Sentences with phrase «verdict in favor of the plaintiff»

In recent times, this is one of a handful of antitrust class actions that has gone to a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs.

The defendant appealed from the large verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

The appellate court began its analysis by noting that the general rule is that a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff but for zero dollars is ambiguous and must be clarified.

Jury verdict in favor of plaintiff for $ 6,000,000.

A cruise ship injury resulted in a $ 21.5 million verdict in favor of plaintiff after jurors in the federal lawsuit determined the cruise line was grossly negligent for failing to fix a faulty door, which was a known problem.

$ 60,000 Trial Verdict in favor of Plaintiff, a corporation, on a breach of contract claim against Defendant for failure to pay Plaintiff for picture framing services.

After a trial that lasted for seven days, the jury deliberated for two before returning with a gross verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $ 3,778,095.94.

Among the other verdicts in favor of plaintiffs are two against Ethicon for $ 1.2 million and $ 11 million, respectively, and $ 2 million against manufacturer C.R. Bard.

A court of appeals in California recently released an opinion in a personal injury lawsuit that reversed a jury verdict in favor of a plaintiff who sustained injuries when he was struck by a vehicle being driven by an employee of the defendant as he returned from work.

Earlier this month, an appellate court in Nebraska upheld a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff that consisted of zero dollars.

If the jurors rated similarly situated attorneys equally, as one might expect, the lines on the graphs would appear as a perfect «X.» One would expect the defense attorneys to be rated significantly higher than the plaintiff attorneys when the juries return a verdict in favor of the defendant on all counts and the plaintiff attorneys to be rated significantly higher than the defense attorneys when the juries return a verdict in favor of the plaintiff on all counts.

The trial judge directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs on the contract claim, so the jury had to decide the amount of compensatory damages and the fraud and punitive damages claims.

The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and awarded him damages for past and future medical expenses, but not for past or future pain and suffering.

Ultimately, the court affirmed the lower court's verdict in favor of the plaintiff, finding that the defendant's challenges to the lower court's rulings were without merit.

The jury deliberated for five hours before returning a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

After a trial lasting for five days, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

The jury deliberated for 2 1/2 hours before returning a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

The jury deliberated for a total of four hours over two days before returning a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

After phase I the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $ 200,000.

It does make it more difficult for some jurors to render a verdict in favor of the plaintiff where the pictures of the car don't really show that «someone must have been hurt in the crash.»

In Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. v. Bush, a trucking company and its driver appealed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

However, once the jury returns a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, the award amount that the jury reaches can be subject to a judge's review under certain circumstances.

As a result of the court's decision, the jury's verdict in favor of the plaintiff was affirmed.

The appellate court affirmed the verdict in favor of the plaintiff, finding that sufficient evidence was presented to allow the lower court to rule in her favor.