While the final
verdict of a court case can help wipe away a bad mark, that can take years to happen.
Not exact matches
Can they expect the same results they achieved in the
case of Argentina, in which a series
of bondholder - friendly
court verdicts ultimately forced the government to settle?
The
Court of Justice
of the European Union just issued its final
verdict in a multi-year
case, classifying Uber as a transport service.
After March 4, 2013, an International Arrest Warrant will be issued against these Defendants.The guilty
verdict followed nearly a month
of deliberations by more than thirty sworn Citizen Jurors
of the 150
case exhibits produced by
Court Prosecutors, The
Court's judgement declares the wealth and property
of the churches responsible for the Canadian genocide to be forfeited and placed under public ownership, as reparations for the families
of the more than 50,000 children who died in the residential schools.To enforce its sentence, the
Court has empowered citizens in Canada, the United States, England, Italy and a dozen other nations to act as its legal agents armed with warrants, and peacefully occupy and seize properties
of the Roman Catholic, Anglican and United Church
of Canada, which are the main agents in the deaths
of these children
Jurors deliberated for about five hours before announcing the
verdict in the
case of Brian David Mitchell, 57,
court officials said.
Cases of conversion in Malaysia have been plagued by official dissension and charges
of apostasy as Muslim authorities challenged
verdicts by secular
courts in Shari`ah tribunals.
Nicola Sturgeon's decision to join the
court case over the government's handling
of Brexit is expected to delay the
verdict on whether Theresa May can trigger Article 50 without consulting parliament.
The group say regardless
of today's
verdict in
court, they will continue to fight to highlight the
case of this family and the many like them who have been turfed out
of their homes.
«The Supreme
Court is going to render a
verdict in the Governor McDonnell
case before the end
of June.
Jurors had informed the
court twice that they were deadlocked in the
case against Percoco and three businessmen accused
of paying his family more than $ 300,000 in bribes, but U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni ordered them to keep deliberating and on Tuesday said she would accept a partial
verdict.
EFCC lawyer Mr.Oluwa Leke Atolagbe, shortly after the trial
court was served a copy
of the apex
court verdict, applied for an adjournment to enable the agency to effectively «prepare for the
case».
There is disquiet in the All Progressives Congress (APC) In Ondo State over the
verdict of the Supreme
Court on a
case between Governor Oluwarotimi Akeredolu...
Mr Okujeto Ablakwa who was commenting on Supreme
Court Judge, Justice Jones Dotse's advice to political parties to emulate the attitude exhibited by Nana Akufo - Addo, who accepted the
Court's
verdict on the 2012 Election petition
case that ruled in favour
of NDC's President John Mahama.
Making reference to the
Courts Act
of 1993 (Act 459), Mr Justice Ofoe said Section 31 (2) holds that «an appellate
court, on hearing an appeal in a criminal
case, shall allow the appeal if the appellate
court considers (a) that the
verdict or conviction or acquittal ought to be set aside on the ground that it is unreasonable or can not be supported having regard to the evidence, or (b) that the judgement in question ought to be set aside as a wrong decision on a question
of law or fact, or (c) that there was a miscarriage
of justice, and in any other
case shall dismiss the appeal.»
Two Justices
of the Supreme
Court, Williams Atuguba and Jones Dotse offer their insights into the Supreme
Court's consideration
of the petition, the ensuing
case and their final
verdict.
But despite a number
of convictions, they've been on a bad streak lately, with
courts throwing out
verdicts or juries deadlocking in some
of their biggest
cases.
The top
court decision, which came shortly after the Skelos and Silver
verdicts, clarified what constitutes an «official act»
of corruption and defense lawyers in both
cases contend that the ruling invalidates legal instructions given to their Manhattan juries.
The suspect has been arraigned before
court and has been remanded into prison's custody pending final
verdict of the
case.
In one
of the longest
cases — lasting almost five years — in the history
of the U.S. federal
courts, Honeywell v. Sperry Rand, Judge Earl R. Larson concluded in the 1973
verdict that Eckert and Mauchly's patent for the ENIAC was invalid.
The
Court of Appeal decided the
case on 18 June, but released the
verdict (in Dutch) only yesterday.
Still, like any
court case, it's all about whether you get a
verdict in your favor in the end, and my
verdict of From the Hip ends up a positive one, based on its style more so than its substance.
Nevertheless, the report has gotten a second life in progressive circles, likely due to concerns over the U.S. Supreme
Court case Friedrichs v. the California Teachers Association that could significantly harm the finances
of unions should the
verdict (due in early 2016) go to the plaintiff.
As the bank started proceedings, it was set on the
court calendar for hearing, assigned a
case number which opens a record file under your name regardless
of the out come,
verdict or settlement prior to the hearing.
Verdict expected for «bizarre» Peter Doig
case The unusual
court case involving the artist Peter Doig, who has been accused
of falsely denying authorship
of a painting, concluded in Chicago yesterday, reports ArtNet News.
Even though the state supreme
court overturned the
verdict of the «bizarre
case» on a technicality, the public fallout was intense.
Earlier this month the
Court of Appeals of Indiana ruled (via Deliberations) in an interesting case that involved a jury deciding that a plaintiff should be awarded $ 336,300 in damages, but failing to adequately communicate that to the court because of confusion about how the verdict form wo
Court of Appeals
of Indiana ruled (via Deliberations) in an interesting
case that involved a jury deciding that a plaintiff should be awarded $ 336,300 in damages, but failing to adequately communicate that to the
court because of confusion about how the verdict form wo
court because
of confusion about how the
verdict form worked.
In these HTC
cases victorious
verdicts have been obtained by which the German first instance
courts confirmed infringement and validity
of Near Field Communication (NFC) patents.
The firm has tried hundreds
of court and jury
cases to conclusion — averaging 15 to 20 jury
verdicts per year.
In June 2008, Lightfoot tried a products liability
case to a defense jury
verdict on behalf
of CNH America in the Circuit
Court of Marshall County, Alabama.
Once the jury has reached a decision, they convene in
court again with all parties assembled so the
verdict of the
case can be read.
Lee and Johnny Kendrick vs. Albert Padwa and John Doe — Caleb Walker and Macon personal injury lawyer Kathy McArthur tried this
case in the State
Court of Fulton County beginning September 1, 2015, ending with a
verdict of $ 375,000 for the Plaintiffs on Friday, Sept. 4.
A Florida appellate
court recently reversed a lower
court's ruling that when the amount
of the judgment in a tort
case is modified on appeal, post-trial interest must accrue from the date
of the
verdict rather than from the date
of the original judgment.
Mr. Lyons has more than 30 years
of jury trial experience and has litigated hundreds
of cases in state and federal
courts throughout the United States, including successfully trying more than 40
cases to
verdict.
DECATUR — A Macon County Circuit
Court case that rocked the Land
of Make Believe ended with a shocking jury
verdict Wednesday morning: Her Roy...
He accomplished much in
court, trying trying dozens
of cases to jury
verdict for his clients.
We have secured significant jury
verdicts and sizeable out -
of -
court settlements for injured individuals and their families in
cases involving trucking and transportation accidents, dangerous and defective products, construction accidents, commercial plane crashes, explosions and burns caused by gas and electric power utilities, medical negligence, workplace catastrophes, and business disputes.
Only three days after Judge Kaplan's spectacular ruling in the Chevron / Ecuador
case, notes Paul Barrett at Business Week, «a state appellate
court in California upheld a trial judge's finding that what had been billed as a watershed liability
verdict against Dole Food over pesticide use in Nicaragua was actually the product
of a corrupt conspiracy by plaintiffs» lawyers.»
As a result, the
court reversed the $ 2 million judgment and remanded the
case back to the trial
court for entry
of judgment notwithstanding the
verdict in favor
of our client.
Kevin has tried a large number
of jury
cases to
verdict in state and federal
courts in Connecticut, and boasts a significant win rate.
The Appellate Practice Group was retained following the entry
of a jury
verdict in a construction accident
case in the Philadelphia County
Court of Common Pleas.
Despite significant medical testimony in support
of plaintiff's
case and in spite
of enormous emotional impact
of the death
of a young woman who left a widower and a young son, Kevin obtained a defendant's
verdict and then was able to protect the
verdict at the Appellate and Supreme
Court level.
The Unified Judicial System
of Pennsylvania, which is the unified state
court system for Pennsylvania, annually reports medical malpractice
case filing statistics for our state, as well as statistics related to medical malpractice jury and non-jury
verdicts by year.
Because
of how the principle
of judicial independence is interpreted by
courts, the original trial judge in this
case could not be asked why it had taken 9 months to reach a
verdict, and could not be questioned whether the delay was due to the complexity
of the
case, the judge's workload, or other personal reasons, such as illness.
Previous: Double jeopardy doesn't bar retrial in
case of inconsistent
verdicts, Supreme
Court rules
The aunts and primary caregivers
of the accused in the
case — Andrew Cowan — submitted the complaint, claiming Crown attorney Thomas Meehan and Ontario Superior
Court Justice Kelly Gorman met for drinks the evening after the jury had rendered its guilty
verdict.
The basis on which the
Court of Appeal in those
cases concluded that the date
of the advance was relevant to costs was because the plaintiff «had in hand more at the start
of the action than the amount
of the jury's
verdict.»
We also represent clients in federal
court where we have successfully obtained defense
verdicts in jury trials in premises liability
cases despite the challenges
of litigating in a pro-plaintiff jurisdiction.
But the
verdict was reduced by the procedural hodgepodge
of Maryland Code § 5 - 524
of the
Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article that limits the sovereign immunity waiver to the available insurance coverage in car accident
cases.
[81] The
court confirmed that under HPA s. 35, an inquiry committee should be satisfied
of a prima facie
case, meaning a
case for allegations which, if believed, is sufficient to justify a
verdict «in the absence
of an answer», and that the public requires protection through an interim order.
While I'm not sure if it's technically correct that there's no evidence
of wrongdoing whatsoever, it seems strange to me that in a legal system where the defendant is innocent until proven guilty, an appeals
court would not be legally required to exonerate the convict if unable to find any evidence (or the single piece
of evidence was retracted, as in this
case) with which they could have rendered a guilty
verdict in the first place.