Sentences with phrase «verdict against my client»

Aiello's attorney, Stephen Coffey, called the verdict against his client «confused» and said he would file a motion to set it aside.

Can I get the $ 1.4 million verdict against my client thrown out for this reason?

We obtained reversal of a multi-million-dollar verdict against our client, successfully arguing that the evidence at trial was legally and factually insufficient to sustain employer liability and front pay on the plaintiff's hostile - environment claims.

Not exact matches

A $ 780,000.00 verdict against W. Supply Company when its truck crossed center and struck the vehicle in which our client was a passenger.

Plaintiff jury verdict in CT Complex Litigation Court with damages awarded against business client of $ 0.00.

Andrew J. Blischak, the other member of our accomplished legal team, has interned in both criminal defense and personal injury firms, so that by the time he joined our practice he was already able to vigorously defend clients against criminal charges as well as to fight aggressively for high personal injury settlements and verdicts.

Our personal injury law firm also secured a move than $ 1 million verdict against a business that failed to follow proper procedures for pouring hot asphalt, which burned our client who was performing maintenance work.

Represented an Alabama company against wrongful interference with its rock quarry business in a jury trial in Scottsboro, Alabama resulted in a multi-million dollar jury verdict for the client.

Since 1991, we have successfully obtained real results — not - guilty verdicts, reduced charges, dropped cases or death penalty taken off the table — for every client we have defended against a charge of murder.

The jury verdict against Collins crosses the Rubicon in terms of the federal government's willingness to prosecute an outside deal lawyer for merely advising a client in regard to structuring transactions that are not intrinsically illegal.

As defense counsel, we have helped our clients avoid billions of dollars in exposure through dispositive motion practice, favorable settlements and verdicts, and by convincing federal and state regulators to drop charges against our clients.

After a four - day trial, Keri Simms and Jeremy Richter obtained defense verdicts against all plaintiffs in a multiparty action against their clients in the matter of Felicia Ferguson, et al. v. Johnny R. Lovett Trucking, Inc., et al..

After a four - day trial in May 2016, Keri Simms and Jeremy Richter obtained defense verdicts against all plaintiffs in a multiparty action against their clients in the matter of Felicia Ferguson, et al. v. Johnny R. Lovett Trucking, Inc., et al..

Won an appeal at the Supreme Judicial Court reversing a seven figure handicap discrimination jury verdict and dismissal of the case against our employer - client.

Our advocacy has allowed clients to obtain justice against major companies, resulting in over one billion dollars in settlements and verdicts.

The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court vacated a large judgment against Kim's client, a township, and remanded for the entry of judgment notwithstanding the verdict, on the basis that the trial evidence failed to demonstrate that the township was responsible for the decedent's death.

Our personal injury and medical malpractice attorneys have over 50 years of experience going against hospital insurance companies who refuse to take responsibility for negligent doctors and securing satisfactory settlements and verdicts for our clients.

We defended a jury verdict against challenges in two consolidated appeals, successfully arguing that our client did not obstruct or create dangerous conditions on a roadway adjacent to our client's railroad tracks.

The Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed the ruling of the trial court and awarded a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, vacating a large verdict against Kim's client, a mutual insurance company, on the basis that the insurer's conduct in handling a fire damage claim did not constitute bad faith as a matter of law.

The Superior Court vacated a large judgment against Kim's client and remanded for the entry of judgment notwithstanding the verdict, finding that the plaintiff had failed to establish the store had actual or constructive notice of the allegedly defective condition.

Learn more about our work defending clients against state crimes and federal crimes by reviewing some of our past verdicts and resolutions.

Nick Carter and Joseph Cacace obtained a federal jury verdict of $ 1.5 million on behalf of their law enforcement client against the City of Fitchburg and its former mayor for defamatory statements and employment discrimination stemming from the withdrawal of the client's nomination as police chief in 2014.

Our Health Law practice won an $ 18 million verdict against the New York State Department of Health for clinical laboratory clients.

$ 13.82 million — Verdict in a case against L.A. County MTA Bus Company — Our attorneys used onboard video footage to demonstrate how a bus collision with a parked truck caused serious injury to our client, a passenger.

Defended same client against product defect action, winning not guilty verdict in highly publicized jury trial.

Nevada court upholds verdict against licensee when the sale of clients» home collapsed and the clients could not terminate a purchase contract.