Some advocates also stressed that charter - school students were outperforming traditional public - school students on
various measures of achievement, a tactic used in Florida as well.
Numerous evaluations of KIPP schools have found that students show larger - than - expected gains on
various measures of achievement.
Not exact matches
The study assessed performance on standardized
achievement tests as well as
measures of various character strengths.
to consider should be the following: 1) the
achievement of full employment or reduction in the unemployment rate; 2) increase the income distribution
measured by the Gini index; 3) reduction
of the levels
of crime in society; 4) increase in service levels
of education, health, housing and transport to the population; 5) increase
of the investment in infrastructure, education, health, housing and sanitation; 6) increase in the HDI - Human Development Index, used by the United Nations, which takes into account GDP per capita, the longevity
of people and their education (
measured by illiteracy rate and the enrollment rates at
various levels
of education); and 7) increase
of GNH (Gross National Happiness) indicator, which analyzes 73 variables that contribute most to the goal
of achieving the well - being and satisfaction with life (See GNH posted in website
Can we be confident that the
various elements
of practice
measured by TES are the reasons that students assigned to highly rated teachers make larger
achievement gains?
The report recommends
various measures to help close the
achievement gap, including: more investment in early years education; ensuring all schools have access to good examples
of top quality teaching and leadership; good careers guidance for all pupils; extra support for teachers, such as a mortgage deposit scheme to help high - performing school staff get on the housing ladder; and promoting and
measuring character development, wellbeing and mental health in schools.
We focused on research that examines how the
various attributes
of teachers affect student
achievement, counting as legitimate evidence only those studies that used this
measure of teachers» effectiveness.
Since ESSA requires the use
of proficiency rates, one design objective is a combination
of measures on academic
achievement to reduce both the short - term gaming around «bubble kids» (both real and perceived) and also the long - term incentive to lowball cut - scores for
various achievement bands on statewide tests.
According to the Executive Order, its recommendations were to include
measures of student
achievement (representing at least 50 %
of the evaluation); demonstrated practices
of effective teachers and leaders; and weights for the
various components.
They also embrace standardized testing as a way to
measure student
achievement, and both call for all states to participate in the National Assessment
of Educational Progress (NAEP), called «the nation's report card,» which tests students in grades four, eight, and twelve in
various subject areas.
While the short and long term
measures of this leadership work must include
various measures of student
achievement, we need to identify other metrics that
measure the extent to which teaching practice is improving every week — not every couple
of months or every year.
Overall, we find that neither reform had appreciable impacts on
various measures of school staffing, student composition, or academic
achievement.
The letter grade is based 80 percent on the school's
achievement score (which uses
various data including student performance on end -
of - grade and end -
of - course standardized test scores) and 20 percent on students» academic growth (a
measure of students» performance in relation to their expected performance based on the prior year's test results), resulting in a grade
of A, B, C, D, or F. «Low - performing districts» are those with over 50 percent
of their schools identified as low - performing.
So while high school graduation rates provide comparable
measures of the degree to which students in
various states are achieving state standards, the standards themselves are not comparable and may not be indicative
of a high level
of achievement.