Sentences with phrase «vehicle is at fault for an accident»

Out - of - province insurers are required by law in British Columbia to provide no - fault coverage at the same levels as ICBC would be responsible to provide, when an out - of - province vehicle is at fault for an accident that occurs in British Columbia.

Not exact matches

«If you have an older vehicle, for example, it may be worth dropping collision coverage for at - fault accidents.

When you file a claim, your auto insurer will pay for the repairs to your vehicle and, if you are at fault in the accident, whatever repairs are needed for other vehicles involved in the collision.

That means that if you're found to be at fault in an accident, you'll be responsible for any damages done to other vehicles and injuries to yourself and anyone else involved.

The School Board advanced the position that such an interpretation would negatively affect the public interest, as it would effectively redirect public funds that could be used to enhance the educational services it provided to the benefit of the party at fault for a motor vehicle accident.

In Codner v. Goss, the defendant driver rear - ended a vehicle, but their defense was that they suffered a blackout and were not at fault for the car accident.

For car accidents, Florida has a special system called no - fault insurance that requires the owners of all registered vehicles to carry car insurance that compensates them for injuries they sustain in a car accident, regardless of whether or not they are at fauFor car accidents, Florida has a special system called no - fault insurance that requires the owners of all registered vehicles to carry car insurance that compensates them for injuries they sustain in a car accident, regardless of whether or not they are at faufor injuries they sustain in a car accident, regardless of whether or not they are at fault.

Victims of car accident injuries caused or worsened by a vehicle's lack of crashworthiness may be able to collect compensation, regardless of who was at fault for the car accident.

Compared to this, driver error of the other vehicle accounted for 70 % of the truck accidents, whereas both the drivers were at fault 10 % of the time.

For car accidents, Washington, D.C. has an add - on insurance choice called no - fault insurance that allows the owners of registered vehicles to carry car insurance that compensates them for injuries they sustain in a car accident, regardless of whether or not they are at fauFor car accidents, Washington, D.C. has an add - on insurance choice called no - fault insurance that allows the owners of registered vehicles to carry car insurance that compensates them for injuries they sustain in a car accident, regardless of whether or not they are at faufor injuries they sustain in a car accident, regardless of whether or not they are at fault.

The Defendant admitted fault for the crash but denied liability to the Plaintiff claiming that the Plaintiff «was not present in the vehicle at the time of the accident ``.

It is the assigned ICBC adjusters who, in the first instance, determine fault (and sometimes wrongly I might add) and ultimately the Courts who will make the final determination of who's at fault for a motor vehicle accident.

Fault or liability for an accident can be determined on a percentage basis for instance ICBC or the Courts may say that a certain driver is 75 %, 50 % or 25 % at fault f or a motor vehicle accident.

An experienced attorney can accurately evaluate and determine liability discovering who should be held at fault, whether it is vehicle manufacturers, distributors, retailers, governmental entities and drivers are all parties that may be held liable for commercial vehicle accidents.

For car accidents, Pennsylvania has an optional system called no - fault insurance that requires the owners of registered vehicles to carry car insurance that compensates them for injuries they sustain in a car accident, regardless of whether or not they are at fauFor car accidents, Pennsylvania has an optional system called no - fault insurance that requires the owners of registered vehicles to carry car insurance that compensates them for injuries they sustain in a car accident, regardless of whether or not they are at faufor injuries they sustain in a car accident, regardless of whether or not they are at fault.

For instance, within the context of a motor vehicle collision, any such contractual term establishing a subrogation claim would be contradicted and overruled by the specific provisions set out in the Statutory Accident Benefit Schedule and the Insurance Act, which purport that the accident benefits provider and at - fault driver receive a deduction for LTD benefits paid, not the other way arouFor instance, within the context of a motor vehicle collision, any such contractual term establishing a subrogation claim would be contradicted and overruled by the specific provisions set out in the Statutory Accident Benefit Schedule and the Insurance Act, which purport that the accident benefits provider and at - fault driver receive a deduction for LTD benefits paid, not the other way aroufor LTD benefits paid, not the other way around.

If you have been involved in an accident that involves a commercial vehicle, it is important to seek out the services of an experienced commercial vehicle accident lawyers, who can accurately determine who the at fault party is, and who is liable for damages.

It may take a savvy Boston car accident lawyer who may suspect that other parties may be at fault for your injuries, or even the accident, and who will retain experts to examine the vehicles involved and to obtain the necessary documentation to prove liability.

For example, if you were in a motor vehicle accident or hurt yourself at work through no fault of your own, you could file a tort.

A judge or jury might find the driver of the second vehicle to be partially at fault for the accident and assign a percentage of fault to that comparatively negligent driver.

As stated earlier, when it comes to who is at - fault for a rear - end accident, it is typically assumed that the vehicle that strikes from the rear is automatically at fault.

So in a pure uninsured motorist case where the other driver either can not be identified (hit - and - run or phantom vehicle are the most prominent examples) or has no insurance, your own insurance company essentially steps in the shoes of the defendant, assuming the at - fault driver's liability for the accident but also his damages.

This undoubtedly will be an issue that drivers, insurers and lawyers will have to address in the very near future, as the distinction between a vehicle's drive mode, autonomous versus semi-autonomous, will have a significant impact of whom is at fault for a motor vehicle accident, the driver or the vehicle's designer / manufacturer.

The other driver either being convicted of or pleading guilty to a criminal offence, such as impaired driving, or a traffic offence, such as failure to stop at a stop sign, will go a long way to proving the liability (fault) of the other driver in causing the motor vehicle accident, and thus go a long way to proving their liability for your damages suffered.

If you are an Ontario resident injured in a motor vehicle accident, you are entitled to «no - fault benefits,» regardless of who is at fault for the accident.

In addition to CPP death benefits and Section B death benefits (if the death is as a result of a motor vehicle accident), you may also be entitled to claim damages from the parties who were at fault for the accident.

In Florida, there is a rebuttable presumption that the operator of a vehicle which rear - ends another vehicle is at fault for causing the accident.

If your injury is the result of a motor vehicle accident, or if someone else is at fault for your condition, we can help you take legal action.

How vehicles collide is often relevant to who was at fault for the accident and the severity of the injuries suffered in the crash.

If the person who died in the accident was not at fault for the motor vehicle accident, family members may also have personal injury claims.

Any time there is a serious motor vehicle accident, the at fault driver can be sued for these damages that go beyond the Michigan No Fault Act.

You can be charged with leaving the scene of an accident even if you were not at fault for the accident and even if your vehicle suffered no damage.

The Ottawa personal injury lawyers at Brenda Hollingsworth's office are often asked about Ontario no - fault benefits and how they can be applied for after a motor vehicle accident.

In regards to the second accident, she was a passenger in a vehicle driven by her husband, who was deemed to be at fault for the accident.

If your wage loss will exceed the maximum monthly limit or the three year limit allowed by No - Fault benefits, a claim for excess wage loss benefits can be made by suing the driver of the motor vehicle involved in your accident and proving in court that the driver was at fault in causing the accident.

If you are not at fault for the motor vehicle accident, then you are entitled to further compensation.

Because of the higher level of risk associated with commercial vehicles, the law generally requires a greater amount of insurance coverage to ensure a trucking company can be held financially responsible if it's at fault for an accident.

For example, when a driver is at fault in a vehicle accident and is sued and loses, their insurance company is required to pay the amount of the judgment against them.

For car accidents, New York has a special system called no - fault insurance that requires the owners of all registered vehicles to carry car insurance that compensates them for injuries they sustain in a car accident, regardless of whether or not they are at fauFor car accidents, New York has a special system called no - fault insurance that requires the owners of all registered vehicles to carry car insurance that compensates them for injuries they sustain in a car accident, regardless of whether or not they are at faufor injuries they sustain in a car accident, regardless of whether or not they are at fault.

For example, the person at fault for a motor vehicle accident could be required to pay for the victim's medical bills, rehabilitation costs, loss of present and future wages, pain and suffering, permanent impairment and other damagFor example, the person at fault for a motor vehicle accident could be required to pay for the victim's medical bills, rehabilitation costs, loss of present and future wages, pain and suffering, permanent impairment and other damagfor a motor vehicle accident could be required to pay for the victim's medical bills, rehabilitation costs, loss of present and future wages, pain and suffering, permanent impairment and other damagfor the victim's medical bills, rehabilitation costs, loss of present and future wages, pain and suffering, permanent impairment and other damages.

If you are a passenger in a vehicle driven by one of your family members and that vehicle is involved in a motor vehicle accident, chances are you will have to sue your family member especially when it looks like he / she may be partly or wholly at fault for the accident.

In summary, contrary to what some people feel, whenever you are involved in an accident involving damage to your vehicle, regardless of whether you are at - fault or not, access ICBC's system to get the best possible deal for the repairs.

When your Vehicle is involved in an accident and suffers damages, whether you are at fault or not, dealing with ICBC for the repairs is often a difficult process.

This means that drivers who are involved in a vehicle accident have several options for recovery, including: file a claim with their own auto insurance company, file a claim with the at - fault driver's auto insurance company, or file a personal injury lawsuit against the at - fault driver.

If you are involved in a motor vehicle accident, even if you are partially at - fault, you may be entitled to compensation for your pain and suffering, loss of income, future care costs, loss of housekeeping and home maintenance capacity, amongst other things, in accordance with tort law.

Even if you are at fault for a motor vehicle accident causing personal injury, our lawyers are available to hear your case.

Ontario drivers who have insurance coverage on their own vehicles are covered for the benefits listed should they suffer an injury as a result of a motor accident, regardless of who is at fault.

Settlement conferences are mandatory in all BC court registries, except Robson Square in Vancouver, and except for motor vehicle accident cases in which liability is in dispute and a judge is asked to determine who is at fault and / or how much money to award the claimant, if any.

After investigating, local authorities stated that the driver of the other vehicle could face criminal charges, as she may have been distracted at the time and at fault for the accident as well as the death.

After some detective work, those acting for Garton Shires managed to obtain copies of the police accident report, which supported the conclusion that it was the Astra driving out of Leeds that was the vehicle at fault.