Individual school policies and practices are very different and such
variation leads teachers to have very different experiences across schools.
Not exact matches
When small
variations in student test scores result in failing ratings for
teachers, and that can
lead to automatic termination, it forces
teachers to teach to the test, rather than teaching for learning.
The state department of education is seeking to establish
teacher - preparation schools that are free from state regulations so long as they produce high - quality
teachers — a
variation on the concept that has
led to the creation of more than 3,000 K - 12 charter schools in 41 states since 1992.
• too much school time is given over to test prep — and the pressure to lift scores
leads to cheating and other unsavory practices; • subjects and accomplishments that aren't tested — art, creativity, leadership, independent thinking, etc. — are getting squeezed if not discarded; •
teachers are losing their freedom to practice their craft, to make classes interesting and stimulating, and to act like professionals; • the curricular homogenizing that generally follows from standardized tests and state (or national) standards represents an undesirable usurpation of school autonomy,
teacher freedom, and local control by distant authorities; and • judging
teachers and schools by pupil test scores is inaccurate and unfair, given the kids» different starting points and home circumstances, the
variation in class sizes and school resources, and the many other services that schools and
teachers are now expected to provide their students.
It should come as no surprise that
variation in the number of math courses taken by
teachers in this group would not
lead to different outcomes in student achievement.
The public attention to
variations in
teacher effectiveness
led to an uproar — an uproar that helped focus the policy discussion and local bargaining.
Over the last decade, research in public education has
led us to three conclusions about the teaching profession:
teachers are the most important in - school factor in determining student achievement; there is wide
variation in
teacher effectiveness; and those differences really matter for kids.
Due to different decisions in state legislatures, pension rules vary from state - to - state,
leading to different vesting periods,
variation in
teacher contribution rates, and differences in benefit quality.
Student attrition and
teacher turnover at charters would also
lead to greater
variation between grades.
Regardless, such figures are often used because they give the public easy - to - understand illustrations, that
lead to commonsensical perceptions that
teachers are not only widely varying in terms of their effectiveness, but also that new and improved evaluation systems are helping to better differentiate and identify
teachers in terms of their
variation in (in) effectiveness.