Liaised with auditors on activity based and standard costing, as well as
variance analysis for operations and marketing performance
Accomplished and talented Financial Analyst with strong working knowledge of financial statements analysis and reporting to business intelligence, adept in providing in - depth
variance analysis for various business units.
Planned approximately $ 250 million annual budget and updated monthly forecast; generated and reviewed monthly financial statements and performed
variance analysis for senior management
Completed a Checkbook (using Excel and VBA) to track and verify the budgeted expenses with actual expenses and
variance analysis for each department and organization as a whole.
Those include its highly profitable preprint business («insert volume forecasts and
variance analysis for preprint advertising»), circulation rates («documentation of approval of») and the broad area of compensation expense («including sales commissions and bonus plans»).
Performed monthly
variance analyses for selected grant programs.
Not exact matches
One - way
analysis of
variance was used to compare the mean number of nutrients that were correctly identified
for different labelling systems (continuous data), followed by Scheffe post hoc testing.
Because heterogeneity was substantial (defined as an I2 > 50 %), we used an inverse
variance DerSimonian - Laird random - effects model
for the meta -
analysis.
We compared socio - demographic and pregnancy - related characteristics among the three study groups using chi - square tests
for categorical variables,
analysis of
variance (ANOVA)
for normally distributed continuous variables and the nonparametric Kruskal - Wallis test
for continuous variables that were not normally distributed.
For variables with normal distribution, one way
analysis of
variance was used to compare mean values.
Complementary information to the Arctic warming
analysis would be using DWT's of the few left Upper Air stations in the Circumpolar zone and crunch up temperature trends of the entire atmosphere, when
variances from year to year are very small, but are mostly
for the warmer.
For each stimulation site (entorhinal and hippocampal), we completed a two (stimulation vs. nonstimulation condition) by three (blocks 1, 2, and 3) repeated - measures analysis of variance for latency and excess path leng
For each stimulation site (entorhinal and hippocampal), we completed a two (stimulation vs. nonstimulation condition) by three (blocks 1, 2, and 3) repeated - measures
analysis of
variance for latency and excess path leng
for latency and excess path length.
Statistical
analysis of One - way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Two - way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was carried out for comparing two data groups using GraphPad Prism 6 software for all experiments conducted in dup
analysis of One - way
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Two - way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was carried out for comparing two data groups using GraphPad Prism 6 software for all experiments conducted in dup
Analysis of
Variance (ANOVA) and Two - way
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was carried out for comparing two data groups using GraphPad Prism 6 software for all experiments conducted in dup
Analysis of
Variance (ANOVA) was carried out
for comparing two data groups using GraphPad Prism 6 software
for all experiments conducted in duplicates.
For continuous variables that were normally distributed, we used Student's t test or the one - way
analysis of
variance.
The
analysis of
variance for group differences in the ratio of Aβ42 / Aβ40 was significant (P < 0.001; Supplementary Table S9).
A one - way
analysis of
variance (ANOVA) was used to assess variations in the time spent by fish in the focal region or in each compartment of the focal region (front, B1, B2, B3, and B4
for the Top view and top, middle, and bottom
for the Side view, respectively) among the experimental conditions.
Statistical
analyses were made using either Student's two - tailed unpaired t test or
analysis of
variance (ANOVA) as specified in the figure legends, and Newman - Keuls procedure was used
for multiple comparison
analysis.
Exposing stats illusions Shalizi warns «causal - sounding phrases... encourage confusion» in many
analyses of
variance studies (where «due to,» «explained by,» «account
for» don't have ordinary meanings).
Interestingly, the influence of APOE ɛ 4 varied as the disease progressed; APOE ɛ 4 was associated with longitudinal FC decreases only
for HCs in the single
variance - based
analyses and deteriorated DMN integration in nc - MCIs by combining the effects of other loci.
Trenberth et al. (2005b) showed that the SAM is the leading mode in an EOF
analysis of monthly mean global atmospheric mass, accounting
for around 10 % of total global
variance.
In multivariate
analysis for various combinations of age, sex, and measures of fat distribution, WHR accounted
for 28 % and IAF
for 51 % of the
variance in SI, whereas age, sex, and interactions of age and sex accounted
for only 1 %.
Assay, sample and side - to - side variation were quantified by
analysis of
variance and presumptively incorrect decisions related to high - risk disease were determined using the result from each MRD assay, the mean MRD in the patient as the measure of the true value, and each of 3 different MRD cut - off levels which have been used
for making decisions on treatment.
In the meta -
analysis, grit accounts
for about 3 percent of the
variance in academic achievement outcomes when it is examined as a single predictor.
There is some evidence
for this, but the OECD
analysis finds that student socioeconomic status only explains 15 % of the
variance in test results.
Russ makes three arguments: 1) A recent study that compared grit scores among fraternal and identical twins suggests that grit may be heritable to a large degree, which would make it unrealistic to expect schools or others to be able to alter it; 2) The twin study as well as a meta -
analysis of grit research found that grit only explains about 2 - 3 % of the
variance in achievement scores, which Russ thinks makes it a poor predictor of other outcomes; and 3) The meta -
analysis suggests that grit may be highly correlated with conscientiousness, one of the Big 5 personality traits that psychologists have been studying
for a long time.
«Overall, results from the
analyses indicate that between approximately 24 per cent and 43 per cent of the
variance in written composition was explained by the three language convention measures and that spelling was the main predictor of written composition
for each cohort.
For the purposes of our
analysis, scores were standardized by subject, grade, and year to have mean zero and unit
variance in the population of students attending Massachusetts public schools.
The regression
analyses used to generate fitted values are weighted by the inverse of each observation's estimated
variance to account
for differences in the number of respondents from each state; unweighted regressions yield substantively similar results.
The HLM
analysis of spring writing scores among second - through sixth - graders (see Table 9) revealed that the school - level factor of collaborative leadership accounted
for 25 % of the
variance in students» spring writing after accounting
for fall scores.
Our HLM
analysis revealed that the school - level factor of collaborative leadership accounted
for 29 % of second - through sixth - graders»
variance in spring fluency scores (number of words read correctly in one minute), after accounting
for fall scores.
The HLM
analysis (see Table 16)
for grade 1 (175 students and 25 teachers) revealed that after accounting
for fall scores, 32 % of the
variance in spring comprehension scores was between teachers.
For grades 2 - 3, the HLM analysis on data from 348 students and 50 teachers (see Table 20) revealed that after accounting for fall scores, 33 % of the variance in spring writing scores was between teache
For grades 2 - 3, the HLM
analysis on data from 348 students and 50 teachers (see Table 20) revealed that after accounting
for fall scores, 33 % of the variance in spring writing scores was between teache
for fall scores, 33 % of the
variance in spring writing scores was between teachers.
The HLM
analysis (see Table 13)
for grade 1 (188 students and 27 teachers) revealed that after accounting
for fall scores, 41 % of the
variance in spring fluency scores was between teachers.
For spring letter - name knowledge, the HLM analysis on data from 184 students and 26 teachers revealed that after accounting for fall scores, teachers accounted for 38 % of the variance in students» spring scor
For spring letter - name knowledge, the HLM
analysis on data from 184 students and 26 teachers revealed that after accounting
for fall scores, teachers accounted for 38 % of the variance in students» spring scor
for fall scores, teachers accounted
for 38 % of the variance in students» spring scor
for 38 % of the
variance in students» spring scores.
For grades 2 - 3, the HLM analysis on data from 380 students and 53 teachers (see Table 17) revealed that after accounting for fall scores, 29 % of the variance in spring comprehension NCE scores was between teache
For grades 2 - 3, the HLM
analysis on data from 380 students and 53 teachers (see Table 17) revealed that after accounting
for fall scores, 29 % of the variance in spring comprehension NCE scores was between teache
for fall scores, 29 % of the
variance in spring comprehension NCE scores was between teachers.
The HLM
analysis (see Table 19)
for grade 1 (163 students and 24 teachers) revealed that 33 % of the
variance in spring writing scores was between teachers, after accounting
for fall scores.
For grades 4 - 6, the HLM analysis on data from 395 students and 56 teachers (see Table 18) revealed that after accounting for fall scores, 39 % of the variance in spring comprehension scores was between teache
For grades 4 - 6, the HLM
analysis on data from 395 students and 56 teachers (see Table 18) revealed that after accounting
for fall scores, 39 % of the variance in spring comprehension scores was between teache
for fall scores, 39 % of the
variance in spring comprehension scores was between teachers.
For research questions 2, an
analysis of
variance (ANOVA) was used to identify students» procedural knowledge in areas of fraction concepts and whether there was a significant difference on posttest results between the experimental and control group students» correct answers.
Three
analyses were conducted with the cross-sectional data using teachers» WSS ratings of student achievement and students» WJ - R standard scores: a) correlations comparing the students» standard scores on the various subtests of the WJ - R and the WSS checklist and summary report ratings of student achievement within the corresponding WSS domains, b) four - step hierarchical regressions examining the different factors that accounted
for the
variance in students» spring WJ - R scores, and c) Receiver - Operating - Characteristic (ROC) curves, which make possible a determination of whether a random pair of average and below - average scores on the WJ - R would be ranked correctly in terms of performance on the WSS.
The modal breed group (bull breeds, which includes all breeds derived from the molasser breed, Staffordshire Bull Terriers, Mastiffs and mixed bull breeds: as classified by the shelter staff using criteria from the UK Kennel Club) was chosen
for analysis to minimise the
variance associated with breed differences, and totalled 29 dogs.
Complementary information to the Arctic warming
analysis would be using DWT's of the few left Upper Air stations in the Circumpolar zone and crunch up temperature trends of the entire atmosphere, when
variances from year to year are very small, but are mostly
for the warmer.
For instance, an influential analysis by Hawking & Sutton (2009)(link to figures) has suggested that internal climate variability account for only about 20 % of the variance over the British isles on a 50 - year time sca
For instance, an influential
analysis by Hawking & Sutton (2009)(link to figures) has suggested that internal climate variability account
for only about 20 % of the variance over the British isles on a 50 - year time sca
for only about 20 % of the
variance over the British isles on a 50 - year time scale.
In fact, there's a wonderful variant of PDM based on the
analysis of
variance, developed
for astronomy, which not only gives excellent results, it's also optimized
for statistical efficiency and minimum computational workload (which really helps when analyzing terabyte databases such as come from modern satellite missions).
However,
for the above model
analysis, I have explicitly removed the 61 year cycle (and other higher frequency data) in order to examine the low frequency data, so I do not feel that your explanation is a likely explanation of the
variance.
«A multiple linear regression
analysis of global annual mean near - surface air temperature (1900 — 2012) using the known radiative forcing and the El Niño — Southern Oscillation index as explanatory variables account
for 89 % of the observed temperature
variance.
The Principal Component
Analysis (PCA) of the newly extended GACP record shows that most of the volcanic AOT variability can be isolated into one mode responsible
for ∼ 12 % of the total
variance.
In that workshop, reporting on trend
analysis in ACE in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, Saunders concluded that «No significant change in ACE index or ACE index
variance is observed anywhere, either over the full period or,
for the U.S., using the recent 1978 - 2003 period compared to prior 26 - year periods.
The data were analysed using a 2 (framing: loss vs. foregone - gain) × 3 (social norm: control vs. average - norm vs. rank - norm) between - participants
Analysis of
Variance (ANOVA [37]-RRB- performed using the anova function from the CAR package in the statistical computing software R (used
for all subsequent statistical
analyses).
To do this, we applied factor
analysis with principal - component factoring to find the readability factor that accounted
for the most
variance of the full set of readability measures.78 Our readability factor statistically accounts
for a large amount of the
variance of the full set of the composited readability measures.79
While there may be some minor
variances, this stakeholder
analysis probably holds true
for most corporate clients and most law firms.