When K.B. testified, the judge while rendering his reasons for
the verdict accepted the evidence of K.B..
Not exact matches
But in the early stages, when a new contender first challenges an
accepted paradigm, the criteria do not yield an unambiguous
verdict; the experimental
evidence and the relative weights assigned to diverse criteria are debatable and subject to individual judgment.
There is a clear distinction between:
evidence (or testimony), which consists of statements of fact given by witnesses on oath (subject to prosecution for perjury), governed by the rules of
evidence, and which the jury is required to consider but not
accept (in the sense that a
verdict which is not supported by the
evidence can be set aside on appeal),...
[21] Based on a review of the
evidence at trial, described in part above, and the cases cited, as well as a review of the submissions of counsel, I find that the offer to settle in the amount of $ 75,000 ought reasonably to have been
accepted by the plaintiff having given consideration to the foreseeable credibility problems and the negative
verdict of the jury.