Sentences with phrase «various amounts of warming»

The first new study calculates the statistical likelihood of various amounts of warming by the year 2100 based on three trends that matter most for how much carbon we put in the air.

There is a lot of discussion about «what sceptics believe», listing various amounts of warming and various mechanisms as either in or out of this camp.

Not exact matches

So Palumbo and her colleagues ran the model with various plausible atmospheric thicknesses and extra amounts of greenhouse warming.

But beyond the increased amount of precipitation, Wehner adds, «this study more generally increases our understanding of how the various processes in extreme storms can change as the overall climate warms.»

There are various issues which may be affecting Nova and Apollo, it isn't easy to say for sure what the cause is but ensure that they are both getting an adequate amount of food and are kept warm.

(2) Various other arguments that basically amounted to saying that the effects of the warming were being exaggerated.

Apart from these last concerns, the WAIS is much less worrying than the GIS, because the huge thermal inertia and albedo effect of the EAIS, the antarctic continent itself, and the large amount of antarctic sea ice in the southern winter, all act to reduce the degree of warming for the WAIS (whereas the GIS is the victim of various unfortunate circumstances which amplify warming there).

The amount of warming depends on various feedback mechanisms.

There is no comparison to the amount of money being generated by various governments through taxes etc in the name of global warming.

I've seen lots of people make comments attributing 100 + % of the observed warming to humans, and they've pretty much all done so while claiming the «pause» is artificial — that the true amount of warming is being concealed by various factors (such as natural cycles or surface temperatures being a poor proxy for global warming).

I would really like to hear the opinions of the RC regulars, both real scientists and the scientist wannabes (like me), on what date you would pick on a time line and say, «by this point we knew about the A in AGW and there was very little doubt, even if we had a lot of uncertainty about the amount of warming and interactions between various parts of the environment, and we should have started to take action to reduce our emissions».

Putting the political aspect aside, I would really like to hear the opinions of the RC regulars, both real scientists and the scientist wannabes (like me), on what date you would pick on a time line and say, «by this point we knew about the A in AGW and there was very little doubt, even if we had a lot of uncertainty about the amount of warming and interactions between various parts of the environment, and we should have started to take action to reduce our emissions».

Looks to me like the much simpler argument that CO2 is a greenhouse gas; greenhouse gases enhance atmospheric warming; enormous amounts of CO2 are now being emitted via the burning of fossil fuels; and according to various measurements, the temperature of the atmosphere appears to be steadily increasing as a result.