Sentences with phrase «vehicle is insured as»

If your personal vehicle is insured as a commercial vehicle and other members of your family use the vehicle for personal purposes, then you may have to get a «non-owned vehicle» endorsement.

Thus, in situations where a vehicle is insured as a private vehicle and is used to transport passengers for a fee, no insurance coverage would exist...

Not exact matches

The advantage is lower costs — independent contractors not only usually have their own vehicles that they maintain themselves but they insure them and themselves as well.

While virtually all vehicles are now privately insured this ratio is likely to drop massively in the future as self - drive cars replace privately owned ones in the urban areas.

And one additional question as this vehicle registration has been suspended for about 3 months — were the plates turned in and has the car remained insured while the registration was suspended?

Yes they do, as long as they have an active Auto & General policy and have one or more comprehensively insured vehicle / s on the policy.

I was a little reluctant to follow through as I have never bought a vehicle online before but Sal insured... me that once we got there I wouldn??? t be disappointed we proceeded to drive from RI to the dealership Once there we were speechless the truck was more then we expected.Sal was great to deal with and Luis made the paper work Seamless.the manger was great too.

Nor can I offer him one of my two dozen cars to use, as the only ones insured for all drivers (including, who knew, young ones) are the newer vehicles — a 2005 Lotus Elise and a 2002 Freightliner Sprinter, the latter with 175,000 miles on the clock.

For Acura and Mercedes vehicles with auto brake, claim frequency for injuries to the insured vehicle's occupants tended to be lower as well, while results were the opposite for Volvo.

After passing its Safety and Smog inspection by a Factory - trained Certified BMW Master technician every vehicle is put through a meticulous reconditioning process insuring the customer that the vehicle they are buying is completely detailed inside and out, as well as being free of dings, dents, scratches, curb rash or any other major imperfections.

Since most carriers cover the vehicles under their motorcycle insurance policies, shoppers can begin the process online as if they were insuring a motorcycle.

A high - yield savings account is an excellent vehicle for keeping your money safe, as long as the bank you use is fully insured by the FDIC.

• The Government has consulted stakeholders and will bring forward measures to implement Economic Action Plan 2013 initiatives to tie portfolio insurance to the use of CMHC securitization vehicles and prohibit the use of government - backed insured mortgages as collateral in securitization vehicles that are not sponsored by CMHC.

An optional coverage available with an auto insurance policy that pays a set amount per day for a specific period of time, to rent a vehicle while the insured vehicle is in the process of being repaired or replaced as a result of a covered loss.

When you use taxable savings vehicles, such as federally insured CDs or Money Market Funds with their stable share prices, you are using post-tax money and pay taxes on any earned interest on your savings.

Your quotes will ultimately depend on circumstances specific to you, such as what vehicle you drive, whether you've had any accidents or moving violations in the past five years, and what liability coverage limits you choose to be insured for.

The person whose life is insured must sign the application, giving permission for the insurance company to collect data, such as motor vehicle records, prescription drug records and information submitted on previous health and life insurance applications.

Also called a multipolicy discount, bundling is a rather simple process of insuring your valuables — such as your vehicle and home — with the same company, and the savings can be significant.

Additionally, all vehicles used as collateral will need to be insured against physical damage for the entire life of the loan.

Typically, auto insurance coverage — liability and collision — will cover the insured person's damage to his or her vehicle in an accident, the damage to the other person's auto or property if the insured was at fault, as well as medical bills, all up to the maximum stated in the policy and subject to the deductible.

Make sure that the title to any owned vehicle insured on a business policy is in the name of the business as it pertains to insurance.

Liability insurance is the minimum amount of insurance required, because it's designed to award compensation for injuries sustained by the insured driver as well as other motorists» vehicle damage.

[42] In other words, Part 7 (at least so far as it is concerned with benefits following injury, rather than death benefits) has two related objects: to compensate an insured person for a portion of the financial loss accrued from temporary total disability caused by a motor vehicle accident; and, where possible, to do so in a manner that brings about the end of the total disability by returning the injured person to employment or self - sufficiency.

At the time of the deadly crash, the vehicle Jared was riding as a passenger in was uninsured and Jared's parents owned five vehicles that were insured by State Farm through four separate policies.

The Court found that the Motorized Vehicle Exclusion was ambiguous as it relates to the nature of the activities intended to constitute an insured's «use» of a motorized vVehicle Exclusion was ambiguous as it relates to the nature of the activities intended to constitute an insured's «use» of a motorized vehiclevehicle.

Generally, the ORVA requires that off - road vehicles be insured when operated, but there is an exception in subsection 15 (9) of the ORVA as mentioned above, which hinges on ownership.

By its question, the referring Court asks, in essence, whether Article 101 (1) TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that agreements whereby car insurance companies come to bilateral arrangements, either with car dealers acting as car repair shops, or with an association representing the latter, concerning the hourly charge to be paid by the insurance company for repairs to vehicles insured by it, stipulating that that charge depends, inter alia, on the number and percentage of insurance contracts that the dealer has sold as intermediary for that company, can be considered a restriction of competition «by object» within the meaning of that provision.

The corporation and the UK - based lawyer are registered and insured in the relevant state in Australia, and the UK - based lawyer can give advice remotely using the corporation as the vehicle.

[54] Given the intention of parties to this type of insurance coverage, which is to compensate the insured person injured as a result of an incident involving an unidentified automobile, it seems unreasonable to enforce a term of the contract that demands physical contact between the insured motor vehicle and the unidentified... [more]

The Ontario Insurance Act defines «automobile» as either (a) a motor vehicle required under any Act to be insured under a motor vehicle liability policy, or (b) a vehicle prescribed by regulation to be an automobile.

As such, it was excluded from the usual requirement that it be insured under a motor vehicle liability policy.

(b) hold himself, herself or itself out as an adjuster, investigator, consultant or otherwise as an adviser, on behalf of any person having a claim against an insured or an insurer for which indemnity is provided by a motor vehicle liability policy, including a claim for Statutory Accident Benefits.

(5) Despite subsection (4), if a person is a named insured under a contract evidenced by a motor vehicle liability policy or the person is the spouse or a dependant, as defined in the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule, of a named insured, the person shall claim statutory accident benefits against the insurer under that policy.

If you meet the definition of «insured» as set out in Part 7 of the Regulations, then you can apply for no fault benefits if you've been injured in a motor vehicle accident.

Coverage is available under your policy for everyone in your household who is driving or riding in a vehicle insured in British Columbia, or if they are injured as a pedestrian or cyclist.

In any action in Ontario against the licensed insurer or its insured arising out of an automobile accident in Ontario, the insurer shall appear and shall not set up any defence to a claim under a contract made outside Ontario, including any defence as to the limit or limits of liability under the contract, that might not be set up if the contract were evidenced by a motor vehicle liability policy issued in Ontario and such contract made outside Ontario shall be deemed to include the statutory accident benefits referred to in subsection 268 (1).

Paragraph 27 of that decision provided: «It is thus clear that the Community legislature's intention was to entitle victims of damage or injury caused by unidentified or insufficiently insured vehicles to protection equivalent to, and as effective as, that available to persons injured by identified and insured vehicles.»

Stacking could also mean a person who owns multiple vehicle or is an insured on multiple vehicles adding together all applicable UM and UIM policies as the maximum recovery available.

As previously discussed, when a Defendant is insured with ICBC their ability to set up an «independent «medical exam can be compromised if ICBC exercised their rights to have the Plaintiff examined under section 99 of the Insurance (Vehicle) Regulation and if that exam went beyond what was required for a «part 7 ′ opinion.

If at the time of an accident the excluded driver is a passenger in a vehicle that she is excluded from driving, she could still claim recourse against that insurer as an «insured person» because she was an occupant of the vehicle involved in the accident (criteria (b) in the «insured person» definition».

The question was whether he was specified in the policy as a driver of the insured automobile by virtue of being listed on the Certificate as one of the drivers on the policy, notwithstanding being excluded from driving any of the vehicles on the same policy.

However, other parts of the Certificate identified him as being excluded from driving both of the described vehicles that were insured under the same policy.

He's trying to recover on an under - insured motorist policy that unfortunately for him, is limited by the terms of the contract to «occupying a covered vehicle» as defined by the USF&G policy.

In MA, as in every state in the nation, drivers are required by law to insure their vehicles.

-- On August 14, 1993, Ms. Janousek, a pedestrian, was struck by an uninsured vehicle driven by Shawn Montreul — After hitting Ms. Janousek, the vehicle also struck a nearby parking lot fence — The debris from the fence damaged three unoccupied vehicles in the parking lot — These vehicles were insured by Halifax Insurance Company, Canadian Surety Company and Mutual Insurance Company — None of the three vehicles came into contact with Ms. Janousek or the uninsured vehicle — As Ms. Janousek had no automobile insurance of her own to access for payment of accident benefits she submitted a claim for benefits with the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF)-- Originally the MVACF accepted the claim but on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, cvehicle driven by Shawn Montreul — After hitting Ms. Janousek, the vehicle also struck a nearby parking lot fence — The debris from the fence damaged three unoccupied vehicles in the parking lot — These vehicles were insured by Halifax Insurance Company, Canadian Surety Company and Mutual Insurance Company — None of the three vehicles came into contact with Ms. Janousek or the uninsured vehicle — As Ms. Janousek had no automobile insurance of her own to access for payment of accident benefits she submitted a claim for benefits with the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF)-- Originally the MVACF accepted the claim but on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, cvehicle also struck a nearby parking lot fence — The debris from the fence damaged three unoccupied vehicles in the parking lot — These vehicles were insured by Halifax Insurance Company, Canadian Surety Company and Mutual Insurance Company — None of the three vehicles came into contact with Ms. Janousek or the uninsured vehicle — As Ms. Janousek had no automobile insurance of her own to access for payment of accident benefits she submitted a claim for benefits with the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF)-- Originally the MVACF accepted the claim but on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, cvehicle — As Ms. Janousek had no automobile insurance of her own to access for payment of accident benefits she submitted a claim for benefits with the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF)-- Originally the MVACF accepted the claim but on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. I. As Ms. Janousek had no automobile insurance of her own to access for payment of accident benefits she submitted a claim for benefits with the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF)-- Originally the MVACF accepted the claim but on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, cVehicle Accident Claims Fund (MVACF)-- Originally the MVACF accepted the claim but on March 24, 1994 the payments ceased as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. I. as the Fund believed that one of the three insurance companies should be responsible for the payments — All three companies received an application for accident benefits for Ms. Janousek but denied the claim — The insurance companies were not able to come to an agreement and resolve disputes through mediation — Ms. Janousek then applied for arbitration under the Insurance Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. I. 8.

In Evans v Secretary of State for Transport and the MIB [2003] ECR I - 14492 (ECJ Case C - 63 / 01) the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that the UK's obligation under what is now Art 10 is to set up and maintain a system to provide compensation to victims of injury caused by untraced drivers «equivalent to, and as effective as, that available to persons injured by identified and insured vehicles».

In 1975, for example, the province's regulations defined an insured person as «a [licensed] driver... who operates or drives... with consent»; in 1984, the licensing requirement was dropped and the definition was broadened as «an individual who with... consent... operates the vehicle»; and in 2001, the definition was broadened further as «an individual who with consent... uses or operates the vehicle.»

[54] Given the intention of parties to this type of insurance coverage, which is to compensate the insured person injured as a result of an incident involving an unidentified automobile, it seems unreasonable to enforce a term of the contract that demands physical contact between the insured motor vehicle and the unidentified automobile, notwithstanding the existence of physical evidence corroborating the fact that the relevant incident occurred as a result of the insured's defensive driving action directed at avoiding physical contact with another vehicle.

As a result, it is actually less expensive to insure than many vehicles costing less than half as mucAs a result, it is actually less expensive to insure than many vehicles costing less than half as mucas much.

Additional Interest Insured Another person or company who may be liable for an accident involving an insured or an insured vehicle and who has been named as an Additional Interest Insured under the Insured Another person or company who may be liable for an accident involving an insured or an insured vehicle and who has been named as an Additional Interest Insured under the insured or an insured vehicle and who has been named as an Additional Interest Insured under the insured vehicle and who has been named as an Additional Interest Insured under the Insured under the policy.