Sentences with phrase «vast body of data»

Not exact matches

When reviewing the vast body of medical data, biblical teaching and biographical accounts of fighters, it seems unlikely.

An intellect which at a given instant knew all the forces acting in nature and the positions of all things of which this world consists — supposing the said intellect were vast enough to subject these data to analysis — would embrace in the same formula the motions of the greatest bodies in the universe and those of the slightest atoms; nothing would be uncertain for it, and the future, like the past, would be present to its eyes.

The body is a vast society of societies; the mind or psyche is a single, personally ordered society whose primary immediate data are indistinctly intuited momentary actualities forming the bodily societies.

The new computer models and the vast amount of data enabled the team to study the correlation between how quickly new species form and how rapidly they evolve new body sizes on a scale that had not previously been possible.

Despite the reasonableness of thinking that it would reduce the risk of a range of age - related diseases, so far «the vast majority of the epidemiological data does not support the hypothesis that body iron stores are directly related to the risk of developing CHD,» (2) and there's no evidence that it's protective against any other age - related disorder.»

The body of scientific data supporting exercise as the optimal means of metabolic regulation is vast.

«A few years of additional data are unlikely to overturn the vast body of evidence that supports anthropogenic climate change.»

This is NATIONAL, not global data about only ONE of many parts of the massive body of data that underscores the case presented by the vast majority of expert scientists who have published peer - reviewed papers concerning climate change.

Having observed this thread, I reckon that you are implying that there is a huge body of research, by a vast number of research teams, that could be compromised because, hey, they aren't sharp enough to get their data analysis methodology right.

Perhaps the data you cite is a start, but it is nowhere near conclusive, and it remains greatly outweighed by the vast body of social science data that tells us the legal profession is still highly segregated.