images and text electronically.
Lots of self - pubbed authors who read WD go the
vanity route, and I've been against
vanity publishing for a decade.
Self -
publishing can be an excellent way of
publishing — but only for some books, and some authors; and
vanity publishers often masquerade as self -
publishing companies in order to take advantage of the growing interest in this
route, and to avoid the criticisms of what they do.
For most of
publishing history, the traditional
route was the only pathway to publication, unless you were willing to pay large sums of money to
vanity publishers to get a book out.