But, on the other hand, it is quite unjustified
for theists to hold that we must tolerate or swallow the paradoxes or explain them away (by feats of ingenuity so subtle, and
verbal methods so remote from intuitive insight or definite logical structures, that only deity could know with any assurance what was taking place), giving as
justification the claim that the alternative position of atheism is even more paradoxical (lacking, it may be urged, any principle of cosmic explanation at all).
When she talks about mutual
verbal provocation [FN39] in these relationships, the echo of the
justification so commonly used by batterers, that their partners provoked them by asserting independence or failing to comply with (often unreasonable) demands, makes Johnston's account uncomfortable reading
for those whose primary constituencies are perpetrators or victims of battering.