Sentences with phrase «verdict is in favor»

He or she also announces the type and amount of damages that the defendant must pay if the verdict is in favor of the plaintiff.

A jury trial commenced, and the verdict was in favor of PURE.

Not exact matches

Here, the verdict is in da Vinci's favor: Robotic surgery tends to be both better for the patient and more cost - effective.

He was serious and solemn throughout it all - including his sober reaction to the verdict in his favor.

Here at BA we were lucky enough to try both, and the verdict is in: one is very good, so may the odds be ever in your favor.

There IS a correlation between breast size and ability to breastfeed, and the verdict falls in favor of small breasted women.

«We are disappointed with the decision not to vote in favor of our application to rezone Sherman Plaza but want to thank Community Board 12, Borough President Brewer, the City Planning Commission and the Mayor for working with us over the last two years in support of the project,» said Paul Travis, head of Washington Square Partners, in a statement following the Council's verdict.

Still, like any court case, it's all about whether you get a verdict in your favor in the end, and my verdict of From the Hip ends up a positive one, based on its style more so than its substance.

The findings and results might be surprising for Apple's products that have been long known for their razor - sharp excellence but the verdict is out in favor of Amazon and Google.

The official verdict of «Robert Fletcher and Bartlow Gallery Ltd v. Peter Marryat Doig» was ruled in favor of defendant Peter Doig by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, on Tuesday, August 23, 2016 at 3PM CDT.

There is zero chance that Mann's lawsuit will ever result in a verdict in his favor.

The data was further analyzed based on three jury outcomes: (1) whether the jury returned a verdict that was entirely in favor of the state / plaintiff on all counts, (2) in favor of the defendant on all counts, or (3) there was a split decision.

The scores given denote the percentage change in scores for both sides from when the verdict was returned entirely in their favor to when the verdict was returned entirely in favor of the other party.

The appeal is hereby DISMISSED, and the verdict in favor of «The Kookaburra Who Sits in the Old Gum Tree» is AFFIRMED.

For example, on a scale of 1 = Excellent and 5 = Very Poor, jurors gave defense attorneys, on average, a competence score of 1.68 when they returned a verdict that was completely in favor of the defendant, 1.95 when they returned a split verdict, and 2.23 when they returned a verdict that was all in favor of the state / plaintiff.

However, even in the categories where jurors come close to rating both sides equally, the plaintiff attorneys are still not rated as low as the defense attorneys when the verdict is not returned in their favor and they are rated significantly higher than the defense attorneys when the verdict is returned in their favor.

If the jurors rated similarly situated attorneys equally, as one might expect, the lines on the graphs would appear as a perfect «X.» One would expect the defense attorneys to be rated significantly higher than the plaintiff attorneys when the juries return a verdict in favor of the defendant on all counts and the plaintiff attorneys to be rated significantly higher than the defense attorneys when the juries return a verdict in favor of the plaintiff on all counts.

Chart 1 illustrates jurors» diminished perception of attorneys when the jury's verdict was entirely in favor of the opposing party.

To spare the parties in this case in which the outcome was obvious the time and expense of further litigation, Judge Carton dismissed the appeal and affirmed the verdict in favor of «The Kookaburra Who Sits in the Old Gum Tree.»

Mr. Stern and Ms. Deluhery obtained a federal jury verdict in favor of a male prep school student in New Hampshire, who had been expelled following a mishandled internal investigation into his sexual encounter with an underage female student.

Otis filed a claim against Cusick, the case was tried, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of Otis for $ 4 million.

Most of the time we are able to negotiate fair settlements for our clients (the vast majority of injury claims in the U.S. are resolved in this way), but we are always ready, willing and able to go to trial for our clients in order to seek a jury verdict in their favor.

After deliberation, the jury returned a general verdict in the defendant's favor, finding that the defendant was not liable for any of the plaintiff's injuries.

Less than a month after receiving his $ 3.4 million payout of a libel verdict in his favor against the Boston Herald, Massachusetts Superior Court Judge Ernest Murphy has been hit with formal charges of misconduct for writing threatening and intimidating letters to the newspaper's publisher.

In Colorado, U.S. District Senior Judge Richard P. Matsch was so infuriated by the trial conduct of counsel for Medtronic Navigation Inc. that he had already overturned a jury's $ 51 million verdict in its favor, as The Denver Post reportIn Colorado, U.S. District Senior Judge Richard P. Matsch was so infuriated by the trial conduct of counsel for Medtronic Navigation Inc. that he had already overturned a jury's $ 51 million verdict in its favor, as The Denver Post reportin its favor, as The Denver Post reports.

A year ago, it was difficult to know who to sue for the health issues and property damage caused by defective Chinese Dry Wall located in homes across the U.S. Recently, a $ 2.6 million verdict came back in favor of seven Virginia homeowners who were adversely affected by Chinese Dry Wall.

We have extensive experience representing people in your situation, and our team is prepared to stand by you throughout the process of pursuing a settlement or jury verdict in your favor.

The case proceeded to a jury trial, where a verdict was issued in the plaintiff's favor.

However, in some cases, even a verdict in the plaintiff's favor is not enough.

The respondents in Tyson Foods were certified as a class, and a verdict was returned in their favor at trial.

In recent times, this is one of a handful of antitrust class actions that has gone to a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffIn recent times, this is one of a handful of antitrust class actions that has gone to a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffin favor of the plaintiffs.

The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff clients and a judgment in the clients» favor was entered (Wharton County, Texas).

There's something romantic about a jury returning a big verdict in your favor.

In the event that they refuse to pay you a fair settlement out of court, we may even be able to take the case to trial to fight for a jury verdict in your favoIn the event that they refuse to pay you a fair settlement out of court, we may even be able to take the case to trial to fight for a jury verdict in your favoin your favor.

Provided research, briefing and trial support, including drafting of jury instructions, trial brief, and motions in limine, in a case in Mayes County, Oklahoma, in which a defense verdict was obtained in favor of a loss prevention investigator who was an employee of a shoe retailer.

However, if the insurance company simply will not cooperate and offer a settlement that is fair, we may take your case to civil court to seek a judge's verdict in your favor.

The Eighth Circuit United States Court of Appeals recently released an opinion affirming a jury verdict in favor of a defendant after a trial was held on the plaintiffs» allegations surrounding the death of their 23 - month - old son.

This is the second verdict in favor of an ASR plaintiff.

«In an unusual summary opinion, without hearing oral argument, the Court today sent back to the 11th Circuit for further review its holding that a jury verdict in favor of two employees was appropriately set asidIn an unusual summary opinion, without hearing oral argument, the Court today sent back to the 11th Circuit for further review its holding that a jury verdict in favor of two employees was appropriately set asidin favor of two employees was appropriately set aside.

The case was tried reverse bifurcated and after phase I the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defense, finding that the decedent's mesothelioma was not caused by his asbestos exposure.

It does make it more difficult for some jurors to render a verdict in favor of the plaintiff where the pictures of the car don't really show that «someone must have been hurt in the crash.»

His trial results include a jury verdict of more than $ 4.1 million in favor of a the family of a 42 - year - old mother of three who was killed in an automobile collision.

However, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defense, based on the plaintiff's inability to establish that her damages were a result of the accident.

The result was a $ 7 Million verdict in her favor.

However, once the jury returns a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, the award amount that the jury reaches can be subject to a judge's review under certain circumstances.

As a result of the court's decision, the jury's verdict in favor of the plaintiff was affirmed.

After Morrison trimmed more than $ 7 billion from a $ 9 billion verdict in favor of Vivendi shareholders, false rumors spread that some of those claims would be refiled in Canada.

The driver's insurance company was in a weak negotiating position because it was clear that the driver would make a bad witness in front of a jury because she expressed no willingness to take responsibility for her actions which increased the likelihood of a large verdict in the plaintiff's favor.

A court of appeals in California recently released an opinion in a personal injury lawsuit that reversed a jury verdict in favor of a plaintiff who sustained injuries when he was struck by a vehicle being driven by an employee of the defendant as he returned from work.

I suppose there could be valid reasons why 4 out of every 5 jury verdicts go in favor of the doctor or hospital — maybe the strongest cases are all being settled before trial, leaving only the weakest cases behind — but it's hard to say that with a straight face when those figures mean that malpractice defendants have better odds winning in a courtroom than the odds a casino has winning its own games.