Sentences with phrase «verdict in favor of»

A jury returned a verdict in favor of the Buyers on all allegations, and the Salesperson and Brokerage filed a motion with the court asking the judge to set aside the verdict.

The jury returned a verdict in favor of the Brokerage and the Seller.

A trial was held, and the trial court entered a directed verdict in favor of the Salesperson and his broker following the conclusion of the Developers» case.

Therefore, the court reversed the trial court and reinstated the jury verdict in favor of the Owners.

Because the Developers had failed to produce testimony to support their fraud allegations, the court affirmed the trial court's directed verdict in favor of the Salesperson.

Fogel v. Rob Realty (204 A.D. 2d 135) verdict in favor of broker affirmed, broker produced buyer ready, willing and able; testimony of broker and employee was sufficient to show meeting of minds concerning price and financing terms.

Since the jury had found that the Sellers and Brokerage had fulfilled this obligation, the court affirmed the verdict in favor of the Sellers and the Brokerage.

A South Carolina appellate court has decided whether a lower court properly directed a verdict in favor of a brokerage based on a protection clause contained in the listing agreement.

The court next considered the Owner's challenge to the jury verdict in favor of the Auction Company on the breach of fiduciary duty claims.

The trial court overruled a jury verdict in favor of the Buyers and entered judgment in favor of the Seller and Broker, due to the Buyers» failure to present expert testimony on the property's diminution in value due to the defects.

A jury returned a verdict in favor of the Hellers on all allegations, and Marozzi and the brokerage filed a motion with the court asking the judge to set aside the verdict.

On appeal, the appellate court affirmed the directed verdict for the appraiser on the intentional misrepresentation claim, but reversed the directed verdict in favor of the appraiser on the negligent misrepresentation claim.

Instead of allowing a jury decision, at the close of the evidence, the trial court granted a directed verdict in favor of the appraiser defendants, finding that the appraised value was an opinion that could not be an actionable misrepresentation.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the federal appeals court reinstated the $ 119.6 million jury verdict in favor of Tim Cook's company in its fight against Samsung that was overturned by a U.S. circuit appeals in February.

A California jury returned an 11 - 1 defense verdict in favor of Nissan North America, Inc. in the case Steiner v. Nissan.

Obtained jury verdict in favor of power plant construction company in federal breach of fiduciary duty claim against former CEO.

Obtained directed verdict in favor of Florida Senate and various Florida school districts over funding distributions to school boards, after three day trial.

The jury returned a unanimous verdict in favor of the manufacturer.

2015 — Reihaney v. Fresenius (CDCA) Obtained jury verdict in favor of client Fresenius in wrongful termination suit brought by Fresenius» former President of Research and Development.

The court entered a directed verdict in favor of the client on the failure to warn and punitive damages claim, and the Plaintiff then settled the design defect claim.

Obtained a jury verdict in favor of Union Carbide and entry of a $ 153 million damages award.

The objector wished to challenge the amount of fees awarded to class counsel from the $ 36 million common fund created when the jury entered its verdict in favor of the class.

The appellate court affirmed the verdict in favor of the plaintiff, finding that sufficient evidence was presented to allow the lower court to rule in her favor.

The jury verdict in favor of the judge was upheld by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court in Murphy v. Herald, et al., 449 Mass. 42, 865 N.E. 2d 746 (2007).

Issuing a directed verdict in favor of Hustler on the issue of invasion of privacy, a federal district court also ruled against Falwell on his libel claim because, the court said, no reasonable person would believe the situation depicted in the ad to be true.

The jury deliberated for a few hours and returned a verdict in favor of the injured patient for a total of $ 650,000 in monetary damages, with interest set at 6 percent starting from the date of the injury in 2010.

A court of appeals in California recently released an opinion in a personal injury lawsuit that reversed a jury verdict in favor of a plaintiff who sustained injuries when he was struck by a vehicle being driven by an employee of the defendant as he returned from work.

In an earlier ruling on the merits of the case, the Federal Circuit upheld Judge Matsch's decision setting aside the jury's verdict in favor of Medtronic and granting judgment as a matter of law in favor of BrainLAB.

After Morrison trimmed more than $ 7 billion from a $ 9 billion verdict in favor of Vivendi shareholders, false rumors spread that some of those claims would be refiled in Canada.

The Pennsylvania Superior Court vacated an adverse jury verdict and remanded for the entry of judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of Kim's client on the basis that the trial court failed to make the threshold determination of whether an absolute privilege applied to the hospital's use of the plaintiff's confidential personnel file at a labor relations hearing involving unionization of nurses.

Earlier this month, an appellate court in Idaho issued a written opinion affirming a jury's verdict in favor of a man who lost his wife to a serious infection after undergoing a procedure at the defendant's cosmetic clinic.

Obtained a jury verdict in favor of Sempra Generation on all counts following a four - week jury trial in a case challenging Sempra's $ 6.6 billion energy supply contract with the California Department of Water Resources.

As a result of the court's decision, the jury's verdict in favor of the plaintiff was affirmed.

Earlier this month, an appellate court in Nebraska upheld a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff that consisted of zero dollars.

However, once the jury returns a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, the award amount that the jury reaches can be subject to a judge's review under certain circumstances.

However, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defense, based on the plaintiff's inability to establish that her damages were a result of the accident.

In Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. v. Bush, a trucking company and its driver appealed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

It does make it more difficult for some jurors to render a verdict in favor of the plaintiff where the pictures of the car don't really show that «someone must have been hurt in the crash.»

Jury verdict in favor of plaintiff for $ 6,000,000.

The case was tried reverse bifurcated and after phase I the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defense, finding that the decedent's mesothelioma was not caused by his asbestos exposure.

After deliberating for about seven hours, the jury returned an unanimous verdict in favor of Lincoln.

Mr. McConnell has also successfully tried cases including a complete defense verdict on behalf of a national retailer in a discrimination, harassment and retaliation case in Los Angeles Superior Court, a complete defense verdict on behalf of a contractor on a claim for unlawful retaliation in San Diego Superior Court, and a directed verdict in favor of a home builder on claims for breach of contract and failure to pay wages.

Obtained a verdict in favor of the City of Cleveland after a three - week trial resulting in the then - largest eminent domain challenge in Ohio, which preserved property for future airport expansion

After a jury returned a verdict in favor of the doctor in a medical malpractice case, an estate executor appealed on two questions of abuse of discretion: limitations on the scope of questions during the defendant's deposition, and refusal of jury instructions tendered by the plaintiff.

After phase I the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $ 200,000.

The North Carolina Court of Appeals unanimously reversed the trial court's denial of the judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of the D...

«In an unusual summary opinion, without hearing oral argument, the Court today sent back to the 11th Circuit for further review its holding that a jury verdict in favor of two employees was appropriately set aside.

The plaintiffs» product liability and negligence claims went to trial, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant.

This is the second verdict in favor of an ASR plaintiff.

Obtained a defense verdict in favor of a major Orlando theme park following a seven - day jury trial.