The point of the article was to demonstrate that the seasonal temperature response
varies by altitude.
so my expectation is that where CO2 becomes significant enough to promote a measurable amount of convection
varies by altitude, latitude, season, and geography.
Not exact matches
The lower edge of the stratosphere, bounded
by the tropopause,
varies in
altitude from about 18 kilometres at the equator to between 6 and 8 kilometres over the poles.
As recently borne out
by the work of IRD researchers and their partners in Kenya, their distribution
varies with
altitude.
The rich and
varied plant life is influenced
by extreme climate, a range of
altitudes and various soil conditions.
It's said
by suspected fossil fuel lobbyists and the idiots Trump has appointed to oversee environmental agencies that «scientists don't agree» over global warming, actually the problem is that the results don't agree, inasmuch as the graphs tend to be polynomial — also it's quite difficult to measure methane concentrations, it appears, as they
vary considerably according to
altitude.
Myhre's results show that the radiative forcing for 2X CO2 already
varies by about 10 % depending how the changing
altitude of the «zero - lapse - rate» tropopause is handled.