Sentences with phrase «vast majority of investors»

«For the vast majority of investors its wise to stick to your knitting and the blue chips.
The vast majority of investors reject the pitches thrown at them.
While the vast majority of investors are buying Bitcoin via exchanges, it's still possible to get the cryptocurrency for dramatically less than the current exchange rate.
It's why many experts estimate that the vast majority of investors lose money over any decade.
For the vast majority of investors, the greatest risk to their portfolio is bailing out in fear at exactly the wrong moment:
The vast majority of investors will try to buy the best investments they can locate either by them self or with a professional or collection of professionals.
No doubt, the vast majority of investors believe they pay nothing for the advice they receive, even if their advisor is nothing more than a mutual fund salesperson in disguise.
Yet despite emerging market stocks representing about one - eighth of global equity market capitalization, the vast majority of investors has much smaller allocations to them, dramatically underweighting the asset class.
The share price tracks the price of gold, and it trades like a stock, but the vast majority of investors don't have a claim on the underlying gold.
So, even after it became clear to the vast majority of investors that the Great Bull Market of 1982 — 99 had ended, mutual fund investors stood firm.
Nonetheless, the vast majority of investors should avoid market timing and follow the lead of Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger instead.
For the vast majority of investors, selling puts should only be considered as an outlet of owning shares down the road not as a way to earn additional income via premiums.
The vast majority of investors don't know what they pay each year for the management of their portfolios.
Almost without fail, the vast majority of investors who try to time the market bomb the task.
To start, in large part you can not even buy shares in it, meaning that the vast majority of investors can not participate in it.
Remember, you're already far better off than the vast majority of investors because you selected an asset allocation with your eyes wide open to its historical returns and volatility, so you can rest easily knowing that you made a well - educated decision.
So in the end for the vast majority of investors the active vs. passive debate is at best a sideshow.
However, despite their appeal, the vast majority of investors lose money with options.
For the vast majority of investors this represents the best way to invest given the relatively low time burden it imposes on the investor.
Given this, it is an interesting fact that the vast majority of investors tend to focus only on the capital gains component of total returns.
Bogle uses historical evidence and common sense to demonstrate that by «casting your lot with business», and simply buying a low - cost index fund that essentially invests in all the public businesses in the US, you are likely to outperform the vast majority of investors (including professionals) who try to beat the market through stock selection, market timing or betting on particular subsets of the stock market.
You are likely to do better than the vast majority of investors with a Total US Stock fund, a Total International Stock fund, and one or two low - cost, high quality bond funds.
That's a much better result for the vast majority of investors who can not psychologically handle a year where they're down 40 %.
The vast majority of investors end up with investment returns that are far below average.
Most investors consider themselves «savvy», and yet studies show the vast majority of investors consistently buy high and sell low over and over again.
The vast majority of investors don't know what they pay each year for the management of their portfolios.
The solution for the vast majority of investors is the humble low - fee balanced fund.
For the vast majority of investors preparing for retirement, this is a superior strategy compared to making a Roth IRA contribution and not saving on their current income tax bill.
And, in fact, I think the vast majority of investors can get along just fine with a conventional portfolio of stocks, bonds and cash (and get along even better if that portfolio consists of low - cost stock and bond index funds).
Other than perhaps overconfidence, recency bias is probably the most dangerous cognitive bias for the vast majority of investors.
However, the vast majority of investors lose money with options.
For the vast majority of investors looking to invest in corporate bonds, mutual funds make more sense than investing in individual bonds.
This is particularly true for large investors such as the Principal CITs (which at all relevant times had over $ 2 billion invested in index fund investments), that can leverage their billions in investable assets to negotiate lower fees than what is available to the vast majority of investors.
Hence, for a vast majority of investors who would like to tailor investments depending on equity markets, these funds prove to be both profitable and defensive.
Despite all of this information I would argue that the vast majority of investors are not rigorous enough in their use of data.
I think for the vast majority of investors a broadly diversified portfolio of index funds, rebalanced regularly with an eye on taxes and expenses should be their default approach.
I believe index funds are the best investment vehicle for the vast majority of investors.
Today, the vast majority of investors and issuers alike prefer to keep electronic records on bond ownership.
Nonetheless, the vast majority of investors should avoid market timing and follow the lead of Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger instead.
With these markets now reaching 50 % of world GDP, this makes perfect sense — unfortunately, it's also a reminder the vast majority of investors are dramatically under - weight these markets.
The vast majority of investors do not want out — the opposite is actually true.
The vast majority of investors are highly overconfident when it comes to their investment acumen and investment returns.
I think Buffett is right that the vast majority of investors who are trying to jump in and out of ideas (even every few years) will have a very difficult time beating someone who just buys a basket of American stocks and does nothing for a few decades.
But in terms of their trailing medium - term returns & significant valuation discounts (see here & here), this burst of out - performance is none too surprising... Regardless, I'd expect the vast majority of investors to remain focused on seeking gains closer to home for the foreseeable future, while any developed market wobbles would likely infect emerging & frontier markets anyway — so exposure via high quality / growth Western companies still appears to offer better risk / reward.
As the vast majority of investors choose the conventional route of active management through mutual funds (the second half of the book is a stinging critique of the shortcomings of active management), the author says that constructing a well - diversified, equity - oriented, passive portfolio is an unconventional investment strategy but provides the best chance of success.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z