Sentences with phrase «varied effects of the program»

Are there other student characteristics that coincide with varied effects of the program?

Not exact matches

Two studies have examined infant media use and subsequent attention problems in school - aged children.45, 46 One of these studies found that the effects of television watching on infants» attention span varied with the content of the programming.
In reviewing the available research on the effects of segregation on educational opportunities for black students, Rivkin concludes the effects of desegregation are most likely uneven and vary by program and context.
This policy recommendation is apparently based on a single study in 2000 of the Voyager summer learning program, although they note that a major meta - analysis suggests widely varying effect sizes from the evaluations of different studies.
The authors found that intervention effects did not vary significantly by program type, though the number of studies of each type was small enough that it would have been difficult to differentiate between program effects.
In this set of eight studies, Lalli and Feger (2005) was the sole example of a study designed to compare the effects of systematically varied structures in teacher leader preparation programs.
Rigorous studies (like this new study in Louisiana) often find at least some positive effects from voucher programs, and it is interesting and important to think about why the effects of voucher programs might vary across contexts.
Despite different findings on kindergarten's long - term effect on student achievement or how full - day programs differ from half - day in terms of quality and instruction, the issue remains that the amount of instructional time kindergarteners receive varies considerably from state to state, and district to district.
This study examined the relationship of community college programs and services to retention of students in four community colleges, with an emphasis on determining whether outcomes vary for students in occupational programs and how student characteristics moderate these effects, with the goal of determining what is correlated with success.
Many have written about the nature of programs in teacher education: too varied, too theoretical, too much reliance on craft knowledge rather than based on elements of research, too little research on the effects of teacher preparation programs, a lack of attention to determining their effects on student achievement, and so on.
Do program effects vary by race / ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status, or number of dual enrollment courses taken?
We show that the ranking of preparation programs varies significantly depending on whether or not school environment is taken into account via school fixed effects.
Employing a difference - in - difference estimator, we find that the loan forgiveness program decreased attrition of teachers in shortage areas, although the effects varied by subject.
The results of such a withdrawal strategy could vary substantially depending on investment performance during the period the program is in effect.
The observed numbers of shelter intakes between 1994 and 2005, during which the spay / neuter program was in place, were compared with projected numbers based on varying the proportion of cats in the voucher program that were owned versus unowned to assess the program's effect (i.e., change in numbers of shelter intakes).
Preventive interventions often find that treatment effects for certain outcomes vary across subgroups of study participants.11, 12 In this study, we examine how domestic violence limits the effectiveness of the home - visitation program in preventing maltreatment.
The evaluation, among other tasks, measures the effect of early childhood home visiting programs on child and parent outcomes, measures how effects vary for different programs and populations, and measures the cost of operating the programs.
While specific program components were not associated with greater effectiveness, longer follow - up duration was associated with greater injury rate reduction (p = 0.01) and intervention effects varied by level of care (p = 0.01), with the greatest effect in intensive care unit interventions (IRR 0.14; 95 % CI 0.07, 0.30).
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z