Sentences with phrase «velocity strength gains»

Accommodating resistance training transfers well to constant load strength, and also seems to produce greater joint angle - specific strength gains towards the middle of the exercise range of motion, greater improvements in repetition strength, and greater high - velocity strength gains.

Therefore, it seems premature to suggest that maximal intent is the only factor that leads to high velocity strength gains, based on a single study with such limitations.

Not exact matches

Not to mention that decreasing the effects of the sticking point will increase the velocity of the bar and stimulate the activity of the more potent fast - twitch muscle fibers, thereby promoting greater strength gains.

In their famous study, Duchateau & Hainaut (1984) compared force - focused and velocity - focused training and reported greater gains in maximum strength after force - focused training (20 % vs. 11 %), but maximal shortening velocity only improved after velocity - focused training (by 21 %).

There are many factors that could cause velocity - specific gains in strength.

On the other hand, many studies have reported velocity - specific strength gains after isokinetic strength training at different speeds, where the intent was maximal in all groups (Moffroid & Whipple, 1970; Caiozzo et al. 1981; Coyle et al. 1981; Jenkins et al. 1984; Garnica, 1986; Thomeé et al. 1987; Petersen et al. 1989; Bell et al. 1989; Ewing Jr et al. 1990), and also after constant load strength training at different speeds, where intent was maximal in all groups (Kaneko et al. 1983; Aaagaard et al. 1994; 1996; Moss et al. 1997; Ingebrigtsen et al. 2009).

Many studies have shown that high velocity isokinetic training leads to greater gains in strength when tested at high isokinetic velocities (Moffroid & Whipple, 1970; Caiozzo et al. 1981; Coyle et al. 1981; Jenkins et al. 1984; Garnica, 1986; Thomeé et al. 1987; Petersen et al. 1989; Bell et al. 1989; Ewing Jr et al. 1990), although this is not always true (Farthing & Chilibeck, 2003).

Indeed, some studies have reported velocity - specific strength gains in conjunction with shifts in muscle fiber type or in fiber type distribution (Liu et al. 2003; Zaras et al. 2013), but others have found no changes in fiber type distribution, while still reporting velocity - specific strength gains (Coyle et al. 1981; Thomeé et al. 1987; Ewing Jr et al. 1990; Malisoux et al. 2006; Vissing et al. 2008).

In contrast, training with a heavy load and a slower bar speed leads to preferentially greater gains in low - velocity strength.

Similarly, if we train using a slow speed, we should see the greatest gains in strength when we test strength at a low velocity, and the smallest gains in strength when we test at a high velocity.

Eccentric - specific gains produced by neural mechanisms might not transfer well to COD ability, because of differences between the strength training exercise and the COD maneuver in terms of both movement pattern, and contraction velocity.

A cross-over effect of strength gains from one limb to the other could therefore have occurred, and prevented the identification of velocity - specific strength gains.

This probably causes differences in velocity - specific gains in strength between the two external load types.

There is good evidence that high velocity isokinetic training leads to greater gains in strength when tested at high isokinetic velocities, and there is weaker evidence that the same effect occurs after constant load training.

To prepare athletes for sport, are most interested in whether we can produce greater gains in strength at high velocities, by training using fast bar speeds.

Strength is velocity - specific, which means that training with a light load and a faster bar speed leads to preferentially greater gains in high - velocity sStrength is velocity - specific, which means that training with a light load and a faster bar speed leads to preferentially greater gains in high - velocity strengthstrength.

If the principle of specificity applies to velocity, then when we train using a fast speed, we should see the greatest gains in strength when we test strength at a high velocity, and the smallest gains in strength when we test at a low velocity.

On this basis, the researchers concluded that «intent to move quickly» is the only important factor for producing velocity - specific strength gains.

There is good evidence that high velocity isokinetic training leads to greater gains in strength when tested at high isokinetic velocities (Moffroid & Whipple, 1970; Caiozzo et al. 1981; Coyle et al. 1981; Jenkins et al. 1984; Garnica, 1986; Thomeé et al. 1987; Petersen et al. 1989; Bell et al. 1989; Ewing Jr et al. 1990), but it does not always happen (Farthing & Chilibeck, 2003).

Yet, both training programs displayed velocity - specific strength gains, with the greatest gains in strength being at the highest velocities.

Strength gains are specific: to the type of external load you use, although the effect is likely just a weaker version of the combined effects of range of motion and velocity.

The greater gains in strength - to - size that result from an increase in specific tension are not reflected in improvements in muscle power, because the reduction in contractile velocity counteracts the effects of the increased muscle fiber force (Erskine et al. 2011).

Velocity - specificity can be confusing for some, because some very influential research suggested that «intent» was the main factor driving velocity - specific strength gains, and not actual baVelocity - specificity can be confusing for some, because some very influential research suggested that «intent» was the main factor driving velocity - specific strength gains, and not actual bavelocity - specific strength gains, and not actual bar speed.

In other words, high - velocity (light load) training produces greater gains in strength at high speeds than at low speeds, as indeed many studies have reported for many decades (e.g. Coyle et al. 1981).