Sentences with phrase «vehicle insured on»

Once the young driver has turned 18, they have the choice of obtaining a new policy or simply removing their parents from the policy if theirs is the only vehicle insured on it.

You are protected only when you drive the vehicle insured on your policy (you are not covered for rental cars or if you are driving a friend's car.)

Make sure that the title to any owned vehicle insured on a business policy is in the name of the business as it pertains to insurance.

Not exact matches

Based on our sample driver, rates to insure a vehicle with basic liability protection cost with the five most affordable insurance companies in Great Falls average about $ 1,039 a year, which represented a 34 % reduction versus what the typical company charged here.

Yes they do, as long as they have an active Auto & General policy and have one or more comprehensively insured vehicle / s on the policy.

If the policy has three comprehensively insured vehicles, with three regular drivers, then each regular driver can have the application running on their respective phones.

Nor can I offer him one of my two dozen cars to use, as the only ones insured for all drivers (including, who knew, young ones) are the newer vehicles — a 2005 Lotus Elise and a 2002 Freightliner Sprinter, the latter with 175,000 miles on the clock.

On the new - car list, the Toyota Sienna and Jeep Patriot Sport are the least expensive to insure 2012 model - year vehicles, according to CarInsurance.com.

Unsurprisingly, the vehicle that's literally the least expensive 2017 hatchback in the country also is on the roster of the cheapest hatchbacks to insure.

The Countryman is the most expensive vehicle on our list of the cheapest hatchbacks to insure, thanks to an MSRP of $ 22,750.

Electronic stability control lowers insurance losses for damage to the insured vehicle but has little effect on losses for damage to other people's vehicles or for injuries.

Also, since insurance costs are in part calculated based on the year and model of the vehicle, it is often cheaper to insure a pre-owned car.

Insuring a vehicle with USAA that is less than 3 years old qualifies you for a discount on your auto insurance premiums.

When you use taxable savings vehicles, such as federally insured CDs or Money Market Funds with their stable share prices, you are using post-tax money and pay taxes on any earned interest on your savings.

Your quotes will ultimately depend on circumstances specific to you, such as what vehicle you drive, whether you've had any accidents or moving violations in the past five years, and what liability coverage limits you choose to be insured for.

The person whose life is insured must sign the application, giving permission for the insurance company to collect data, such as motor vehicle records, prescription drug records and information submitted on previous health and life insurance applications.

The different add - ons that are available will depend greatly on your driving record, age, location and the vehicle that you are insuring.

Depending on the type of insurance you're shopping for, you'll also need to enter details about the vehicle, home or business you're insuring.

The cost to insure your own vehicle may vary considerably based on the type of ATV you purchased, coverage options you selected, who operates the vehicle, and how many prior claims you have made.

The in - depth reward system registers each hit on enemy players and vehicles means that points for assisting in a kill are rewarded when the target is finally eliminated, insuring that everyone is credited for their contribution towards the team's success.

A shareholder in the Casualty Department, Mark has spent his legal career defending insurance carriers, self - insured companies and individuals on a broad array of matters including products liability, premises liability, motor vehicle accidents and medical malpractice cases.

The plaintiff was injured when the automobile he was driving was hit head - on by a vehicle driven a driver insured by State Farm.

Generally, the ORVA requires that off - road vehicles be insured when operated, but there is an exception in subsection 15 (9) of the ORVA as mentioned above, which hinges on ownership.

By its question, the referring Court asks, in essence, whether Article 101 (1) TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that agreements whereby car insurance companies come to bilateral arrangements, either with car dealers acting as car repair shops, or with an association representing the latter, concerning the hourly charge to be paid by the insurance company for repairs to vehicles insured by it, stipulating that that charge depends, inter alia, on the number and percentage of insurance contracts that the dealer has sold as intermediary for that company, can be considered a restriction of competition «by object» within the meaning of that provision.

(b) hold himself, herself or itself out as an adjuster, investigator, consultant or otherwise as an adviser, on behalf of any person having a claim against an insured or an insurer for which indemnity is provided by a motor vehicle liability policy, including a claim for Statutory Accident Benefits.

The C.A. allowed the appeal on the basis that «the ATV was not a self - propelled implement of husbandry but an off - road vehicle that had to be insured when operated by a farmer

(1) Despite any other provision of this Regulation and unless otherwise agreed in writing by the named insured and the insurer, subsection (2) applies to every motor vehicle liability policy that is in effect on September 1, 2010 until the earlier of,

If an under - insured or uninsured driver seriously injured you, a member of your family, other dependents, or occupants of your vehicle, the amount of insurance and the insurance endorsements that you carry, has a sobering impact on your rights.

By: Shaun Fluker PDF Version: Statutory Interpretation and the Traffic Safety Act Case Commented On: R v Kirollos, 2015 ABQB 474 Anyone who drives a vehicle in Alberta knows the law requires the vehicle be registered and insured.

In its simplest form, when a policy holder is injured in an accident with an uninsured driver, the policy holder can use the uninsured motorist (UM) coverage available on each vehicle they have insured and «stack» it together.

James J. Noonan is a partner at the firm practicing primarily in the areas of personal injury and insurance defense and particularly on construction litigation, insurance coverage disputes, motor vehicle, premises liability, and uninsured / under - insured motorist cases.

Successfully defended at trial and on appeal a breach of contract claim by an insured against his insurance company claiming the insurer failed to pay damages to a 2006 Ferrari F430 Challenge racing vehicle.

Stacking could also mean a person who owns multiple vehicle or is an insured on multiple vehicles adding together all applicable UM and UIM policies as the maximum recovery available.

On the opposite end of the injury claim spectrum is the Porsche 911, which had the best rate — just 4.5 claims per 1,000 insured vehicles.

Having your vehicle insured, whether a vehicle, car or truck, is legally required to operate your vehicle on public streets.

The Court went on to say that when the insured signed the Agreement, he would have reasonably understood that the vehicle would either be shortly repaired or if a decision was made not to repair, the storage would be discontinued.

The question was whether he was specified in the policy as a driver of the insured automobile by virtue of being listed on the Certificate as one of the drivers on the policy, notwithstanding being excluded from driving any of the vehicles on the same policy.

He's trying to recover on an under - insured motorist policy that unfortunately for him, is limited by the terms of the contract to «occupying a covered vehicle» as defined by the USF&G policy.

The C.A. allowed the appeal on the basis that «the ATV was not a self - propelled implement of husbandry but an off - road vehicle that had to be insured when operated by a farmer (more...)

-- On August 14, 1993, Ms. Janousek, a pedestrian, was struck by an uninsured vehicle driven by Shawn Montreul — After hitting Ms. Janousek, the vehicle also struck a nearby parking lot fence — The debris from the fence damaged three unoccupied vehicles in the parking lot — These vehicles were insured by Halifax Insurance Company, Canadian Surety Company and Mutual Insurance Company — None of the three vehicles came into contact with Ms. Janousek or the uninsured vehicle — As Ms. Janousek had no automobile insurance of her own to access for payment of accident benefits she submitted a claim for benefits with the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF)-- Originally the MVACF accepted the claim but on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. I. On August 14, 1993, Ms. Janousek, a pedestrian, was struck by an uninsured vehicle driven by Shawn Montreul — After hitting Ms. Janousek, the vehicle also struck a nearby parking lot fence — The debris from the fence damaged three unoccupied vehicles in the parking lot — These vehicles were insured by Halifax Insurance Company, Canadian Surety Company and Mutual Insurance Company — None of the three vehicles came into contact with Ms. Janousek or the uninsured vehicle — As Ms. Janousek had no automobile insurance of her own to access for payment of accident benefits she submitted a claim for benefits with the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF)-- Originally the MVACF accepted the claim but on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, cvehicle driven by Shawn Montreul — After hitting Ms. Janousek, the vehicle also struck a nearby parking lot fence — The debris from the fence damaged three unoccupied vehicles in the parking lot — These vehicles were insured by Halifax Insurance Company, Canadian Surety Company and Mutual Insurance Company — None of the three vehicles came into contact with Ms. Janousek or the uninsured vehicle — As Ms. Janousek had no automobile insurance of her own to access for payment of accident benefits she submitted a claim for benefits with the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF)-- Originally the MVACF accepted the claim but on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, cvehicle also struck a nearby parking lot fence — The debris from the fence damaged three unoccupied vehicles in the parking lot — These vehicles were insured by Halifax Insurance Company, Canadian Surety Company and Mutual Insurance Company — None of the three vehicles came into contact with Ms. Janousek or the uninsured vehicle — As Ms. Janousek had no automobile insurance of her own to access for payment of accident benefits she submitted a claim for benefits with the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF)-- Originally the MVACF accepted the claim but on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, cvehicle — As Ms. Janousek had no automobile insurance of her own to access for payment of accident benefits she submitted a claim for benefits with the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF)-- Originally the MVACF accepted the claim but on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, cVehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF)-- Originally the MVACF accepted the claim but on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. I. on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. I. 8.

Insurance litigation with emphasis on Motor Vehicle Accident Benefit Claims, Motor Vehicle Liability, Personal Injury, Catastrophic Injury Claims, Coverage Opinions, Occupiers Liability, Social Host, CGL losses, Product Liability, Defence of Insurers and Insureds; and Liability and Casualty insurance.

«The purpose of [an «owned but not insured»] exclusionary clause is twofold: «(1) to prevent an insured from receiving coverage on all household cars or another uninsured car of the insured by merely purchasing a single policy, and (2) to provide coverage to the insured when engaged in the infrequent use of non-owned vehicles.

In 2237466 Ontario v. Intact, the insured and insurer agreed that the insured's vehicle which was damaged in an incident would be cashed out on an ACV basis.

[38] On a plain reading of s. 84 (1) of the Insurance (Vehicle) Act, the provisions pertain to the statutory subrogation issues between the insured and the insurer, which issues were not before me in this litigation.

It held that Art 3 (1) of the First Directive precludes an insurer from being able to rely on statutory provisions or contractual clauses to refuse to compensate third - party victims of an accident caused by the insured vehicle [para 20].

At the end of the trial the Defendant sought to avoid paying the police sick bank amount on the basis that s. 106 of the Insurance (Vehicle) Act Regulations allows ICBC to avoid paying amounts for which a person has an «insured claim» through another source.

On average, it costs about $ 1,281 to insure a vehicle with full coverage protection in these five locations.

Some additional coverage may only be offered when comprehensive and / or collision coverage is purchased on the insured vehicle.

It is possible to find insurance companies who do not care about the titling of a vehicle, but most preferred insurance carriers require the named insured to be listed on the title.

When your travel trailer or towable camper is on an ERIE auto insurance policy, you can be covered for physical damage while it's parked temporarily at a campsite and for liability damage while it's attached to your insured vehicle.1