Not exact matches
To
claim something is fact, you must provide
verifiable evidence to
support your
claim of fact.
You must provide
verifiable evidence to
support your
claim.
That means I do not believe any of the god
claims I have heard, because there is never, ever, any hard,
verifiable, logical, objective
evidence to
support them.
If you continue to make statements of fact regarding your beliefs, I will be forced to demand
supporting verifiable evidence for your
claims.
Please provide
verifiable evidence that
supports your
claim that a god exists.
What is intellectually dishonest is making
claims of «fact» in your post without
verifiable supporting evidence.
There is not a single bit of factual, objective, independent or
verifiable evidence to
support any of the supernatural
claims in The Babble.
To make these
claims without the presentation of
verifiable supporting evidence is intellectually dishonest.
Now, if there were ANY valid,
verifiable evidence to
support the
claims about this god, or any of the thousands of other gods...